Herbicide Application in Mojave Desert Shrublands: Invasive Grass Reduction, Native Forb Resilience, and Shrub Mortality

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ranae M. Sullivan , Beth A. Newingham
{"title":"Herbicide Application in Mojave Desert Shrublands: Invasive Grass Reduction, Native Forb Resilience, and Shrub Mortality","authors":"Ranae M. Sullivan ,&nbsp;Beth A. Newingham","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2025.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nonnative grasses such as red brome (<em>Bromus rubens</em>) are widespread in the Mojave Desert, causing significant harm to native flora and wildlife habitats. These invasive grasses alter fire cycles, degrade habitats, and reduce biodiversity. We evaluated the effectiveness of proactive herbicide treatments in reducing nonnative grasses in otherwise intact plant communities. Using a split-plot design, we examined how single and twice-applied herbicide applications affect native and nonnative plant communities. Pre-emergent herbicide (imazapic) was aerially applied at four sites in Gold Butte National Monument in fall 2019, with an additional application on a portion of each plot in fall 2020, resulting in once- and twice-treated sections. Vegetation was monitored during the 2020–2022 growing seasons to track changes in nonnative grass cover, annual forb cover, and shrub cover. Initial treatments reduced <em>B. rubens</em> cover in 2020 by as much as 6.3% ± 1.2%, but effects diminished in subsequent years. Twice-applied treatments did not show further reduction until the second year. Native forbs decreased by as much as 2.9% ± 0.6% after the first treatment but recovered in following years. Shrub cover was unaffected overall, though drought-induced <em>Ambrosia dumosa</em> mortality was greater in imazapic treated plots. Although imazapic initially reduced <em>B. rubens</em> cover, severe drought that began in 2020 reduced the emergence of annual plants, potentially negating or masking the herbicide’s benefits. Furthermore, increased drought-induced mortality of a foundational shrub in twice-applied treatments suggests a significant tradeoff with treatments intended to reduce invasive grasses. This study highlights the need for timing pre-emergent herbicide treatments with adequate precipitation to enhance their efficacy. Effective management of invasive grasses requires a proactive approach, considering both treatment timing and environmental conditions to sustain native plant communities and prevent habitat degradation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":"103 ","pages":"Pages 184-195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742425001125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonnative grasses such as red brome (Bromus rubens) are widespread in the Mojave Desert, causing significant harm to native flora and wildlife habitats. These invasive grasses alter fire cycles, degrade habitats, and reduce biodiversity. We evaluated the effectiveness of proactive herbicide treatments in reducing nonnative grasses in otherwise intact plant communities. Using a split-plot design, we examined how single and twice-applied herbicide applications affect native and nonnative plant communities. Pre-emergent herbicide (imazapic) was aerially applied at four sites in Gold Butte National Monument in fall 2019, with an additional application on a portion of each plot in fall 2020, resulting in once- and twice-treated sections. Vegetation was monitored during the 2020–2022 growing seasons to track changes in nonnative grass cover, annual forb cover, and shrub cover. Initial treatments reduced B. rubens cover in 2020 by as much as 6.3% ± 1.2%, but effects diminished in subsequent years. Twice-applied treatments did not show further reduction until the second year. Native forbs decreased by as much as 2.9% ± 0.6% after the first treatment but recovered in following years. Shrub cover was unaffected overall, though drought-induced Ambrosia dumosa mortality was greater in imazapic treated plots. Although imazapic initially reduced B. rubens cover, severe drought that began in 2020 reduced the emergence of annual plants, potentially negating or masking the herbicide’s benefits. Furthermore, increased drought-induced mortality of a foundational shrub in twice-applied treatments suggests a significant tradeoff with treatments intended to reduce invasive grasses. This study highlights the need for timing pre-emergent herbicide treatments with adequate precipitation to enhance their efficacy. Effective management of invasive grasses requires a proactive approach, considering both treatment timing and environmental conditions to sustain native plant communities and prevent habitat degradation.
除草剂在莫哈韦沙漠灌丛地的应用:入侵草减少、乡土牧草恢复力和灌木死亡率
红雀麦(Bromus rubens)等非本地草在莫哈韦沙漠中广泛分布,对本地植物群和野生动物栖息地造成了重大危害。这些入侵的草改变了火的循环,破坏了栖息地,减少了生物多样性。我们评估了主动除草剂处理在其他完整植物群落中减少外源草的有效性。采用分块设计,我们研究了单次和两次使用除草剂对本地和非本地植物群落的影响。2019年秋季,在金丘国家纪念碑的四个地点空中施用了发芽前除草剂(imazapic),并于2020年秋季在每个地块的一部分额外施用了一次和两次处理的部分。在2020-2022年生长季节对植被进行监测,以跟踪非本土草覆盖、一年生牧草覆盖和灌木覆盖的变化。初步治疗在2020年使鲁本芽孢杆菌的覆盖率降低了6.3%±1.2%,但随后几年的效果逐渐减弱。两次治疗直到第二年才显示出进一步的减少。原生牧草在第一次处理后减少了2.9%±0.6%,但随后几年有所恢复。灌木覆盖总体上未受影响,尽管干旱诱导的沙棘死亡率在异氮处理地块更高。尽管imazapic最初减少了B. rubens的覆盖,但2020年开始的严重干旱减少了一年生植物的出现,可能会抵消或掩盖除草剂的好处。此外,在两次施用处理中,基础灌木的干旱死亡率增加,这表明与旨在减少入侵草的处理之间存在重大权衡。本研究强调需要在降水充足的情况下及时进行除草剂处理,以提高其效果。有效管理入侵草需要积极主动的方法,考虑处理时间和环境条件,以维持本地植物群落和防止栖息地退化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Rangeland Ecology & Management 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes. Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信