Intravenous self-administration – Valid experimental designs to evaluate the abuse potential of psychedelics, entactogens and drugs with novel mechanisms

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
David J. Heal , Jane Gosden , Sharon L. Smith
{"title":"Intravenous self-administration – Valid experimental designs to evaluate the abuse potential of psychedelics, entactogens and drugs with novel mechanisms","authors":"David J. Heal ,&nbsp;Jane Gosden ,&nbsp;Sharon L. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2025.107793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intravenous self-administration (IVSA) evaluates whether a CNS drug-candidate produces rewarding effects that could cause psychological dependence in patients and lead to its diversion for abuse. The model was originally developed to investigate powerful reinforcers like opiates and stimulants. For that reason, IVSA is not well adapted to detect the abuse potential of a new generation of drugs with moderate/low abuse potential. Using experience gained from conducting IVSA experiments with many types of drugs of abuse and novel drug-candidates, we offer insights on obtaining translationally predictive results from IVSA experiments, and technical refinements to increase the sensitivity and granularity of the findings. All experiments were conducted in mildly food-restricted, male, Sprague-Dawley rats with implanted with intravenous catheters. Standard IVSA tests were conducted on low fixed ratio (FR) schedules (FR3 or FR5), not FR10 as recommended in CDER/FDA guidance (CDER/FDA, 2017). As a technical refinement, the relative reinforcing effect was assessed by break-point determination on a progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement. All break-points were determined across a range of reinforcing drug doses to ensure the maximum reinforcing effect was identified. Moderate reinforcers, MDMA (entactogen), butorphanol (κ-agonist/μ-partial agonist), and (−)pentazocine (κ-agonist/μ-antagonist) produced break-points between 25 and 33 lever-presses/infusion. Weak reinforcers, WIN55,212 (CB1/CB2 agonist), diazepam, midazolam and methohexital (all GABA-A receptor positive allosteric modulators [PAMs]) produced mean break-points of 17–22 lever-presses/infusion. In contrast, powerful reinforcers like the opioids, eg heroin, remifentanil, oxycodone, and stimulants, eg cocaine, methylphenidate, supported mean break-points ranging between 41 and 98 lever‑presses/infusion. The break-point for saline (non-reinforcing control) was 10.4 ± 0.8 lever-presses/infusion. The results were used to design and conduct successful IVSA evaluations on cannabidiol (CBD), ulotaront and samidorphan on a FR3 schedule, difelikefalin, dasotraline, centanafadine, and soticlestat on a FR5 schedule, and PR/break-point determinations on samidorphan and naloxone. CNS drug development is in an era where new entactogens, psychedelics and drugs with novel mechanisms are undergoing clinical evaluation. Refinements to IVSA testing that we advocate have proven value based on experiments with known substances of abuse and novel drug-candidates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 107793"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871925002138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intravenous self-administration (IVSA) evaluates whether a CNS drug-candidate produces rewarding effects that could cause psychological dependence in patients and lead to its diversion for abuse. The model was originally developed to investigate powerful reinforcers like opiates and stimulants. For that reason, IVSA is not well adapted to detect the abuse potential of a new generation of drugs with moderate/low abuse potential. Using experience gained from conducting IVSA experiments with many types of drugs of abuse and novel drug-candidates, we offer insights on obtaining translationally predictive results from IVSA experiments, and technical refinements to increase the sensitivity and granularity of the findings. All experiments were conducted in mildly food-restricted, male, Sprague-Dawley rats with implanted with intravenous catheters. Standard IVSA tests were conducted on low fixed ratio (FR) schedules (FR3 or FR5), not FR10 as recommended in CDER/FDA guidance (CDER/FDA, 2017). As a technical refinement, the relative reinforcing effect was assessed by break-point determination on a progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement. All break-points were determined across a range of reinforcing drug doses to ensure the maximum reinforcing effect was identified. Moderate reinforcers, MDMA (entactogen), butorphanol (κ-agonist/μ-partial agonist), and (−)pentazocine (κ-agonist/μ-antagonist) produced break-points between 25 and 33 lever-presses/infusion. Weak reinforcers, WIN55,212 (CB1/CB2 agonist), diazepam, midazolam and methohexital (all GABA-A receptor positive allosteric modulators [PAMs]) produced mean break-points of 17–22 lever-presses/infusion. In contrast, powerful reinforcers like the opioids, eg heroin, remifentanil, oxycodone, and stimulants, eg cocaine, methylphenidate, supported mean break-points ranging between 41 and 98 lever‑presses/infusion. The break-point for saline (non-reinforcing control) was 10.4 ± 0.8 lever-presses/infusion. The results were used to design and conduct successful IVSA evaluations on cannabidiol (CBD), ulotaront and samidorphan on a FR3 schedule, difelikefalin, dasotraline, centanafadine, and soticlestat on a FR5 schedule, and PR/break-point determinations on samidorphan and naloxone. CNS drug development is in an era where new entactogens, psychedelics and drugs with novel mechanisms are undergoing clinical evaluation. Refinements to IVSA testing that we advocate have proven value based on experiments with known substances of abuse and novel drug-candidates.
静脉内自我给药——评估致幻剂、致幻剂和具有新机制的药物滥用潜力的有效实验设计
静脉内自我给药(IVSA)评估一种中枢神经系统候选药物是否产生可能引起患者心理依赖并导致其转向滥用的奖励效应。该模型最初是为了研究阿片类药物和兴奋剂等强效强化剂而开发的。因此,IVSA不能很好地适应于检测具有中等/低滥用潜力的新一代药物的滥用潜力。 利用从对多种滥用药物和新型候选药物进行IVSA实验中获得的经验,我们提供了从IVSA实验中获得翻译预测结果的见解,以及技术改进以提高结果的敏感性和粒度。 所有实验均在轻度食物限制的雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠中进行,并植入静脉导管。标准IVSA测试是在低固定比(FR)表(FR3或FR5)上进行的,而不是CDER/FDA指南中推荐的FR10 (CDER/FDA, 2017)。作为一项技术改进,通过 断点确定的渐进比(PR)补强计划来评估相对补强效果。 所有的断点都是在一系列强化药物剂量范围内确定的,以确保确定最大的强化效果。 中等强化剂、MDMA (entacto原)、butorphanol (κ-激动剂/μ-部分激动剂)和(−)pentazocine (κ-激动剂/μ-拮抗剂)在25 - 33次杠杆按压/输注之间产生断点。弱强化剂、win55212 (CB1/CB2激动剂)、地西泮、咪达唑仑和甲氧己ital(均为GABA-A受体阳性变构调节剂[PAMs])产生17-22次杠杆按压/输注的平均断点。相比之下,像阿片类药物(如海洛因、瑞芬太尼、羟考酮)和兴奋剂(如可卡因、哌醋甲酯)这样的强效强化剂支持41 - 98次杠杆按压/输注之间的平均断点。生理盐水(非强化对照)的断点为10.4 ± 0.8杠杆按压/输注。结果用于设计并进行成功的IVSA评估大麻二酚(CBD), ulotaront和samidorphan (FR3),异花素,dasotraline, centanafadine和soticlestat (FR5),以及samidorphan和naloxone的PR/断点测定。 中枢神经系统药物开发正处于一个新的致幻剂、致幻剂和具有新机制的药物正在进行临床评估的时代。我们提倡的IVSA测试的改进已经通过对已知滥用物质和新型候选药物的实验证明了其价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信