Mechanisms of subjective (sensory) irritation. Propensity to non-immunologic contact urticaria and objective irritation in stingers.

K Lammintausta, H I Maibach, D Wilson
{"title":"Mechanisms of subjective (sensory) irritation. Propensity to non-immunologic contact urticaria and objective irritation in stingers.","authors":"K Lammintausta,&nbsp;H I Maibach,&nbsp;D Wilson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subjective (sensory) irritation was studied with lactic acid test on 74 females; 8 reacted positively with \"stinging\" and/or itching or burning and another 5 had mild subjective sensations. History of previous corresponding sensations from contact with cosmetic products was significantly more common in stingers than in non-stingers (p less than 0.001); other factors, such as dermatologic history, sensitivity to ultraviolet light or skin dryness had no characteristic patterns. In the objective, immediate non-immunologic contact urticaria tests with sorbic acid and benzoic acid, the stingers developed significantly more erythema to 0.5% sorbic acid (p less than 0.05) and to 1% benzoic acid (p less than 0.02). 1% sorbic acid also induced more edema in stingers (p less than 0.02). Increased reactivity to a 24 h sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) patch test was demonstrated only with laser Doppler velocimetry (p less than 0.05). Stingers and non-stingers reacted similarly to open, cumulative SLS irritation as measured with transepidermal water loss. These studies provide clinical and biological information about subjective irritation; the data suggest a functional correlation for the what had been considered a purely subjective (sensory) phenomena.</p>","PeriodicalId":11073,"journal":{"name":"Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment","volume":"36 2","pages":"45-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subjective (sensory) irritation was studied with lactic acid test on 74 females; 8 reacted positively with "stinging" and/or itching or burning and another 5 had mild subjective sensations. History of previous corresponding sensations from contact with cosmetic products was significantly more common in stingers than in non-stingers (p less than 0.001); other factors, such as dermatologic history, sensitivity to ultraviolet light or skin dryness had no characteristic patterns. In the objective, immediate non-immunologic contact urticaria tests with sorbic acid and benzoic acid, the stingers developed significantly more erythema to 0.5% sorbic acid (p less than 0.05) and to 1% benzoic acid (p less than 0.02). 1% sorbic acid also induced more edema in stingers (p less than 0.02). Increased reactivity to a 24 h sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) patch test was demonstrated only with laser Doppler velocimetry (p less than 0.05). Stingers and non-stingers reacted similarly to open, cumulative SLS irritation as measured with transepidermal water loss. These studies provide clinical and biological information about subjective irritation; the data suggest a functional correlation for the what had been considered a purely subjective (sensory) phenomena.

主观(感觉)刺激的机制。倾向于非免疫性接触性荨麻疹和客观刺激的毒刺。
采用乳酸试验研究74例女性的主观(感觉)刺激;8人有“刺痛”和/或瘙痒或灼烧的积极反应,另外5人有轻微的主观感觉。与非毒刺患者相比,毒刺患者先前因接触化妆品而产生相应感觉的历史明显更常见(p < 0.001);其他因素,如皮肤病史,对紫外线的敏感性或皮肤干燥没有特征模式。在山梨酸和苯甲酸的直接非免疫性接触性荨麻疹试验中,0.5%山梨酸(p < 0.05)和1%苯甲酸(p < 0.02)的毒刺出现的红斑明显增加。1%山梨酸还能诱导毒刺水肿(p < 0.02)。仅用激光多普勒测速法证实对24 h十二烷基硫酸钠(SLS)贴片试验的反应性增加(p < 0.05)。通过经皮失水测量,刺和非刺对开放的、累积的SLS刺激的反应相似。这些研究提供了关于主观刺激的临床和生物学信息;数据表明,被认为是纯粹主观(感官)现象的功能相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信