Examining the role of faecal microbiota transplantation for inducing remission in resistant ulcerative proctitis and distal ulcerative colitis (up-FMT).

IF 8.7
Sreecanth S Raja, Samuel P Costello, Chris K Rayner, Alice Day, Laura Portmann, Wendy Uylaki, Reuben Wheeler, Sarah Saxon, Emily C Tucker, James Fon, Suzanne Edwards, Remy B Young, Samuel C Forster, Thomas Goodsall, Robert V Bryant
{"title":"Examining the role of faecal microbiota transplantation for inducing remission in resistant ulcerative proctitis and distal ulcerative colitis (up-FMT).","authors":"Sreecanth S Raja, Samuel P Costello, Chris K Rayner, Alice Day, Laura Portmann, Wendy Uylaki, Reuben Wheeler, Sarah Saxon, Emily C Tucker, James Fon, Suzanne Edwards, Remy B Young, Samuel C Forster, Thomas Goodsall, Robert V Bryant","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resistant ulcerative proctitis (UP) represents a clinical conundrum, often necessitating the use of systemic therapy despite the disease being localised. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has proven efficacy for inducing remission in ulcerative colitis (UC) but has not been evaluated in UP.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To undertake a pilot study examining the safety and efficacy of FMT enema therapy for management of resistant UP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with mild-moderate active UP (total Mayo 3-10 with endoscopic Mayo subscore ≥ 1) were enrolled. After an initial conditioning phase of vancomycin and dietary education, participants received six anaerobically prepared single-donor FMT retention enemas over 8 weeks. The primary end point was safety and tolerability of FMT therapy. Secondary endpoints included combined clinical and endoscopic remission (Mayo Clinic score ≤2 with endoscopic subscore ≤1), histological remission, patient reported outcomes and exploratory microbial analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30 participants were enrolled (median age 41 years; 17 [57%] female). Serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients, including flare of UC (n = 2) and Clostridioides difficile colitis (n = 1). 18 patients (60%) reported mild-moderate adverse events, most commonly gastrointestinal symptoms. Combined clinical and endoscopic remission was achieved in 10 patients (33.3%). Higher baseline Mayo score (OR 0.28, p = 0.008) and faecal calprotectin (OR 0.66, p = 0.049) predicted failure to achieve remission. Participants demonstrated a decrease in Shannon diversity (p = 0.02) following the dual intervention of vancomycin conditioning and FMT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antibiotic conditioning followed by FMT enema therapy was well tolerated and demonstrated efficacy in inducing clinical remission in UP. Further controlled studies of FMT in UP are warranted alongside mechanistic assessment of both faecal and mucosa-associated microbiome.</p>","PeriodicalId":94074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Resistant ulcerative proctitis (UP) represents a clinical conundrum, often necessitating the use of systemic therapy despite the disease being localised. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has proven efficacy for inducing remission in ulcerative colitis (UC) but has not been evaluated in UP.

Aims: To undertake a pilot study examining the safety and efficacy of FMT enema therapy for management of resistant UP.

Methods: Patients with mild-moderate active UP (total Mayo 3-10 with endoscopic Mayo subscore ≥ 1) were enrolled. After an initial conditioning phase of vancomycin and dietary education, participants received six anaerobically prepared single-donor FMT retention enemas over 8 weeks. The primary end point was safety and tolerability of FMT therapy. Secondary endpoints included combined clinical and endoscopic remission (Mayo Clinic score ≤2 with endoscopic subscore ≤1), histological remission, patient reported outcomes and exploratory microbial analysis.

Results: 30 participants were enrolled (median age 41 years; 17 [57%] female). Serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients, including flare of UC (n = 2) and Clostridioides difficile colitis (n = 1). 18 patients (60%) reported mild-moderate adverse events, most commonly gastrointestinal symptoms. Combined clinical and endoscopic remission was achieved in 10 patients (33.3%). Higher baseline Mayo score (OR 0.28, p = 0.008) and faecal calprotectin (OR 0.66, p = 0.049) predicted failure to achieve remission. Participants demonstrated a decrease in Shannon diversity (p = 0.02) following the dual intervention of vancomycin conditioning and FMT.

Conclusions: Antibiotic conditioning followed by FMT enema therapy was well tolerated and demonstrated efficacy in inducing clinical remission in UP. Further controlled studies of FMT in UP are warranted alongside mechanistic assessment of both faecal and mucosa-associated microbiome.

检查粪便微生物群移植在诱导耐药性溃疡性直肠炎和远端溃疡性结肠炎缓解中的作用。
背景:抵抗性溃疡性直肠炎(UP)是一个临床难题,尽管疾病是局部的,但通常需要使用全身治疗。粪便微生物群移植(FMT)已被证明对溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的缓解有效,但尚未对UP进行评估。目的:开展一项初步研究,检查FMT灌肠治疗耐药UP的安全性和有效性。方法:纳入轻中度活动性UP患者(Mayo总分3-10,内窥镜Mayo评分≥1)。在万古霉素的初始调理阶段和饮食教育之后,参与者接受了6次厌氧制备的单供体FMT保留灌肠,持续8周。主要终点是FMT治疗的安全性和耐受性。次要终点包括临床和内镜联合缓解(梅奥临床评分≤2,内镜评分≤1)、组织学缓解、患者报告的结果和探索性微生物分析。结果:30名参与者入组(中位年龄41岁;17名(57%)女性)。3例患者发生严重不良事件,包括UC发作(n = 2)和艰难梭菌性结肠炎(n = 1)。18名患者(60%)报告了轻中度不良事件,最常见的是胃肠道症状。10例患者(33.3%)达到临床和内镜联合缓解。较高的基线Mayo评分(OR 0.28, p = 0.008)和粪便钙保护蛋白(OR 0.66, p = 0.049)预示无法达到缓解。在万古霉素调节和FMT的双重干预下,参与者表现出Shannon多样性的下降(p = 0.02)。结论:抗生素调理后FMT灌肠治疗耐受性良好,可诱导UP临床缓解。在粪便和粘膜相关微生物组的机制评估的同时,需要对UP中的FMT进行进一步的对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信