Manipulation under anesthesia for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: A French multicenter study with 5 years' follow-up including 344 cases.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Claude-Alain Roullet, Stéphane Descamps, Shirin Monadjemi, Aymard De Ladoucette, Cecile Batailler, Bruno Miletic, Matthieu Ehlinger
{"title":"Manipulation under anesthesia for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: A French multicenter study with 5 years' follow-up including 344 cases.","authors":"Claude-Alain Roullet, Stéphane Descamps, Shirin Monadjemi, Aymard De Ladoucette, Cecile Batailler, Bruno Miletic, Matthieu Ehlinger","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>knee stiffness is a common complication following total knee replacement (TKA), causing important morbidity. Although manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is a safe method for the treatment of stiffness, its benefits over long-term and for large cohorts are not precisely known. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess clinical and functional outcomes and patients satisfaction after MUA over 5 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Our hypothesis was that range of motion (ROM) improvement would be superior to 30° and would be sustained at 5 years follow-up leading to a patient satisfaction rate exceeding 70%.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was an observational retrospective study organized with 14 French centers implied in the SOFCOT. Three hundred and forty four patients who underwent MUA following TKA were reviewed between January 2023 and June 2024. Among the cohort, patients who underwent a second MUA were analyzed separately. The collected data included patient demographics, Devane activity, ASA score, functional scores, knee amplitudes and satisfaction rates. Statistical analysis was performed with EasyMedStat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean time between TKA and MUA was 2.9 ± 6.9 months and the mean follow-up was 5.5 ± 2.5 years. In comparison with the ROM at stiffness diagnosis (66.6°± 21.0°), at 5 years post-MUA, the ROM was improved by 36.0° ± 26.1 (p < 0.001), at a mean of 102.2° ± 22.6°. The subgroup of patients having a second MUA had a ROM gain of 16.8° ± 12.3° at 5-years post-MUA. The global complication rate after MUA was 2.3% (n = 8) including hematoma, wound dehiscence, infection, tibial tubercle fracture and patellar tendon rupture. At last follow-up, OKS was 35.4 ± 9.6. The KOOS for all subscales ranged from 38.5 ± 30.9 to 57.5 ± 33.8 and the mean FJS was 35.0 ± 14.3. A high satisfaction rate was recorded (77.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The improvement in ROM was substantial throughout the 5-year follow-up period. MUA was associated with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction, suggesting that it is an effective treatment for knee stiffness.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III; multicenter retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104432","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: knee stiffness is a common complication following total knee replacement (TKA), causing important morbidity. Although manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is a safe method for the treatment of stiffness, its benefits over long-term and for large cohorts are not precisely known. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess clinical and functional outcomes and patients satisfaction after MUA over 5 years of follow-up.

Hypothesis: Our hypothesis was that range of motion (ROM) improvement would be superior to 30° and would be sustained at 5 years follow-up leading to a patient satisfaction rate exceeding 70%.

Material and methods: This was an observational retrospective study organized with 14 French centers implied in the SOFCOT. Three hundred and forty four patients who underwent MUA following TKA were reviewed between January 2023 and June 2024. Among the cohort, patients who underwent a second MUA were analyzed separately. The collected data included patient demographics, Devane activity, ASA score, functional scores, knee amplitudes and satisfaction rates. Statistical analysis was performed with EasyMedStat.

Results: The mean time between TKA and MUA was 2.9 ± 6.9 months and the mean follow-up was 5.5 ± 2.5 years. In comparison with the ROM at stiffness diagnosis (66.6°± 21.0°), at 5 years post-MUA, the ROM was improved by 36.0° ± 26.1 (p < 0.001), at a mean of 102.2° ± 22.6°. The subgroup of patients having a second MUA had a ROM gain of 16.8° ± 12.3° at 5-years post-MUA. The global complication rate after MUA was 2.3% (n = 8) including hematoma, wound dehiscence, infection, tibial tubercle fracture and patellar tendon rupture. At last follow-up, OKS was 35.4 ± 9.6. The KOOS for all subscales ranged from 38.5 ± 30.9 to 57.5 ± 33.8 and the mean FJS was 35.0 ± 14.3. A high satisfaction rate was recorded (77.5%).

Conclusion: The improvement in ROM was substantial throughout the 5-year follow-up period. MUA was associated with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction, suggesting that it is an effective treatment for knee stiffness.

Level of evidence: III; multicenter retrospective cohort study.

麻醉下操作治疗全膝关节置换术后僵硬:一项法国多中心研究,随访5年,包括344例。
膝关节僵硬是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后常见的并发症,引起重要的发病率。尽管麻醉下操作(MUA)是治疗僵硬的一种安全方法,但其长期和大规模队列的益处尚不清楚。这项回顾性研究的目的是评估MUA术后5年的临床和功能结果以及患者满意度。假设:我们的假设是,活动范围(ROM)的改善将优于30°,并将持续5年的随访,导致患者满意度超过70%。材料和方法:这是一项在SOFCOT中包含的14个法国中心组织的观察性回顾性研究。在2023年1月至2024年6月期间,对344例TKA术后MUA患者进行了回顾。在队列中,接受第二次MUA的患者被单独分析。收集的数据包括患者人口统计、Devane活动、ASA评分、功能评分、膝关节振幅和满意度。使用EasyMedStat进行统计分析。结果:TKA与MUA的平均间隔时间为2.9±6.9个月,平均随访时间为5.5±2.5年。与僵硬诊断时的ROM(66.6°±21.0°)相比,在mua后5年,ROM改善了36.0°±26.1 (p)结论:在5年随访期间,ROM的改善是实质性的。MUA并发症发生率低,患者满意度高,提示它是治疗膝关节僵硬的有效方法。证据等级:III;多中心回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信