Twisting like a cabbage worm: The politics of enacting sustainable futures through energy communities

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Fredrik Envall , J. Daniel Andersson , Johanna Liljenfeldt
{"title":"Twisting like a cabbage worm: The politics of enacting sustainable futures through energy communities","authors":"Fredrik Envall ,&nbsp;J. Daniel Andersson ,&nbsp;Johanna Liljenfeldt","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2019, the European Union launched a set of eight legislative acts called the Clean Energy Package, which<!--> <!-->introduced energy communities as a formal actor in its regulatory framework. Often defined as the cooperative production and management of energy through civic engagement,<!--> <!-->high hopes have been pinned on energy communities to serve as instruments for realizing fundamental ideals of energy democracy. Although it has been recognized that energy communities are fraught enterprises that involve multiple actors and cut across geographic scales and vertical levels of policy and politics, surprisingly little attention has been paid to the processes through which they take shape. In this paper, we approach energy community<!--> <!-->initiatives as sociotechnical configurations, examining how<!--> <!-->actors, technologies, and institutions<!--> <!-->are assembled, drawn into relation, and held together in collective efforts to shape the future. Our locus is two energy communities under configuration in the Swedish energy landscape: one part of a climate-smart urban planning project in the city of Örebro, and one in the sparsely populated rural countryside on the island of Gotland. By treating the configuration of energy communities<!--> <!-->as place-based enactments of sustainable futures, we<!--> <!-->illustrate<!--> <!-->how the prospects of community energy are shaped in practice and illuminate<!--> <!-->the composition of power that permeates the politics of future-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104411"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525002118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2019, the European Union launched a set of eight legislative acts called the Clean Energy Package, which introduced energy communities as a formal actor in its regulatory framework. Often defined as the cooperative production and management of energy through civic engagement, high hopes have been pinned on energy communities to serve as instruments for realizing fundamental ideals of energy democracy. Although it has been recognized that energy communities are fraught enterprises that involve multiple actors and cut across geographic scales and vertical levels of policy and politics, surprisingly little attention has been paid to the processes through which they take shape. In this paper, we approach energy community initiatives as sociotechnical configurations, examining how actors, technologies, and institutions are assembled, drawn into relation, and held together in collective efforts to shape the future. Our locus is two energy communities under configuration in the Swedish energy landscape: one part of a climate-smart urban planning project in the city of Örebro, and one in the sparsely populated rural countryside on the island of Gotland. By treating the configuration of energy communities as place-based enactments of sustainable futures, we illustrate how the prospects of community energy are shaped in practice and illuminate the composition of power that permeates the politics of future-making.
像卷心菜虫一样扭曲:通过能源社区制定可持续未来的政治
2019年,欧盟推出了一套名为“清洁能源一揽子计划”的八项立法法案,将能源社区作为其监管框架的正式参与者。能源社区通常被定义为通过公民参与合作生产和管理能源,人们对能源社区寄予厚望,希望它能成为实现能源民主基本理想的工具。虽然人们已经认识到,能源社区充满了涉及多个参与者的企业,跨越了地理尺度和政策和政治的垂直层面,但令人惊讶的是,很少有人关注它们形成的过程。在本文中,我们将能源社区倡议视为社会技术配置,研究参与者、技术和机构如何聚集在一起,形成关系,并在共同努力中共同塑造未来。我们的地点是瑞典能源景观中的两个能源社区:一个是Örebro城市气候智能城市规划项目的一部分,另一个是哥特兰岛上人口稀少的农村地区。通过将能源社区的配置视为可持续未来的基于地点的制定,我们说明了社区能源的前景是如何在实践中形成的,并阐明了渗透到未来制定政治中的权力构成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信