Patient and Stakeholder Collaborative Research: Development of a Community Advisory Board for Nephrology and Transplantation Studies

IF 3.4 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nidhi Ghildayal , Jennifer Scherer , Akanksha Nalatwad , Ilana Mittleman , Jennifer Jones , Valen Keefer , Smiti Nadkarni , Matthew Palmer , Macey L. Levan , Rasheeda Hall , Dorry L. Segev , Mara McAdams-DeMarco
{"title":"Patient and Stakeholder Collaborative Research: Development of a Community Advisory Board for Nephrology and Transplantation Studies","authors":"Nidhi Ghildayal ,&nbsp;Jennifer Scherer ,&nbsp;Akanksha Nalatwad ,&nbsp;Ilana Mittleman ,&nbsp;Jennifer Jones ,&nbsp;Valen Keefer ,&nbsp;Smiti Nadkarni ,&nbsp;Matthew Palmer ,&nbsp;Macey L. Levan ,&nbsp;Rasheeda Hall ,&nbsp;Dorry L. Segev ,&nbsp;Mara McAdams-DeMarco","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2025.101091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Community input enhances the impact of research. Yet, there are challenges when eliciting community perspectives in nephrology/transplant research: recruitment of patients across a wide spectrum of familiarity with kidney disease; a lack of trust from marginalized patients because of health care barriers, institutionalized structural racism, and historical harm; and retention of members facing high burden of care. To address these challenges, we drafted a mission and formed a community advisory board to provide input on nephrology/transplant research. We worked with kidney disease community organizations that prioritize diversity and equity to recruit members with chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, or a kidney transplant, as well as nephrology/transplant caregivers and kidney donors. We formed a diverse group of 9 members and received feedback on 5 research proposals over 4 quarterly meetings, bridging a communication gap between community perspectives and researchers. The collaborative environment stimulated feedback that improved our nephrology/transplant research to reflect the perspectives of those most affected by research findings. Eight members have remained active for more than 1 year. In this collaborative paper, we describe our process of forming a nephrology/transplant community advisory board, and participants highlight the benefits of sharing their lived experiences to improve and amplify the impact of nephrology/transplant research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"7 10","pages":"Article 101091"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259005952500127X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community input enhances the impact of research. Yet, there are challenges when eliciting community perspectives in nephrology/transplant research: recruitment of patients across a wide spectrum of familiarity with kidney disease; a lack of trust from marginalized patients because of health care barriers, institutionalized structural racism, and historical harm; and retention of members facing high burden of care. To address these challenges, we drafted a mission and formed a community advisory board to provide input on nephrology/transplant research. We worked with kidney disease community organizations that prioritize diversity and equity to recruit members with chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, or a kidney transplant, as well as nephrology/transplant caregivers and kidney donors. We formed a diverse group of 9 members and received feedback on 5 research proposals over 4 quarterly meetings, bridging a communication gap between community perspectives and researchers. The collaborative environment stimulated feedback that improved our nephrology/transplant research to reflect the perspectives of those most affected by research findings. Eight members have remained active for more than 1 year. In this collaborative paper, we describe our process of forming a nephrology/transplant community advisory board, and participants highlight the benefits of sharing their lived experiences to improve and amplify the impact of nephrology/transplant research.
患者和利益相关者合作研究:肾脏病和移植研究社区咨询委员会的发展
社区的投入增强了研究的影响。然而,在肾病学/移植研究中,激发社区观点存在挑战:招募对肾脏疾病熟悉程度广泛的患者;由于卫生保健障碍、制度化的结构性种族主义和历史伤害,边缘化患者缺乏信任;以及保留面临高额护理负担的成员。为了应对这些挑战,我们起草了一份使命,并成立了一个社区咨询委员会,为肾脏学/移植研究提供意见。我们与肾病社区组织合作,优先考虑多样性和公平性,以招募患有慢性肾病、终末期肾病或肾脏移植的成员,以及肾脏学/移植护理人员和肾脏捐赠者。我们组成了一个由9名成员组成的多元化小组,并在4次季度会议上收到了5项研究建议的反馈,弥合了社区观点和研究人员之间的沟通差距。协作环境激发了反馈,改善了我们的肾脏病/移植研究,以反映受研究结果影响最大的人的观点。有8名成员至今仍活跃超过1年。在这篇合作论文中,我们描述了我们组建肾脏学/移植社区顾问委员会的过程,参与者强调了分享他们的生活经验对改善和扩大肾脏学/移植研究的影响的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信