The Person-Centred Care Practices of Mental Health Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Chantille Isler, Joy Maddigan, Donna Moralejo, Alice Gaudine, Robin Burry, Ahmad Deep, Hensley Mariathas
{"title":"The Person-Centred Care Practices of Mental Health Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Chantille Isler, Joy Maddigan, Donna Moralejo, Alice Gaudine, Robin Burry, Ahmad Deep, Hensley Mariathas","doi":"10.1111/jpm.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Person-centred care can result in improved patient satisfaction and health outcomes; however, operationalisation has been challenging in mental health settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe person-centred mental health nursing practices and associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was underpinned by The Person-Centred Practice Framework. All mental health and addictions registered nurses in one Canadian province were invited to complete the Person-centred Practice Inventory-Staff (PCPI-S) and a short demographic questionnaire. EQUATOR network recommendations for quantitative (STROBE) data were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nurses scored all three domains of the PCPI-S favourably, indicating strong evidence for person-centred practices; the practice environment domain was rated the lowest. There was a moderate, positive, statistically significant (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.451, p < 0.001) association between the practice environment domain score and the person-centred process domain score, which was the measure of delivery of person-centred care. A regression model explained 76.1% of the variance in delivery of person-centred care. Significant predictors were: (1) the prerequisites domain score of the PCPI-S, (2) the environment domain score of the PCPI-S and (3) nurses' relationship with their manager.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings from our study provide strong support for the use of the Person-centred Practice Framework in mental health nursing, particularly in the context of Canadian mental health and addictions services. Study results align with existing evidence that also reported generally favourable PCPI-S scores with comparatively lower scores in the practice environment domain.</p><p><strong>Recommendations: </strong>To address practice environment concerns, future research should focus on the context within which care takes place and its impact on the delivery of person-centred care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Person-centred care can result in improved patient satisfaction and health outcomes; however, operationalisation has been challenging in mental health settings.

Aim: To describe person-centred mental health nursing practices and associated factors.

Methods: The study was underpinned by The Person-Centred Practice Framework. All mental health and addictions registered nurses in one Canadian province were invited to complete the Person-centred Practice Inventory-Staff (PCPI-S) and a short demographic questionnaire. EQUATOR network recommendations for quantitative (STROBE) data were followed.

Results: Nurses scored all three domains of the PCPI-S favourably, indicating strong evidence for person-centred practices; the practice environment domain was rated the lowest. There was a moderate, positive, statistically significant (rs = 0.451, p < 0.001) association between the practice environment domain score and the person-centred process domain score, which was the measure of delivery of person-centred care. A regression model explained 76.1% of the variance in delivery of person-centred care. Significant predictors were: (1) the prerequisites domain score of the PCPI-S, (2) the environment domain score of the PCPI-S and (3) nurses' relationship with their manager.

Discussion: Findings from our study provide strong support for the use of the Person-centred Practice Framework in mental health nursing, particularly in the context of Canadian mental health and addictions services. Study results align with existing evidence that also reported generally favourable PCPI-S scores with comparatively lower scores in the practice environment domain.

Recommendations: To address practice environment concerns, future research should focus on the context within which care takes place and its impact on the delivery of person-centred care.

心理健康护士以人为本的护理实践:一项横断面研究
导言:以人为本的护理可以提高患者满意度和健康结果;然而,在精神卫生环境中,操作一直具有挑战性。目的:描述以人为本的心理健康护理实践及其相关因素。方法:本研究以“以人为本的实践框架”为基础。邀请加拿大一个省的所有心理健康和成瘾注册护士完成以人为中心的工作人员实践清单(PCPI-S)和一份简短的人口调查问卷。遵循赤道网络关于定量(STROBE)数据的建议。结果:护士在PCPI-S的所有三个领域都获得了好评,这表明以人为本的做法有强有力的证据;实践环境领域被评为最低。讨论:我们的研究结果为在心理健康护理中使用以人为本的实践框架提供了强有力的支持,特别是在加拿大心理健康和成瘾服务的背景下。研究结果与现有证据一致,也报告了总体有利的PCPI-S分数,而在实践环境领域的分数相对较低。建议:为了解决实践环境问题,未来的研究应该集中在护理发生的背景及其对以人为本的护理的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing is an international journal which publishes research and scholarly papers that advance the development of policy, practice, research and education in all aspects of mental health nursing. We publish rigorously conducted research, literature reviews, essays and debates, and consumer practitioner narratives; all of which add new knowledge and advance practice globally. All papers must have clear implications for mental health nursing either solely or part of multidisciplinary practice. Papers are welcomed which draw on single or multiple research and academic disciplines. We give space to practitioner and consumer perspectives and ensure research published in the journal can be understood by a wide audience. We encourage critical debate and exchange of ideas and therefore welcome letters to the editor and essays and debates in mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信