A state-of-the-art method for high-throughput, automated locomotor activity testing in neuropharmacology, safety, and toxicology studies

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Troy Velie , Kathryn Nichols , Kara Mendiola , Kimberly White , Kim Swearingen , Francesco Mannara , Anil Mehendale , Guinevere Bell , Mike Girand , Chris Kolin , Julio Alvarez , Evelyne Cel , Dilshan S. Harischandra , Sarah A. Beck
{"title":"A state-of-the-art method for high-throughput, automated locomotor activity testing in neuropharmacology, safety, and toxicology studies","authors":"Troy Velie ,&nbsp;Kathryn Nichols ,&nbsp;Kara Mendiola ,&nbsp;Kimberly White ,&nbsp;Kim Swearingen ,&nbsp;Francesco Mannara ,&nbsp;Anil Mehendale ,&nbsp;Guinevere Bell ,&nbsp;Mike Girand ,&nbsp;Chris Kolin ,&nbsp;Julio Alvarez ,&nbsp;Evelyne Cel ,&nbsp;Dilshan S. Harischandra ,&nbsp;Sarah A. Beck","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2025.107795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The quantification of spontaneous locomotor activity, stereotyped movements, anxiety-related behavior, and exploration parameters is pivotal in neuropharmacology, safety, and neurotoxicity studies to determine whether new chemical entities possess psychostimulant, sedative, or toxic effects. Such studies may involve large-scale assessments of locomotor activity in rodents under GLP compliance, which can be labor-intensive and time-consuming. To address these challenges, we have developed the VivaMARS system for automated, high-throughput (up to 30 subjects by session) locomotor activity testing in rodents. This study aims to validate the VivaMARS platform with two reference compounds: caffeine (CAF), which is known to increase rodent activity, and chlorpromazine (CPZ), which is known to decrease rodent activity. Experiments utilized healthy adult Sprague Dawley® male rats (7–8 weeks old, 250–300 g) and CD1 male mice (six weeks old, 25–30 g). Animals were divided in 5 groups (<em>N</em> = 4 each): saline, low-dose, or high-dose groups for two reference compounds. CAF (low 4 mg/kg and high 16 mg/kg for both mice and rats) and CPZ (low 3 mg/kg and high 10 mg/kg for both mice and rats) were administered intraperitoneally. Data was recorded for 60 min immediately after CAF administration and 30 min after CPZ administration. The parameters quantified were total activity, subdivided into activity with displacement (ActiD) and without displacement (ActiND), distance travelled, vertical activity, immobility time, and speed characterization. Data were acquired and analyzed using the GLP-compliant Ponemah software. Table 1 details the effects of CAF and CPZ on measured parameters in mice and rats. In brief, a dose-dependent effect on ActiD was observed in both species after CAF (increase) and CPZ (decrease) administration. CAF-treated rodents travelled longer and CPZ-treated shorter distances compared to saline. As expected, CAF reduced, and CPZ increased immobility time in both mice and rats. CAF increased vertical activity in both species, while CPZ reduced vertical activity. The average speed was higher in CAF-treated animals and lower in CPZ-treated animals. Our data demonstrates that VivaMARS is a powerful platform for acute locomotor activity testing in rodents. Further experiments are needed for a more comprehensive validation of the instrument.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 107795"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871925002151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quantification of spontaneous locomotor activity, stereotyped movements, anxiety-related behavior, and exploration parameters is pivotal in neuropharmacology, safety, and neurotoxicity studies to determine whether new chemical entities possess psychostimulant, sedative, or toxic effects. Such studies may involve large-scale assessments of locomotor activity in rodents under GLP compliance, which can be labor-intensive and time-consuming. To address these challenges, we have developed the VivaMARS system for automated, high-throughput (up to 30 subjects by session) locomotor activity testing in rodents. This study aims to validate the VivaMARS platform with two reference compounds: caffeine (CAF), which is known to increase rodent activity, and chlorpromazine (CPZ), which is known to decrease rodent activity. Experiments utilized healthy adult Sprague Dawley® male rats (7–8 weeks old, 250–300 g) and CD1 male mice (six weeks old, 25–30 g). Animals were divided in 5 groups (N = 4 each): saline, low-dose, or high-dose groups for two reference compounds. CAF (low 4 mg/kg and high 16 mg/kg for both mice and rats) and CPZ (low 3 mg/kg and high 10 mg/kg for both mice and rats) were administered intraperitoneally. Data was recorded for 60 min immediately after CAF administration and 30 min after CPZ administration. The parameters quantified were total activity, subdivided into activity with displacement (ActiD) and without displacement (ActiND), distance travelled, vertical activity, immobility time, and speed characterization. Data were acquired and analyzed using the GLP-compliant Ponemah software. Table 1 details the effects of CAF and CPZ on measured parameters in mice and rats. In brief, a dose-dependent effect on ActiD was observed in both species after CAF (increase) and CPZ (decrease) administration. CAF-treated rodents travelled longer and CPZ-treated shorter distances compared to saline. As expected, CAF reduced, and CPZ increased immobility time in both mice and rats. CAF increased vertical activity in both species, while CPZ reduced vertical activity. The average speed was higher in CAF-treated animals and lower in CPZ-treated animals. Our data demonstrates that VivaMARS is a powerful platform for acute locomotor activity testing in rodents. Further experiments are needed for a more comprehensive validation of the instrument.
一种在神经药理学、安全性和毒理学研究中用于高通量、自动化运动活动测试的最先进方法
自发运动活动、刻板动作、焦虑相关行为和探索参数的量化在神经药理学、安全性和神经毒性研究中至关重要,以确定新的化学实体是否具有精神兴奋、镇静或毒性作用。此类研究可能涉及对GLP依从性啮齿类动物的运动活动进行大规模评估,这可能是劳动密集型和耗时的。为了解决这些挑战,我们开发了VivaMARS系统,用于自动,高通量(每次多达30个受试者)啮齿动物的运动活动测试。本研究旨在用两种参比化合物验证VivaMARS平台:咖啡因(CAF),已知会增加啮齿动物的活性,氯丙嗪(CPZ),已知会降低啮齿动物的活性。实验采用健康成年Sprague Dawley®雄性大鼠(7-8 周龄,250-300 g)和CD1雄性小鼠(6周龄,25-30 g)。将动物分为5组(N = 每组4只):生理盐水组、低剂量组和高剂量组。腹腔注射CAF(小鼠和大鼠低4 mg/kg,高16 mg/kg)和CPZ(小鼠和大鼠低3 mg/kg,高10 mg/kg)。记录CAF给药后60 min和CPZ给药后30 min的数据。量化的参数包括总活动性,再细分为有位移活动性(ActiD)和无位移活动性(ActiND)、移动距离、垂直活动性、静止时间和速度表征。使用符合glp标准的Ponemah软件采集和分析数据。表1详细描述了CAF和CPZ对小鼠和大鼠测量参数的影响。简而言之,在CAF(增加)和CPZ(减少)给药后,两种物种都观察到ActiD的剂量依赖效应。与生理盐水相比,cafz处理的啮齿动物行走的距离更长,cpz处理的距离更短。正如预期的那样,CAF减少了小鼠和大鼠的不动时间,CPZ增加了小鼠和大鼠的不动时间。CAF增加了两种植物的垂直活性,而CPZ降低了两种植物的垂直活性。cafa处理动物的平均速度较高,cpz处理动物的平均速度较低。我们的数据表明,VivaMARS是一个强大的平台,用于测试啮齿动物的急性运动活动。需要进一步的实验来对仪器进行更全面的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信