Validation of in vivo QT ICH E14/S7B Q&A guidance in minipig

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Rachael Hardman , Joyce Obeng , Jill Nichols , Karim Melliti
{"title":"Validation of in vivo QT ICH E14/S7B Q&A guidance in minipig","authors":"Rachael Hardman ,&nbsp;Joyce Obeng ,&nbsp;Jill Nichols ,&nbsp;Karim Melliti","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2025.107778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The E14/S7B Q&amp;A guidelines introduce the concept of “double negative” (negative hERG and negative in vivo QTc) non-clinical data which can be used along with negative Phase 1 clinical QTc data to substitute for a clinical Thorough QT study in specific cases (Q&amp;As 5.1 and 6.1). The non-clinical data are to be generated using “best practice” designs in order to support data quality and consistency across the industry. For the in vivo QT assay, best practice recommendations require characterization of individual study sensitivity, verification of independence QTc from heart rate, demonstration of test facility sensitivity and pharmacological translation to human using a positive control. We have previously validated E14/S7B Q&amp;A compliant in vivo QT assays in dog and non-human primate. The objective of this work was to perform the validation in the minipig as the third non-rodent species commonly used for cardiovascular safety assessment. A positive control telemetry study was performed with moxifloxacin (30, 120, 300 mg/kg) using a double Latin square crossover study design (<em>n</em> = 8), followed by an ascending dose design (<em>n</em> = 5). A single PK sample was drawn during the telemetry phase, and a separate full PK phase was included at all dose levels for PK/PD assessment to determine translation to human. Moxifloxacin-induced increases in QTc were observed, with a maximal increase at the highest dose of 86 and 67 msec for the double cross-over and ascending dose designs, respectively. Smallest statistically detectable differences (SSDD) for QTc were 11 msec for the double cross-over and 10 msec for the ascending dose design. Based on the free plasma exposures and magnitude of the QTc effects from the crossover data, a 10 msec effect was observed at 0.77× of the free moxifloxacin concentration known to produce a 10 msec QTc effect in human. In conclusion, we have validated an E14/S7B Q&amp;A compliant in vivo QT assay in the minipig for both cross-over and ascending dose designs and shown good translation to human, completing the Labcorp™ offering for in-vivo E14/S7B Q&amp;A compliant studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 107778"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871925001984","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The E14/S7B Q&A guidelines introduce the concept of “double negative” (negative hERG and negative in vivo QTc) non-clinical data which can be used along with negative Phase 1 clinical QTc data to substitute for a clinical Thorough QT study in specific cases (Q&As 5.1 and 6.1). The non-clinical data are to be generated using “best practice” designs in order to support data quality and consistency across the industry. For the in vivo QT assay, best practice recommendations require characterization of individual study sensitivity, verification of independence QTc from heart rate, demonstration of test facility sensitivity and pharmacological translation to human using a positive control. We have previously validated E14/S7B Q&A compliant in vivo QT assays in dog and non-human primate. The objective of this work was to perform the validation in the minipig as the third non-rodent species commonly used for cardiovascular safety assessment. A positive control telemetry study was performed with moxifloxacin (30, 120, 300 mg/kg) using a double Latin square crossover study design (n = 8), followed by an ascending dose design (n = 5). A single PK sample was drawn during the telemetry phase, and a separate full PK phase was included at all dose levels for PK/PD assessment to determine translation to human. Moxifloxacin-induced increases in QTc were observed, with a maximal increase at the highest dose of 86 and 67 msec for the double cross-over and ascending dose designs, respectively. Smallest statistically detectable differences (SSDD) for QTc were 11 msec for the double cross-over and 10 msec for the ascending dose design. Based on the free plasma exposures and magnitude of the QTc effects from the crossover data, a 10 msec effect was observed at 0.77× of the free moxifloxacin concentration known to produce a 10 msec QTc effect in human. In conclusion, we have validated an E14/S7B Q&A compliant in vivo QT assay in the minipig for both cross-over and ascending dose designs and shown good translation to human, completing the Labcorp™ offering for in-vivo E14/S7B Q&A compliant studies.
小型猪体内QT ICH E14/S7B问答指南的验证
E14/S7B Q&;A指南引入了“双阴性”(hERG阴性和体内QTc阴性)非临床数据的概念,可与临床1期QTc阴性数据一起使用,以替代特定病例的临床彻底QT研究(Q&As 5.1和6.1)。非临床数据将使用“最佳实践”设计生成,以支持整个行业的数据质量和一致性。对于体内QT测定,最佳实践建议需要对个体研究敏感性进行表征,验证QTc与心率的独立性,证明测试设备的敏感性,并使用阳性对照对人类进行药理学翻译。 我们之前已经在狗和非人灵长类动物中验证了E14/S7B Q&;A符合体内QT测定。这项工作的目的是在小型猪中进行验证,作为第三种非啮齿动物,通常用于心血管安全性评估。采用双拉丁方交叉研究设计(n = 8)对莫西沙星(30、120、300 mg/kg)进行阳性对照遥测研究,然后采用递增剂量设计(n = 5)。在遥测阶段抽取一个单一的PK样本,并在所有剂量水平下包括一个单独的完整的PK阶段,以进行PK/PD评估,以确定对人的转化。 观察到莫西沙星诱导的QTc增加,在双交叉和上升剂量设计中,最高剂量分别为86和67 msec时最大增加。双交叉组QTc的最小统计可检测差异(SSDD)为11 msec,上升剂量组为10 msec。根据自由血浆暴露和交叉数据中QTc效应的大小,在已知产生10 msec QTc效应的游离莫西沙星浓度的0.77倍时,观察到10 msec效应。总之,我们已经在小型猪身上验证了E14/S7B Q&;A兼容的体内QT试验,用于交叉和上升剂量设计,并显示出良好的人类翻译,完成了Labcorp™提供的E14/S7B Q&;A兼容的体内研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信