Postoperative follow-up by automated text messaging versus telephone call in outpatient care with continuous regional analgesia: a randomized controlled feasibility trial.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Erick Strange, Fernando R Altermatt, Luis Cáceres, Christopher Morrison, Luis Cortés, Nicolás Sumonte, Andrés Neyem
{"title":"Postoperative follow-up by automated text messaging versus telephone call in outpatient care with continuous regional analgesia: a randomized controlled feasibility trial.","authors":"Erick Strange, Fernando R Altermatt, Luis Cáceres, Christopher Morrison, Luis Cortés, Nicolás Sumonte, Andrés Neyem","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with continuous nerve blocks need structured follow-up, but daily phone calls are resource-intensive. Automated text messaging may offer a scalable alternative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized feasibility trial, 100 outpatients with continuous peripheral nerve catheters were assigned to either automated WhatsApp-based follow-up (mobile app group) or daily telephone calls (phone group) for 3 days. The primary outcome was usability, measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS, 0-100 scale; scores ≥68 indicate acceptable usability, ≥85 excellent usability). Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, response rates, reconsultations, and catheter-related events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 100 randomized patients, 91 were analyzed (46 mobile app group; 45 phone call group). The mobile app achieved a mean SUS score of 87.8, reflecting excellent usability. Satisfaction and response rates were high and similar between groups. Reconsultations were more frequent with the app (28.3% vs 6.7%), mainly non-urgent patient calls. Reports of minor catheter-related events were also more common in the app group (60.9% vs 37.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated messaging is feasible, demonstrates excellent usability, and preserves patient satisfaction. The higher rates of minor symptom reporting and reconsultations highlight areas for refinement in future research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06313294.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106818","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with continuous nerve blocks need structured follow-up, but daily phone calls are resource-intensive. Automated text messaging may offer a scalable alternative.

Methods: In this randomized feasibility trial, 100 outpatients with continuous peripheral nerve catheters were assigned to either automated WhatsApp-based follow-up (mobile app group) or daily telephone calls (phone group) for 3 days. The primary outcome was usability, measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS, 0-100 scale; scores ≥68 indicate acceptable usability, ≥85 excellent usability). Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, response rates, reconsultations, and catheter-related events.

Results: Out of 100 randomized patients, 91 were analyzed (46 mobile app group; 45 phone call group). The mobile app achieved a mean SUS score of 87.8, reflecting excellent usability. Satisfaction and response rates were high and similar between groups. Reconsultations were more frequent with the app (28.3% vs 6.7%), mainly non-urgent patient calls. Reports of minor catheter-related events were also more common in the app group (60.9% vs 37.8%).

Conclusions: Automated messaging is feasible, demonstrates excellent usability, and preserves patient satisfaction. The higher rates of minor symptom reporting and reconsultations highlight areas for refinement in future research.

Trial registration number: NCT06313294.

门诊病人持续局部镇痛术后自动短信随访与电话随访:一项随机对照可行性试验。
背景:持续性神经阻滞患者需要有组织的随访,但每天打电话是资源密集型的。自动短信可能会提供一个可扩展的替代方案。方法:在本随机可行性试验中,100例连续外周神经导管门诊患者分为基于whatsapp的自动随访组(移动应用组)和每日电话随访组(电话组),为期3天。主要结果是可用性,通过系统可用性量表(SUS, 0-100量表;得分≥68表示可接受的可用性,≥85表示优秀的可用性)来测量。次要结局包括满意度、反应率、复诊和导管相关事件。结果:在100例随机患者中,分析91例(移动应用组46例;电话通话组45例)。这款手机应用的平均SUS得分为87.8分,反映了出色的可用性。两组之间的满意度和反应率都很高且相似。再次咨询的频率更高(28.3%对6.7%),主要是非紧急患者呼叫。在app组中,轻微导管相关事件的报告也更为常见(60.9%对37.8%)。结论:自动信息传递是可行的,显示了良好的可用性,并保持了患者的满意度。较高的轻微症状报告率和复诊率突出了未来研究中需要改进的领域。试验注册号:NCT06313294。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信