Optimal near-perilune maneuvers in powered lunar flybys to distant retrograde orbits

IF 3.4 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Qingqing Li, Nan Zhang, Fanghua Jiang, Junfeng Li
{"title":"Optimal near-perilune maneuvers in powered lunar flybys to distant retrograde orbits","authors":"Qingqing Li,&nbsp;Nan Zhang,&nbsp;Fanghua Jiang,&nbsp;Junfeng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Powered Lunar Flyby (PLF) is an orbital transfer technique in which a maneuver is performed during a lunar gravity assist to reduce mission fuel consumption. However, the commonly adopted strategy in PLF involves applying an impulsive thrust along the direction of velocity at the perilune. This paper examines the efficiency of this conventional perilune maneuver and investigates the optimal near-perilune maneuver by considering both the maneuver location and impulse direction as free variables. The analysis is conducted within the scenario of a spacecraft departing from a low Earth orbit (LEO) to rendezvous with a space station positioned in a lunar distant retrograde orbit (DRO) using a three-impulse trajectory optimization method. The main findings of this research include: (1) Far-side and near-side PLF trajectories are identified. For far-side PLFs, there exists a certain DRO phase angle under which the optimal maneuver position is at the perilune, while for near-side PLFs, the optimal maneuver is always not at the perilune. (2) The velocity increments for perilune and near-perilune maneuvers are similar when the DRO phase angle is near optimal, but can differ by up to 207 m/s when the phase angle deviates significantly from the optimal value. (3) In scenarios with a fixed transfer duration, not restricting the DRO insertion angle to the phase angle will help reduce the velocity increment. The results provide strategic guidance for the optimization of PLF maneuvers and valuable insights for reducing the fuel consumption in future practical missions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44971,"journal":{"name":"Acta Astronautica","volume":"238 ","pages":"Pages 467-477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Astronautica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576525005831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Powered Lunar Flyby (PLF) is an orbital transfer technique in which a maneuver is performed during a lunar gravity assist to reduce mission fuel consumption. However, the commonly adopted strategy in PLF involves applying an impulsive thrust along the direction of velocity at the perilune. This paper examines the efficiency of this conventional perilune maneuver and investigates the optimal near-perilune maneuver by considering both the maneuver location and impulse direction as free variables. The analysis is conducted within the scenario of a spacecraft departing from a low Earth orbit (LEO) to rendezvous with a space station positioned in a lunar distant retrograde orbit (DRO) using a three-impulse trajectory optimization method. The main findings of this research include: (1) Far-side and near-side PLF trajectories are identified. For far-side PLFs, there exists a certain DRO phase angle under which the optimal maneuver position is at the perilune, while for near-side PLFs, the optimal maneuver is always not at the perilune. (2) The velocity increments for perilune and near-perilune maneuvers are similar when the DRO phase angle is near optimal, but can differ by up to 207 m/s when the phase angle deviates significantly from the optimal value. (3) In scenarios with a fixed transfer duration, not restricting the DRO insertion angle to the phase angle will help reduce the velocity increment. The results provide strategic guidance for the optimization of PLF maneuvers and valuable insights for reducing the fuel consumption in future practical missions.
动力月球飞掠到遥远逆行轨道的最佳近月机动
动力月球飞越(PLF)是一种轨道转移技术,在月球重力辅助下进行机动以减少任务燃料消耗。然而,在PLF中通常采用的策略是在近月处沿速度方向施加脉冲推力。本文检验了这种传统的近月机动的有效性,并在考虑机动位置和脉冲方向为自由变量的情况下,研究了最优的近月机动。以航天器从低地球轨道(LEO)出发,与位于月球远地逆行轨道(DRO)的空间站交会为例,采用三脉冲轨迹优化方法进行了分析。本研究的主要成果包括:(1)确定了远侧和近侧PLF轨迹。对于远端PLFs,存在一定的DRO相位角,在此相位角下,最优机动位置在近端,而对于近端PLFs,最优机动位置总是不在近端。(2)当DRO相位角接近最优值时,近月机动和近月机动的速度增量基本一致,但当相位角明显偏离最优值时,速度增量相差可达207 m/s。(3)在传递时间固定的情况下,不将DRO插入角限制在相位角内,有利于降低速度增量。研究结果为优化PLF机动提供了战略指导,并为未来实际任务中降低燃料消耗提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Astronautica
Acta Astronautica 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
22.90%
发文量
599
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Acta Astronautica is sponsored by the International Academy of Astronautics. Content is based on original contributions in all fields of basic, engineering, life and social space sciences and of space technology related to: The peaceful scientific exploration of space, Its exploitation for human welfare and progress, Conception, design, development and operation of space-borne and Earth-based systems, In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes selected proceedings of the annual International Astronautical Congress (IAC), transactions of the IAA and special issues on topics of current interest, such as microgravity, space station technology, geostationary orbits, and space economics. Other subject areas include satellite technology, space transportation and communications, space energy, power and propulsion, astrodynamics, extraterrestrial intelligence and Earth observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信