{"title":"Measuring the Global Englishes mindset: Development and validation of the GEM-Q for EFL learners","authors":"Anuchaya Montakantiwong , Natsuno Funada","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite growing interest in Global Englishes (GE)-informed pedagogy, most existing studies fall short in capturing the nuanced and evolving attitudes of learners toward the pluralistic realities of English today. Current research instruments often lack the conceptual depth and methodological rigor needed to assess key constructs such as linguistic diversity, native-speakerism, and learner agency. Responding to recent calls for more robust tools to measure complex constructs like identity and attitude (Rose & McKinley, 2025), this study introduces and validates the Global Englishes Mindset Questionnaire (GEM-Q), a theoretically grounded, empirically tested instrument aligned with the Global Englishes Language Teaching (GELT) framework. Drawing on prior instruments and qualitative insights, the GEM-Q was refined through exploratory factor analysis (<em>N</em> = 418) and confirmatory factor analysis (<em>N</em> = 192) involving Thai EFL undergraduate students. The results confirmed a reliable four-factor structure: Multilingual utility value, Linguistic diversity orientation, Accent bias and Nativespeakerism, and Agency in English communication. These findings reveal the layered and sometimes conflicting attitudes learners hold toward Global Englishes. The paper concludes by highlighting the GEM-Q's potential for guiding future pedagogical interventions and cross-contextual attitude research in English language education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 103847"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X2500257X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite growing interest in Global Englishes (GE)-informed pedagogy, most existing studies fall short in capturing the nuanced and evolving attitudes of learners toward the pluralistic realities of English today. Current research instruments often lack the conceptual depth and methodological rigor needed to assess key constructs such as linguistic diversity, native-speakerism, and learner agency. Responding to recent calls for more robust tools to measure complex constructs like identity and attitude (Rose & McKinley, 2025), this study introduces and validates the Global Englishes Mindset Questionnaire (GEM-Q), a theoretically grounded, empirically tested instrument aligned with the Global Englishes Language Teaching (GELT) framework. Drawing on prior instruments and qualitative insights, the GEM-Q was refined through exploratory factor analysis (N = 418) and confirmatory factor analysis (N = 192) involving Thai EFL undergraduate students. The results confirmed a reliable four-factor structure: Multilingual utility value, Linguistic diversity orientation, Accent bias and Nativespeakerism, and Agency in English communication. These findings reveal the layered and sometimes conflicting attitudes learners hold toward Global Englishes. The paper concludes by highlighting the GEM-Q's potential for guiding future pedagogical interventions and cross-contextual attitude research in English language education.
期刊介绍:
This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.