Artificial neural network based automatic detection of motor evoked potentials

Bethel Osuagwu , Hongli Huang , Emily L. McNicol , Vellaisamy A.L. Roy , Aleksandra Vučkovič
{"title":"Artificial neural network based automatic detection of motor evoked potentials","authors":"Bethel Osuagwu ,&nbsp;Hongli Huang ,&nbsp;Emily L. McNicol ,&nbsp;Vellaisamy A.L. Roy ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Vučkovič","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Motor evoked potentials (MEP) are detected using various methods that determine signal changepoints. The current detection methods perform well given a high signal to noise ratio. However, performance can diminish with artefact such as those arising due to poor signal quality and unwanted electrical potentials. Part of the problem is likely because the methods ignore the morphology of a signal making it impossible to differentiate noise from MEPs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>For the first time, we investigated a new detection method able to learn MEP morphology using artificial neural networks. To build an MEP detection model, we trained deep neural networks with architectures based on combined CNN and LSTM or self-attention mechanism, using sample MEP data recorded from able-bodied individuals. The MEP detection capability of the models was compared with that of a changepoint based detection method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our models reached test accuracy of up to 89.7 ± 1.5 % on average. In a real-world setting evaluation, our models achieved average detection accuracy of up to 94.7 ± 1.2 %, compared with 76.4 ± 5.3 % for the standard changepoint detection method (p = 0.004).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Artificial neural network models can be used for improved automated detection of MEPs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73399,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence-based medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521225000997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Motor evoked potentials (MEP) are detected using various methods that determine signal changepoints. The current detection methods perform well given a high signal to noise ratio. However, performance can diminish with artefact such as those arising due to poor signal quality and unwanted electrical potentials. Part of the problem is likely because the methods ignore the morphology of a signal making it impossible to differentiate noise from MEPs.

Methods

For the first time, we investigated a new detection method able to learn MEP morphology using artificial neural networks. To build an MEP detection model, we trained deep neural networks with architectures based on combined CNN and LSTM or self-attention mechanism, using sample MEP data recorded from able-bodied individuals. The MEP detection capability of the models was compared with that of a changepoint based detection method.

Results

Our models reached test accuracy of up to 89.7 ± 1.5 % on average. In a real-world setting evaluation, our models achieved average detection accuracy of up to 94.7 ± 1.2 %, compared with 76.4 ± 5.3 % for the standard changepoint detection method (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

Artificial neural network models can be used for improved automated detection of MEPs.
基于人工神经网络的运动诱发电位自动检测
运动诱发电位(MEP)的检测使用各种方法来确定信号的变化点。当前的检测方法在高信噪比条件下表现良好。然而,由于信号质量差和不需要的电势而产生的伪影会降低性能。部分问题可能是因为这些方法忽略了信号的形态,从而无法区分噪声和mep。方法首次研究了一种基于人工神经网络的MEP形态学检测方法。为了构建MEP检测模型,我们使用健全个体的MEP样本数据,训练了基于CNN和LSTM(自注意机制)相结合的深层神经网络架构。将模型的MEP检测能力与基于变化点的检测方法进行了比较。结果模型的检测准确率平均可达89.7±1.5%。在现实环境评估中,我们的模型实现了高达94.7±1.2%的平均检测精度,而标准变化点检测方法的平均检测精度为76.4±5.3% (p = 0.004)。结论人工神经网络模型可用于改进mep的自动检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intelligence-based medicine
Intelligence-based medicine Health Informatics
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
187 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信