Luca Nardelli, Antonio Scalamogna, Federica Tripodi, Carlo Alfieri, Giuseppe Castellano
{"title":"Simultaneous removal and replacement of the peritoneal catheter in PD patients with partial refractory peritonitis.","authors":"Luca Nardelli, Antonio Scalamogna, Federica Tripodi, Carlo Alfieri, Giuseppe Castellano","doi":"10.1177/11297298251372318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) peritonitis continues to be the main cause of PD-related death, and the leading reason of transfer to hemodialysis (HD). International guidelines recommend that peritoneal catheter should be removed if PD effluent does not clear after 5 days of adequate antibiotics defining the case as refractory peritonitis. The simultaneous removal and replacement of the peritoneal catheter (SCR) has been used as treatment for recurrent or catheter-related peritonitis after the utter healing of the acute infection to spare patient the interruption of PD and the transfer to HD. On the other hand, in case of refractory episodes the employment of SCR is discouraged. However, the clinical trend of refractory peritonitis is not homogenous: some episodes are totally unresponsive to medical therapy, while others show to be partially responsive. Thus, the treatment should be diversified according to the different clinical evolution. We report two cases of refractory peritonitis sustained by P. aeruginosa that were successfully treated by SCR after a partial response to antibiotic therapy. Along with these preliminary data, we propose a novel therapeutical algorithm differentiating between complete refractory peritonitis and partial refractory peritonitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251372318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251372318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) peritonitis continues to be the main cause of PD-related death, and the leading reason of transfer to hemodialysis (HD). International guidelines recommend that peritoneal catheter should be removed if PD effluent does not clear after 5 days of adequate antibiotics defining the case as refractory peritonitis. The simultaneous removal and replacement of the peritoneal catheter (SCR) has been used as treatment for recurrent or catheter-related peritonitis after the utter healing of the acute infection to spare patient the interruption of PD and the transfer to HD. On the other hand, in case of refractory episodes the employment of SCR is discouraged. However, the clinical trend of refractory peritonitis is not homogenous: some episodes are totally unresponsive to medical therapy, while others show to be partially responsive. Thus, the treatment should be diversified according to the different clinical evolution. We report two cases of refractory peritonitis sustained by P. aeruginosa that were successfully treated by SCR after a partial response to antibiotic therapy. Along with these preliminary data, we propose a novel therapeutical algorithm differentiating between complete refractory peritonitis and partial refractory peritonitis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques.
All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process.
The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level:
• Dialysis
• Oncology
• Interventional radiology
• Nutrition
• Nursing
• Intensive care
Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.