Enhancing the shear capacity and ductility of RC beams using a hybrid strengthening system of anchored CFRP sheets and rubber supports: Experimental and numerical investigation

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Walid Mansour , Weiwen Li , Peng Wang , Mohamed Ghalla
{"title":"Enhancing the shear capacity and ductility of RC beams using a hybrid strengthening system of anchored CFRP sheets and rubber supports: Experimental and numerical investigation","authors":"Walid Mansour ,&nbsp;Weiwen Li ,&nbsp;Peng Wang ,&nbsp;Mohamed Ghalla","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past four decades, carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets have been widely used to enhance the ultimate load capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) beams with low shear strength. However, their effectiveness in improving ductility is limited by premature debonding. This study investigates the use of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer–rubber support composites (CFRP-RSC) systems to enhance both load capacity and ductility. Twelve RC beams with shear span-to-depth ratios (a/d) of 1.1, 2.7, and 3.8 were tested under three-point loading. Three strengthening techniques were examined: conventional epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets, epoxy-bonded CFRP-RSC systems, and CFRP-RSC systems anchored with 6.0 mm diameter steel bolts. A 3D ABAQUS model was also developed to generate the load–strain behavior of steel reinforcement and assess ductility under different configurations. The results showed that conventional CFRP sheets experienced partial debonding, whereas CFRP-RSC systems reached rupture strain. Anchored CFRP-RSC systems effectively dispersed major shear cracks into multiple secondary cracks, reducing crack widths compared with conventional CFRP sheets. Beams strengthened with anchored CFRP-RSC systems exhibited ultimate load increases of 13.3 %, 9.3 %, and 21.5 % for a/d ratios of 1.1, 2.7, and 3.8, respectively, compared to their corresponding control beams. Ductility improvements were also significant, with increases of 32.6 %, 46.6 %, and 36.6 %, respectively, over beams strengthened with conventional CFRP sheets. The findings demonstrate that anchored CFRP-RSC systems are more effective than conventional CFRP sheets in simultaneously enhancing both load capacity and ductility of RC beams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 110207"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425020223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past four decades, carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets have been widely used to enhance the ultimate load capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) beams with low shear strength. However, their effectiveness in improving ductility is limited by premature debonding. This study investigates the use of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer–rubber support composites (CFRP-RSC) systems to enhance both load capacity and ductility. Twelve RC beams with shear span-to-depth ratios (a/d) of 1.1, 2.7, and 3.8 were tested under three-point loading. Three strengthening techniques were examined: conventional epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets, epoxy-bonded CFRP-RSC systems, and CFRP-RSC systems anchored with 6.0 mm diameter steel bolts. A 3D ABAQUS model was also developed to generate the load–strain behavior of steel reinforcement and assess ductility under different configurations. The results showed that conventional CFRP sheets experienced partial debonding, whereas CFRP-RSC systems reached rupture strain. Anchored CFRP-RSC systems effectively dispersed major shear cracks into multiple secondary cracks, reducing crack widths compared with conventional CFRP sheets. Beams strengthened with anchored CFRP-RSC systems exhibited ultimate load increases of 13.3 %, 9.3 %, and 21.5 % for a/d ratios of 1.1, 2.7, and 3.8, respectively, compared to their corresponding control beams. Ductility improvements were also significant, with increases of 32.6 %, 46.6 %, and 36.6 %, respectively, over beams strengthened with conventional CFRP sheets. The findings demonstrate that anchored CFRP-RSC systems are more effective than conventional CFRP sheets in simultaneously enhancing both load capacity and ductility of RC beams.
采用锚固碳纤维布和橡胶支撑复合加固系统提高RC梁的抗剪能力和延性:试验和数值研究
在过去的四十年里,碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)板被广泛用于提高低抗剪强度钢筋混凝土(RC)梁的极限承载能力。然而,它们在提高延性方面的有效性受到过早剥离的限制。本研究探讨了碳纤维增强聚合物-橡胶支撑复合材料(CFRP-RSC)系统的使用,以提高载荷能力和延展性。对12根剪跨深比分别为1.1、2.7和3.8的钢筋混凝土梁进行三点加载试验。研究了三种强化技术:常规环氧树脂粘结CFRP片材、环氧树脂粘结CFRP- rsc体系以及用6.0 mm直径钢螺栓锚固CFRP- rsc体系。建立了三维ABAQUS模型,生成了钢筋在不同构型下的荷载-应变特性,并对其延性进行了评估。结果表明:常规CFRP片材出现部分剥离,而CFRP- rsc体系达到断裂应变;锚固CFRP- rsc体系有效地将主要剪切裂缝分散为多个次级裂缝,与传统CFRP板材相比,减小了裂缝宽度。与相应的对照梁相比,锚定CFRP-RSC体系加固梁在a/d比率为1.1、2.7和3.8时,其极限荷载分别增加了13.3 %、9.3 %和21.5 %。延性的改善也很显著,与传统碳纤维布加固的梁相比,分别增加了32.6% %、46.6% %和36.6% %。研究结果表明,锚固CFRP- rsc体系在同时提高RC梁的承载能力和延性方面比传统CFRP板更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信