Febe De Geest , Jane Dyson , Sara Guest , Craig Jeffrey , Gyorgy Scrinis
{"title":"‘It has a life’: Youth revaluing food ‘waste’ at an Australian university","authors":"Febe De Geest , Jane Dyson , Sara Guest , Craig Jeffrey , Gyorgy Scrinis","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scholars have increasingly paid attention to addressing food insecurity and environmental concerns through redistributing surplus food. Some scholars argue that surplus food initiatives may inadvertently reinforce existing structures that generate food waste and, to some extent, reproduce social inequalities and the power of corporate entities. However, there have been relatively few studies of whether and how surplus food initiatives provide value in people’s lives. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted with volunteers participating in Food Centre, an Australian university-based food initiative redistributing ‘rescued’ groceries, this study highlights the value of surplus food initiatives and how young people interpret them. While young people were sceptical about these initiatives for their potential to reproduce existing inequalities, they also suggested that such initiatives offered spaces for learning and socialising. Firstly, the surplus food initiative provided a space for students to ease some of the emotions they felt while accessing food relief. Participants also viewed the Food Centre as a platform for disseminating practical knowledge on recycling and reshaping societal perceptions of waste, aligning with their ethical commitments. In addition, the food rescue initiative provided a social space for young people to build community. Thus, surplus food redistribution schemes may not unsettle dominant food systems, but they might provide meaning to marginalised young people.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001671852500209X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Scholars have increasingly paid attention to addressing food insecurity and environmental concerns through redistributing surplus food. Some scholars argue that surplus food initiatives may inadvertently reinforce existing structures that generate food waste and, to some extent, reproduce social inequalities and the power of corporate entities. However, there have been relatively few studies of whether and how surplus food initiatives provide value in people’s lives. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted with volunteers participating in Food Centre, an Australian university-based food initiative redistributing ‘rescued’ groceries, this study highlights the value of surplus food initiatives and how young people interpret them. While young people were sceptical about these initiatives for their potential to reproduce existing inequalities, they also suggested that such initiatives offered spaces for learning and socialising. Firstly, the surplus food initiative provided a space for students to ease some of the emotions they felt while accessing food relief. Participants also viewed the Food Centre as a platform for disseminating practical knowledge on recycling and reshaping societal perceptions of waste, aligning with their ethical commitments. In addition, the food rescue initiative provided a social space for young people to build community. Thus, surplus food redistribution schemes may not unsettle dominant food systems, but they might provide meaning to marginalised young people.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.