On the circuit diameter conjecture for counterexamples to the Hirsch conjecture

IF 1.6 4区 数学 Q3 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Alexander E. Black , Steffen Borgwardt , Matthias Brugger
{"title":"On the circuit diameter conjecture for counterexamples to the Hirsch conjecture","authors":"Alexander E. Black ,&nbsp;Steffen Borgwardt ,&nbsp;Matthias Brugger","doi":"10.1016/j.disopt.2025.100910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Circuit diameters of polyhedra are a fundamental tool for studying the complexity of circuit augmentation schemes for linear programming and for finding lower bounds on combinatorial diameters. The main open problem in this area is the circuit diameter conjecture, the analogue of the Hirsch conjecture in the circuit setting. A natural question is whether the well-known counterexamples to the Hirsch conjecture carry over. Previously, Stephen and Yusun showed that the Klee-Walkup counterexample to the unbounded Hirsch conjecture does not transfer to the circuit setting. Our main contribution is to show that the original counterexamples for other variants, using monotone walks or for bounded polytopes, also do not transfer. A challenge lies in the dependence of circuit diameters on the specific realization of a polyhedron. We discuss for which realizations, in addition to the original ones from the literature, our tools resolve this question.</div><div>Our results rely on new observations on structural properties of these counterexamples. To analyze the bounded case, we exploit the geometry of certain 2-faces of the polytopes underlying all known bounded Hirsch counterexamples in Santos’ work. For Todd’s monotone Hirsch counterexample, we study linear programs on spindles and prove sufficient conditions for short monotone circuit walks to exist. We then enumerate all linear programs over Todd’s polytope and find four new orientations that contradict the monotone Hirsch conjecture, while the remaining 7107 satisfy the bound. The conclusion then follows by applying these sufficient conditions to Todd’s counterexample.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50571,"journal":{"name":"Discrete Optimization","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 100910"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discrete Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572528625000337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Circuit diameters of polyhedra are a fundamental tool for studying the complexity of circuit augmentation schemes for linear programming and for finding lower bounds on combinatorial diameters. The main open problem in this area is the circuit diameter conjecture, the analogue of the Hirsch conjecture in the circuit setting. A natural question is whether the well-known counterexamples to the Hirsch conjecture carry over. Previously, Stephen and Yusun showed that the Klee-Walkup counterexample to the unbounded Hirsch conjecture does not transfer to the circuit setting. Our main contribution is to show that the original counterexamples for other variants, using monotone walks or for bounded polytopes, also do not transfer. A challenge lies in the dependence of circuit diameters on the specific realization of a polyhedron. We discuss for which realizations, in addition to the original ones from the literature, our tools resolve this question.
Our results rely on new observations on structural properties of these counterexamples. To analyze the bounded case, we exploit the geometry of certain 2-faces of the polytopes underlying all known bounded Hirsch counterexamples in Santos’ work. For Todd’s monotone Hirsch counterexample, we study linear programs on spindles and prove sufficient conditions for short monotone circuit walks to exist. We then enumerate all linear programs over Todd’s polytope and find four new orientations that contradict the monotone Hirsch conjecture, while the remaining 7107 satisfy the bound. The conclusion then follows by applying these sufficient conditions to Todd’s counterexample.
赫希猜想反例的电路直径猜想
多面体的电路直径是研究线性规划中电路增广方案的复杂性和求组合直径下界的基本工具。这一领域的主要开放问题是电路直径猜想,类似于电路设置中的赫希猜想。一个自然的问题是赫希猜想的著名反例是否适用。先前,Stephen和Yusun证明了无界Hirsch猜想的Klee-Walkup反例不能转移到电路设置中。我们的主要贡献是表明其他变体的原始反例,使用单调行走或有界多面体,也不会转移。一个挑战在于电路直径依赖于多面体的具体实现。我们讨论了除了文献中的原始实现之外,我们的工具解决了哪些实现。我们的结果依赖于对这些反例的结构特性的新观察。为了分析有界情况,我们利用了Santos工作中所有已知有界Hirsch反例的多面体的某些2面几何。对于Todd的单调Hirsch反例,我们研究了主轴上的线性规划,证明了短单调回路存在的充分条件。然后,我们枚举Todd的多面体上的所有线性规划,并找到四个与单调Hirsch猜想相矛盾的新方向,而其余的7107个满足界。然后通过将这些充分条件应用到Todd的反例中得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Discrete Optimization
Discrete Optimization 管理科学-应用数学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Discrete Optimization publishes research papers on the mathematical, computational and applied aspects of all areas of integer programming and combinatorial optimization. In addition to reports on mathematical results pertinent to discrete optimization, the journal welcomes submissions on algorithmic developments, computational experiments, and novel applications (in particular, large-scale and real-time applications). The journal also publishes clearly labelled surveys, reviews, short notes, and open problems. Manuscripts submitted for possible publication to Discrete Optimization should report on original research, should not have been previously published, and should not be under consideration for publication by any other journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信