Research on the Analysis Method of Asteroid Impact Probability

Q4 Physics and Astronomy
Zheng Hang , Zhu Qing-feng , Song Ye-zhi , Li Xu-zhi , Xu Xiao-hui , Qiu Jin-sheng , Zhao Jun-han
{"title":"Research on the Analysis Method of Asteroid Impact Probability","authors":"Zheng Hang ,&nbsp;Zhu Qing-feng ,&nbsp;Song Ye-zhi ,&nbsp;Li Xu-zhi ,&nbsp;Xu Xiao-hui ,&nbsp;Qiu Jin-sheng ,&nbsp;Zhao Jun-han","doi":"10.1016/j.chinastron.2025.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In view of the current situation of inconsistent conclusions among existing asteroid impact monitoring systems, the linear approximation method used in the change line impact monitoring system was studied, and the conclusion is achieved that the deviation of the orbit distribution relative to the theoretical orbit distribution obtained by this method gradually became significant as the orbit propagation time increased. The impact probability of 6 asteroid instances was calculated using the Monte Carlo method. Compared with the results of the existing Monte Carlo impact monitoring system, the maximum difference is 2.1 times the standard deviation. The impact samples of asteroid 2020 VV in October 2056 are analyzed in detail, and the distribution of impact samples with time and space is depicted, and the conclusions are consistent with those of existing impact monitoring systems. As for the comparison between the different impact monitoring systems, it is concluded that the Monte Carlo impact monitoring system and the change line impact monitoring system currently have their own advantages and disadvantages: the former does not introduce the error caused by the linear approximation method, but the computational cost is high. The linear approximation method used in the latter will bring errors, but it can find some virtual impact sources with low impact probability that may be missed by the former, and the computational cost is relatively low.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35730,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics","volume":"49 3","pages":"Pages 565-578"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275106225000827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In view of the current situation of inconsistent conclusions among existing asteroid impact monitoring systems, the linear approximation method used in the change line impact monitoring system was studied, and the conclusion is achieved that the deviation of the orbit distribution relative to the theoretical orbit distribution obtained by this method gradually became significant as the orbit propagation time increased. The impact probability of 6 asteroid instances was calculated using the Monte Carlo method. Compared with the results of the existing Monte Carlo impact monitoring system, the maximum difference is 2.1 times the standard deviation. The impact samples of asteroid 2020 VV in October 2056 are analyzed in detail, and the distribution of impact samples with time and space is depicted, and the conclusions are consistent with those of existing impact monitoring systems. As for the comparison between the different impact monitoring systems, it is concluded that the Monte Carlo impact monitoring system and the change line impact monitoring system currently have their own advantages and disadvantages: the former does not introduce the error caused by the linear approximation method, but the computational cost is high. The linear approximation method used in the latter will bring errors, but it can find some virtual impact sources with low impact probability that may be missed by the former, and the computational cost is relatively low.
小行星撞击概率分析方法研究
针对现有小行星撞击监测系统结论不一致的现状,研究了变化线撞击监测系统中使用的线性逼近方法,得出随着轨道传播时间的增加,该方法得到的轨道分布相对于理论轨道分布的偏差逐渐显著的结论。利用蒙特卡罗方法计算了6颗小行星的撞击概率。与现有蒙特卡罗冲击监测系统的结果相比,最大差异为标准差的2.1倍。对2056年10月小行星2020vv的撞击样本进行了详细分析,描绘了撞击样本随时间和空间的分布,所得结论与现有撞击监测系统的结果一致。对于不同冲击监测系统的比较,得出蒙特卡罗冲击监测系统与变化线冲击监测系统目前各有优缺点:前者不引入线性逼近法带来的误差,但计算成本较高。后者采用的线性逼近方法会带来误差,但它能找到一些虚拟冲击源,其冲击概率较低,而前者可能会忽略这些虚拟冲击源,并且计算成本相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics
Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics Physics and Astronomy-Astronomy and Astrophysics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The vigorous growth of astronomical and astrophysical science in China led to an increase in papers on astrophysics which Acta Astronomica Sinica could no longer absorb. Translations of papers from two new journals the Chinese Journal of Space Science and Acta Astrophysica Sinica are added to the translation of Acta Astronomica Sinica to form the new journal Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics. Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics brings English translations of notable articles to astronomers and astrophysicists outside China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信