Effects of temperature, compound concentration verification, and internal fluoride on hERG

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Aimee L. Bielinski, Mark T. Zafiratos, Andrew S. Zielonka, Ruth L. Martin
{"title":"Effects of temperature, compound concentration verification, and internal fluoride on hERG","authors":"Aimee L. Bielinski,&nbsp;Mark T. Zafiratos,&nbsp;Andrew S. Zielonka,&nbsp;Ruth L. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2025.107823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Are automated electrophysiology platform (EP) data appropriately rigorous to be included in regulatory filings? Automated EP platforms have been in use for more than 20 years yet are still primarily used for initial screening of compounds against hERG and other ion channels. In this study we investigated the effects of 20 known compounds with a wide range of potencies against hERG. We conducted all experiments using SyncroPatch 384i and cryo-preserved assay-ready hERG cells. We compare results for temperature effects (25 °C vs. 35 °C) and the presence of fluoride in the internal solution. Verification of well compound concentrations via LC-MS/MS analysis were determined for all variations of the experiment. We used a standard 2-step voltage protocol (Vh = −80 mV, Vs = +20 mV for 5 s, Vt = −50 mV for 5 s, repeated once every 15 s for &gt;5 min). At 25 °C, in the presence of internal fluoride, we saw a range of targeted IC<sub>50</sub>s from &lt;1 to &gt;30 μM. When we corrected the data after verification of compound well concentrations, the range of IC<sub>50</sub>s was now 0.1 μM to 38 μM. At 35 °C, in the presence of internal fluoride, the targeted range of IC<sub>50</sub>s was &lt;1 μM to &gt;30 μM and with correction for verification of concentrations was 0.2 μM to &gt;38 μM. We conclude that for this set of compounds, temperature (25 °C vs 35 °C) has no meaningful effect on IC<sub>50</sub>s nor on the verification of concentrations. We repeated this set of experiments, now in the absence of internal fluoride. Targeted IC<sub>50</sub>s were comparable to those determined in the presence of internal fluoride and verification of concentrations did not change that result. We conclude that for this set of compounds, the presence or absence of internal fluoride has no meaningful effect on IC<sub>50</sub>s nor on the verification of concentrations, although it has a very large effect on experimental success rate. We hope this study will further the conversation on steps needed to implement automated electrophysiology platforms as an accepted tool used in hERG investigations for regulatory filings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 107823"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871925002436","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Are automated electrophysiology platform (EP) data appropriately rigorous to be included in regulatory filings? Automated EP platforms have been in use for more than 20 years yet are still primarily used for initial screening of compounds against hERG and other ion channels. In this study we investigated the effects of 20 known compounds with a wide range of potencies against hERG. We conducted all experiments using SyncroPatch 384i and cryo-preserved assay-ready hERG cells. We compare results for temperature effects (25 °C vs. 35 °C) and the presence of fluoride in the internal solution. Verification of well compound concentrations via LC-MS/MS analysis were determined for all variations of the experiment. We used a standard 2-step voltage protocol (Vh = −80 mV, Vs = +20 mV for 5 s, Vt = −50 mV for 5 s, repeated once every 15 s for >5 min). At 25 °C, in the presence of internal fluoride, we saw a range of targeted IC50s from <1 to >30 μM. When we corrected the data after verification of compound well concentrations, the range of IC50s was now 0.1 μM to 38 μM. At 35 °C, in the presence of internal fluoride, the targeted range of IC50s was <1 μM to >30 μM and with correction for verification of concentrations was 0.2 μM to >38 μM. We conclude that for this set of compounds, temperature (25 °C vs 35 °C) has no meaningful effect on IC50s nor on the verification of concentrations. We repeated this set of experiments, now in the absence of internal fluoride. Targeted IC50s were comparable to those determined in the presence of internal fluoride and verification of concentrations did not change that result. We conclude that for this set of compounds, the presence or absence of internal fluoride has no meaningful effect on IC50s nor on the verification of concentrations, although it has a very large effect on experimental success rate. We hope this study will further the conversation on steps needed to implement automated electrophysiology platforms as an accepted tool used in hERG investigations for regulatory filings.
温度、化合物浓度验证和内氟对hERG的影响
自动电生理平台(EP)数据是否严格到可以纳入监管文件?自动化EP平台已经使用了20多年 ,但仍然主要用于抗hERG和其他离子通道的化合物的初步筛选。在这项研究中,我们研究了20种已知化合物对hERG的作用,这些化合物具有广泛的效力。我们使用SyncroPatch 384i和冷冻保存的hERG细胞进行所有实验。我们比较了温度效应的结果(25 °C vs. 35 °C)和内溶液中氟的存在。通过LC-MS/MS分析确定了所有实验变量的井化合物浓度验证。 我们使用一个标准的两步电压协议(Vh = −80 mV, Vs = + 20 mV 5 年代,Vt = −50 mV 5 年代,重复每隔15 年代祝辞 5分钟)。在25 °C下,在内部氟化物存在的情况下,我们看到目标ic50范围从<;1到>;30 μM。当我们在验证复合井浓度后对数据进行校正时,ic50的范围现在为0.1 μM至38 μM。在35 °C时,在内氟存在的情况下,ic50的目标范围为<;1 μM ~ >30 μM,校正浓度验证范围为0.2 μM ~ >38 μM。我们得出结论,对于这组化合物,温度(25 °C vs 35 °C)对ic50和浓度验证没有显著影响。 我们重复了这组实验,在没有氟化物的情况下。目标ic50与体内氟化物存在时确定的ic50相当,对浓度的验证并未改变这一结果。我们得出的结论是,对于这组化合物,内部氟化物的存在或不存在对ic50和浓度验证没有意义的影响,尽管它对实验成功率有很大的影响。 我们希望这项研究将进一步讨论实现自动化电生理平台作为hERG调查中用于监管备案的公认工具所需的步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信