Amanda J. Moreno , Rebecca Hinze-Pifer , Stephen Baker , Reiko Kakuyama-Villaber , Adenia Linker
{"title":"Academic impacts of a mindfulness-based intervention on early grades students attending high-needs schools","authors":"Amanda J. Moreno , Rebecca Hinze-Pifer , Stephen Baker , Reiko Kakuyama-Villaber , Adenia Linker","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Academic impacts of school-based mindfulness programs (SBMPs) have been far less studied than social and emotional ones (Roeser et al., 2022), which is surprising considering the intuitive as well as documented ability of mindfulness exercises to train attentional mechanisms. The current study was set up to examine the impact of an SBMP on the executive function, verbal performance, and math performance of a sample of students (n’s = 1,116-1533) in the K-2 grades, relative to a more traditional, social scenarios-based social and emotional learning (SEL) program. 32 Chicago Public Schools were randomly assigned to either the treatment group, which employed the Calm Classroom K-2 program (CCK2; Luster Learning Institute), or the active control group, which employed the district’s default SEL program, Second Step (Committee for Children). The CCK2 group demonstrated advantages in verbal performance after one year of programming (impact estimate = .35 SD) and no other statistically significant program impacts, although any non-trivial differences also favored CCK2 (impact estimates = .05 - .21 SD). Treatment-control differences after two years were smaller, which was contrary to expectations. Exploratory moderation analyses did not reveal any specialized findings within subgroups (e.g., gender, race), or by implementation fidelity. Findings are discussed in terms of the conservative design, implementation challenges in a large-scale program within high-needs public schools, and the different potential mechanisms operating in these programs, making them more complementary than competitive, and suggesting merit in offering non-cognitive activities that employ both “internal” and “external” approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"74 ","pages":"Pages 106-116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625000924","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Academic impacts of school-based mindfulness programs (SBMPs) have been far less studied than social and emotional ones (Roeser et al., 2022), which is surprising considering the intuitive as well as documented ability of mindfulness exercises to train attentional mechanisms. The current study was set up to examine the impact of an SBMP on the executive function, verbal performance, and math performance of a sample of students (n’s = 1,116-1533) in the K-2 grades, relative to a more traditional, social scenarios-based social and emotional learning (SEL) program. 32 Chicago Public Schools were randomly assigned to either the treatment group, which employed the Calm Classroom K-2 program (CCK2; Luster Learning Institute), or the active control group, which employed the district’s default SEL program, Second Step (Committee for Children). The CCK2 group demonstrated advantages in verbal performance after one year of programming (impact estimate = .35 SD) and no other statistically significant program impacts, although any non-trivial differences also favored CCK2 (impact estimates = .05 - .21 SD). Treatment-control differences after two years were smaller, which was contrary to expectations. Exploratory moderation analyses did not reveal any specialized findings within subgroups (e.g., gender, race), or by implementation fidelity. Findings are discussed in terms of the conservative design, implementation challenges in a large-scale program within high-needs public schools, and the different potential mechanisms operating in these programs, making them more complementary than competitive, and suggesting merit in offering non-cognitive activities that employ both “internal” and “external” approaches.
期刊介绍:
For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.