Travel time tolerance of alternative paths in road networks: A national survey study in China

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Yibing Hu, Xiangdong Xu
{"title":"Travel time tolerance of alternative paths in road networks: A national survey study in China","authors":"Yibing Hu,&nbsp;Xiangdong Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.103363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Providing travelers with a reasonable number of alternative paths is important for improving transportation network resilience against disruptions. However, travelers may reject overly long paths as alternative paths when their primarily used paths become unavailable, and the travel time tolerance of alternative paths has not been extensively explored. This study investigates travel time tolerance in car journeys along alternative paths and applies survival analysis theory to address two fundamental questions: <em>“What main factors influence the tolerance?”</em> and <em>“How to estimate the tolerance?”</em>. Tolerance herein refers to the maximum additional travel time accepted by travelers for alternative paths compared to the shortest path travel time. A national survey of over 2,500 valid responses from 305 cities across China reveals statistically significant results: (1) commuters generally exhibit lower tolerance than non-commuters; (2) travelers in developing areas show higher tolerance than those in metropolitan areas; (3) tolerance typically increases with travel distance; and (4) personal attributes such as age, gender, income, travel mode, and commuting duration also influence tolerance. To address complexities of these influences, we propose universal estimation methods using non-linear fitting and accelerated failure time models from both aggregated and disaggregated perspectives. These methods enable to quantify the number of alternative paths within travelers’ tolerance based on city specifics and travelers’ information. This study helps in planning alternative paths that are potentially acceptable to travelers and enhances understanding of travelers’ behavior under disruptions, leading to better road network resilience assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103363"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825003183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Providing travelers with a reasonable number of alternative paths is important for improving transportation network resilience against disruptions. However, travelers may reject overly long paths as alternative paths when their primarily used paths become unavailable, and the travel time tolerance of alternative paths has not been extensively explored. This study investigates travel time tolerance in car journeys along alternative paths and applies survival analysis theory to address two fundamental questions: “What main factors influence the tolerance?” and “How to estimate the tolerance?”. Tolerance herein refers to the maximum additional travel time accepted by travelers for alternative paths compared to the shortest path travel time. A national survey of over 2,500 valid responses from 305 cities across China reveals statistically significant results: (1) commuters generally exhibit lower tolerance than non-commuters; (2) travelers in developing areas show higher tolerance than those in metropolitan areas; (3) tolerance typically increases with travel distance; and (4) personal attributes such as age, gender, income, travel mode, and commuting duration also influence tolerance. To address complexities of these influences, we propose universal estimation methods using non-linear fitting and accelerated failure time models from both aggregated and disaggregated perspectives. These methods enable to quantify the number of alternative paths within travelers’ tolerance based on city specifics and travelers’ information. This study helps in planning alternative paths that are potentially acceptable to travelers and enhances understanding of travelers’ behavior under disruptions, leading to better road network resilience assessment.
道路网络中可选路径的旅行时间容忍度:一项全国调查研究
为旅客提供合理数量的可选择路径对于提高交通网络对中断的恢复能力非常重要。然而,当主要使用的路径不可用时,旅行者可能会拒绝过长的路径作为替代路径,而替代路径的旅行时间容限尚未得到广泛的探索。本研究调查了汽车在不同路径上的出行时间容忍度,并运用生存分析理论解决了两个基本问题:“影响容忍度的主要因素是什么?”和“如何估计容忍度?”这里的容差是指相对于最短路径旅行时间,旅行者在可选路径上所能接受的最大额外旅行时间。一项针对中国305个城市的2500多份有效问卷的全国性调查显示了具有统计学意义的结果:(1)通勤者的容忍度普遍低于非通勤者;②发达地区游客的容忍度高于大都市地区;(3)容忍度随行程的增加而增大;(4)年龄、性别、收入、出行方式、通勤时间等个人属性对容忍度也有影响。为了解决这些影响的复杂性,我们从聚合和分解的角度提出了使用非线性拟合和加速失效时间模型的通用估计方法。这些方法可以根据城市特点和旅行者的信息,在旅行者的容忍度范围内量化可选择路径的数量。这项研究有助于规划可能被旅行者接受的替代路径,并增强对中断下旅行者行为的理解,从而更好地评估道路网络的弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信