Gastroparesis as a potential complication of pentaspline pulsed field ablation without endoscopic esophageal injury.

IF 2.6
Mourad Haj Abdo, Thomas Deneke, Karin Nentwich, Ivaylo Chakarov, Arthur Berkovitz, Elena Sauer, Martjin Rogiers, Christiane Neumann, Lisa Costello-Boerrigter, Sebastian Barth, Khalil Haj Abdo, Lepasova Mihajloska, Ralf Surber, Ulrich Lüsebrink, Anja Schade
{"title":"Gastroparesis as a potential complication of pentaspline pulsed field ablation without endoscopic esophageal injury.","authors":"Mourad Haj Abdo, Thomas Deneke, Karin Nentwich, Ivaylo Chakarov, Arthur Berkovitz, Elena Sauer, Martjin Rogiers, Christiane Neumann, Lisa Costello-Boerrigter, Sebastian Barth, Khalil Haj Abdo, Lepasova Mihajloska, Ralf Surber, Ulrich Lüsebrink, Anja Schade","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02130-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new nonthermal, ablation modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) that is cardiac tissue selective. Compelling acute and long-term success rates and good safety features have been reported using a pentaspline PFA catheter. Thus far, no atrio-esophageal fistula (AEF) related to PFA has been reported. However, this fatal complication is rare and endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) may serve as a more sensitive instrument to document esophageal safety. This study aimed to evaluate the esophageal safety of the Farapulse™ PFA system by systematically using upper endoscopy post-ablation in a large, single-center cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent PVI using the pentaspline PFA system. Additional left atrial posterior PFA application was used in some cases. All patients underwent esophageal endoscopy within 1 day post-ablation. Follow-up visits occurred 3 and 12 months post-procedure. The patients had 48 h-Holter monitoring performed before each visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consecutive, symptomatic AF patients (n = 228, 87.6% paroxysmal) were enrolled. The patients were relatively young (age 59.4 ± 11.7 years), 67.4% male, and had a normal mean left ventricular function of 60 ± 8%. Mean left atrial diameter was 41 ± 4 mm. All PVs were successfully isolated. The procedure time was 55 ± 11 min, fluoroscopy duration was 7 ± 3 min, and the median dose area product was 563 ± 410 cGy cm<sup>2</sup>. Major procedural complications were only two AV fistula, which did not require intervention. No stroke, pericardial tamponade, or phrenic nerve damage occurred. EDEL were not detected in any patient. Gastroparesis occurred in nine (4%) cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lack of EDEL post-PVI using the pentaspline PFA-catheter in this large AF cohort highlights the esophageal safety of this method. Gastroparesis was observed in a small minority, but relationship with PFA is still to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02130-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new nonthermal, ablation modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) that is cardiac tissue selective. Compelling acute and long-term success rates and good safety features have been reported using a pentaspline PFA catheter. Thus far, no atrio-esophageal fistula (AEF) related to PFA has been reported. However, this fatal complication is rare and endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) may serve as a more sensitive instrument to document esophageal safety. This study aimed to evaluate the esophageal safety of the Farapulse™ PFA system by systematically using upper endoscopy post-ablation in a large, single-center cohort.

Methods: Patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent PVI using the pentaspline PFA system. Additional left atrial posterior PFA application was used in some cases. All patients underwent esophageal endoscopy within 1 day post-ablation. Follow-up visits occurred 3 and 12 months post-procedure. The patients had 48 h-Holter monitoring performed before each visit.

Results: Consecutive, symptomatic AF patients (n = 228, 87.6% paroxysmal) were enrolled. The patients were relatively young (age 59.4 ± 11.7 years), 67.4% male, and had a normal mean left ventricular function of 60 ± 8%. Mean left atrial diameter was 41 ± 4 mm. All PVs were successfully isolated. The procedure time was 55 ± 11 min, fluoroscopy duration was 7 ± 3 min, and the median dose area product was 563 ± 410 cGy cm2. Major procedural complications were only two AV fistula, which did not require intervention. No stroke, pericardial tamponade, or phrenic nerve damage occurred. EDEL were not detected in any patient. Gastroparesis occurred in nine (4%) cases.

Conclusions: The lack of EDEL post-PVI using the pentaspline PFA-catheter in this large AF cohort highlights the esophageal safety of this method. Gastroparesis was observed in a small minority, but relationship with PFA is still to be determined.

胃轻瘫是无内镜下食管损伤的pentaspline脉冲场消融的潜在并发症。
背景:脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种用于肺静脉隔离(PVI)的新型非热消融方式,具有心脏组织选择性。使用pentaspline PFA导管具有令人信服的急性和长期成功率和良好的安全性。到目前为止,还没有与PFA相关的心房-食管瘘(AEF)的报道。然而,这种致命的并发症是罕见的,内镜下检测到的食管病变(EDEL)可以作为一个更敏感的工具来记录食管安全。本研究旨在通过在大型单中心队列中系统地使用消融后上腔镜来评估farappulse™PFA系统的食管安全性。方法:对症房颤(AF)患者采用pentaspline PFA系统进行PVI治疗。部分病例采用左心房后置PFA辅助治疗。所有患者均在消融后1天内行食管内镜检查。术后3个月和12个月进行随访。患者每次就诊前进行48小时动态心电图监测。结果:连续的有症状的房颤患者(n = 228, 87.6%为阵发性房颤)被纳入研究。患者年龄相对年轻(59.4±11.7岁),67.4%为男性,平均左心室功能正常(60±8%)。平均左心房内径41±4mm。所有pv均成功分离。手术时间55±11 min,透视时间7±3 min,中位剂量面积积563±410 cGy cm2。主要的手术并发症只有两个房室瘘,不需要干预。无脑卒中、心包填塞、膈神经损伤。所有患者均未检出EDEL。胃轻瘫9例(4%)。结论:在这个大型房颤队列中,使用pentaspline pfa -导管pvi后缺乏EDEL,这突出了该方法的食道安全性。胃轻瘫在少数人中被观察到,但与PFA的关系仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信