James M. Clay , Elizabeth K. Farkouh , Tim Stockwell , Gerald Thomas , Kate Johnston , Timothy S. Naimi
{"title":"The impact of alcohol minimum pricing policies on vulnerable populations and health equity: A rapid review","authors":"James M. Clay , Elizabeth K. Farkouh , Tim Stockwell , Gerald Thomas , Kate Johnston , Timothy S. Naimi","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.105014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Alcohol minimum pricing policies, including minimum unit pricing (MUP), are effective strategies for reducing alcohol consumption and related harm. However, their equity implications remain underexplored. We conducted a rapid review of PubMed and Web of Science, identifying 37 real-world studies assessing the impacts of alcohol minimum pricing. Studies from diverse contexts were synthesised with respect to vulnerable populations and health equity, focusing on consumption, health outcomes, and economic effects. Findings indicate that minimum pricing reduces consumption among people who drink heavily and those in lower socio-economic groups, leading to disproportionate declines in alcohol-related mortality, hospitalisations, and conditions such as liver disease. The greatest health gains occurred among populations experiencing poverty, social marginalization, or alcohol use disorder, highlighting potential to promote health equity. People who drink at low volumes were minimally affected, and substitution effects - such as increased use of non-beverage alcohol or other drugs - were negligible. Purchasing patterns shifted from high-risk, low-cost alcohol products to lower-risk alternatives. Concerns about other unintended consequences, including displacement of essential spending or increased crime, are not strongly supported by current evidence, though isolated findings suggest individuals with severe alcohol use disorder may face challenges. Complementary measures, such as Managed Alcohol Programmes, could mitigate these effects. This review underscores the potential of MUP as a public health strategy that both reduces alcohol-related harm and advances health equity. Further research should examine long-term effects on vulnerable populations and broader outcomes, such as social mobility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 105014"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095539592500310X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Alcohol minimum pricing policies, including minimum unit pricing (MUP), are effective strategies for reducing alcohol consumption and related harm. However, their equity implications remain underexplored. We conducted a rapid review of PubMed and Web of Science, identifying 37 real-world studies assessing the impacts of alcohol minimum pricing. Studies from diverse contexts were synthesised with respect to vulnerable populations and health equity, focusing on consumption, health outcomes, and economic effects. Findings indicate that minimum pricing reduces consumption among people who drink heavily and those in lower socio-economic groups, leading to disproportionate declines in alcohol-related mortality, hospitalisations, and conditions such as liver disease. The greatest health gains occurred among populations experiencing poverty, social marginalization, or alcohol use disorder, highlighting potential to promote health equity. People who drink at low volumes were minimally affected, and substitution effects - such as increased use of non-beverage alcohol or other drugs - were negligible. Purchasing patterns shifted from high-risk, low-cost alcohol products to lower-risk alternatives. Concerns about other unintended consequences, including displacement of essential spending or increased crime, are not strongly supported by current evidence, though isolated findings suggest individuals with severe alcohol use disorder may face challenges. Complementary measures, such as Managed Alcohol Programmes, could mitigate these effects. This review underscores the potential of MUP as a public health strategy that both reduces alcohol-related harm and advances health equity. Further research should examine long-term effects on vulnerable populations and broader outcomes, such as social mobility.
酒精最低定价政策,包括最低单位定价(MUP),是减少酒精消费和相关危害的有效策略。然而,它们对股票的影响仍未得到充分探讨。我们对PubMed和Web of Science进行了快速回顾,确定了37项评估酒精最低定价影响的现实研究。综合了来自不同背景的关于弱势群体和卫生公平的研究,重点是消费、健康结果和经济影响。研究结果表明,最低定价减少了重度饮酒者和社会经济地位较低人群的消费,导致与酒精有关的死亡率、住院率和肝病等疾病的不成比例地下降。最大的健康收益发生在经历贫困、社会边缘化或酒精使用障碍的人群中,这突出了促进卫生公平的潜力。少量饮酒的人受到的影响最小,替代效应——比如增加非饮料酒精或其他药物的使用——可以忽略不计。购买模式从高风险、低成本的酒精产品转向风险较低的替代品。对其他意想不到的后果的担忧,包括基本支出的转移或犯罪的增加,目前的证据并没有强有力的支持,尽管孤立的发现表明,严重酒精使用障碍的个人可能面临挑战。补充措施,如酒精管理规划,可以减轻这些影响。这篇综述强调了MUP作为一项既能减少酒精相关危害又能促进健康公平的公共卫生战略的潜力。进一步的研究应该检查对弱势群体的长期影响和更广泛的结果,如社会流动性。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.