Comparative Efficacy of ChatGPT and Gemini in Addressing Patient Queries on Gonarthrosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Serhat Gurbuz, Bulent Karslioglu, Ahmet Keskin, Niyazi Igde, Mustafa Bugra Ayaz, Yunus Imren
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of ChatGPT and Gemini in Addressing Patient Queries on Gonarthrosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Serhat Gurbuz, Bulent Karslioglu, Ahmet Keskin, Niyazi Igde, Mustafa Bugra Ayaz, Yunus Imren","doi":"10.1055/a-2693-0756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care has created novel opportunities for enhancing patient education and alleviating anxiety. This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of two leading AI platforms, ChatGPT and Gemini, in delivering accurate and satisfactory responses to patients with gonarthrosis, considering total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 100 patients diagnosed with gonarthrosis and indicated for TKA. Each patient posed five questions regarding the surgery and postoperative rehabilitation to both ChatGPT and Gemini. Responses were evaluated by two blinded orthopaedic specialists on a 10-point scale for accuracy and patient satisfaction. Patients additionally evaluated their satisfaction with each response using a 10-point scale. The main outcome measures consisted of the average accuracy scores assessed by specialists and the average satisfaction scores reported by patients. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between ChatGPT and Gemini in both accuracy and patient satisfaction (<i>p</i> < 0.001). ChatGPT demonstrated better performance with a mean accuracy score of 8.7 ± 0.9 compared with Gemini's 7.2 ± 1.1. Patient satisfaction scores aligned with expert evaluations, with ChatGPT achieving a mean satisfaction score of 8.9 ± 0.8 versus Gemini's 7.5 ± 1.2. Notably, ChatGPT excelled in providing comprehensive explanations of surgical procedures (mean score: 9.2 ± 0.7) and postoperative care (9.1 ± 0.8), whereas Gemini performed better in offering concise summaries of recovery timelines (8.4 ± 0.9). This study demonstrates that ChatGPT offers more accurate and satisfactory responses to patient queries regarding gonarthrosis and TKA compared with Gemini. The findings suggest that AI platforms, particularly ChatGPT, can serve as valuable tools in augmenting patient education and potentially reducing preoperative anxiety. Future studies should investigate the incorporation of AI-assisted information delivery into clinical practice and its long-term effects on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2693-0756","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care has created novel opportunities for enhancing patient education and alleviating anxiety. This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of two leading AI platforms, ChatGPT and Gemini, in delivering accurate and satisfactory responses to patients with gonarthrosis, considering total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 100 patients diagnosed with gonarthrosis and indicated for TKA. Each patient posed five questions regarding the surgery and postoperative rehabilitation to both ChatGPT and Gemini. Responses were evaluated by two blinded orthopaedic specialists on a 10-point scale for accuracy and patient satisfaction. Patients additionally evaluated their satisfaction with each response using a 10-point scale. The main outcome measures consisted of the average accuracy scores assessed by specialists and the average satisfaction scores reported by patients. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between ChatGPT and Gemini in both accuracy and patient satisfaction (p < 0.001). ChatGPT demonstrated better performance with a mean accuracy score of 8.7 ± 0.9 compared with Gemini's 7.2 ± 1.1. Patient satisfaction scores aligned with expert evaluations, with ChatGPT achieving a mean satisfaction score of 8.9 ± 0.8 versus Gemini's 7.5 ± 1.2. Notably, ChatGPT excelled in providing comprehensive explanations of surgical procedures (mean score: 9.2 ± 0.7) and postoperative care (9.1 ± 0.8), whereas Gemini performed better in offering concise summaries of recovery timelines (8.4 ± 0.9). This study demonstrates that ChatGPT offers more accurate and satisfactory responses to patient queries regarding gonarthrosis and TKA compared with Gemini. The findings suggest that AI platforms, particularly ChatGPT, can serve as valuable tools in augmenting patient education and potentially reducing preoperative anxiety. Future studies should investigate the incorporation of AI-assisted information delivery into clinical practice and its long-term effects on patient outcomes.

ChatGPT和Gemini在解决膝关节病和全膝关节置换术患者询问方面的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验。
人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域的出现为加强患者教育和减轻焦虑创造了新的机会。本研究旨在评估两种领先的人工智能平台ChatGPT和Gemini在为考虑全膝关节置换术(TKA)的关节病患者提供准确和满意的反应方面的有效性。一项前瞻性,随机对照试验进行了100名患者诊断为关节病和TKA适应症。每位患者向ChatGPT和Gemini提出5个关于手术和术后康复的问题。回复由两名盲法骨科专家以10分制的准确性和患者满意度进行评估。此外,患者还使用10分制评估他们对每个反应的满意度。主要结果测量包括专家评估的平均准确性得分和患者报告的平均满意度得分。统计分析显示,ChatGPT和Gemini在准确性和患者满意度方面存在显著差异(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信