A. Bellanger , D. Sanchez-Rodriguez , F.K. Youssa Nzintcheu , L. Iconaru , A. Mugisha , J.M.K. De Filette , F. Baleanu , A.-S. Hambye , D. Ene Lenghel , F. Benoit , M. Surquin , P. Bergmann , J.-J. Body
{"title":"Associations between bone mineral density loss in the past decade and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older women—The FRISBEE 2 study","authors":"A. Bellanger , D. Sanchez-Rodriguez , F.K. Youssa Nzintcheu , L. Iconaru , A. Mugisha , J.M.K. De Filette , F. Baleanu , A.-S. Hambye , D. Ene Lenghel , F. Benoit , M. Surquin , P. Bergmann , J.-J. Body","doi":"10.1016/j.rh.2025.100935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the associations between EWGSOP2-defined sarcopenia and bone mineral density (BMD) loss in the past 6–16 years in community-dwelling older women from the <em>Fracture RISk Brussels Epidemiological Enquiry</em> (FRISBEE2) study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective cohort design. Nine hundred seven community-dwelling older women constitute the baseline sample of the FRISBEE2 study. Participants had undergone an initial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) evaluation for osteoporosis in the past 6–16 years prior to the study's commencement and were re-assessed at baseline. Baseline evaluations included EWGSOP2-defined sarcopenia (handgrip strength, appendicular lean soft tissue mass/height<sup>2</sup>, 4-m gait speed) and osteoporosis assessment (total hip BMD). Baseline BMD value of each participant was compared with their own value in the previous DXA evaluation in the past 6–16 years. A BMD loss<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->3.0% threshold was considered as “least significant change”. Adjusted multiple logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between sarcopenia and BMD loss.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 907 participants, 172 (19.0%) had EWGSOP2-defined probable sarcopenia, 76 (8.4%) had confirmed sarcopenia, and 630 (73.2%) experienced significant BMD loss. After adjustment for confounders, regression models showed that BMD loss<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->3% in the past years was associated to twofold higher odds of probable sarcopenia (i.e., low handgrip strength) [OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.23 (95%CI 1.36–3.66); <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study found a clinically relevant association between the presence of sarcopenia and bone loss in the past 6 to 16 years in community-dwelling older women. A significant BMD loss should alert clinicians to the possible coexistence of sarcopenia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39532,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacion","volume":"59 4","pages":"Article 100935"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712025000556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To assess the associations between EWGSOP2-defined sarcopenia and bone mineral density (BMD) loss in the past 6–16 years in community-dwelling older women from the Fracture RISk Brussels Epidemiological Enquiry (FRISBEE2) study.
Methods
Retrospective cohort design. Nine hundred seven community-dwelling older women constitute the baseline sample of the FRISBEE2 study. Participants had undergone an initial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) evaluation for osteoporosis in the past 6–16 years prior to the study's commencement and were re-assessed at baseline. Baseline evaluations included EWGSOP2-defined sarcopenia (handgrip strength, appendicular lean soft tissue mass/height2, 4-m gait speed) and osteoporosis assessment (total hip BMD). Baseline BMD value of each participant was compared with their own value in the previous DXA evaluation in the past 6–16 years. A BMD loss > 3.0% threshold was considered as “least significant change”. Adjusted multiple logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between sarcopenia and BMD loss.
Results
Out of 907 participants, 172 (19.0%) had EWGSOP2-defined probable sarcopenia, 76 (8.4%) had confirmed sarcopenia, and 630 (73.2%) experienced significant BMD loss. After adjustment for confounders, regression models showed that BMD loss > 3% in the past years was associated to twofold higher odds of probable sarcopenia (i.e., low handgrip strength) [OR = 2.23 (95%CI 1.36–3.66); p = 0.002].
Conclusions
The study found a clinically relevant association between the presence of sarcopenia and bone loss in the past 6 to 16 years in community-dwelling older women. A significant BMD loss should alert clinicians to the possible coexistence of sarcopenia.
期刊介绍:
La revista que es desde hace más de 40 años la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación y referente de la mayoría de las Sociedades de la Especialidad de los países americanos de habla hispana. Se publican 5 números pluritemáticos al año y uno monográfico sobre un tema del mayor interés y actualidad designado por el consejo de redacción.