"Are You on the Phone Track, Are You on the Video Track, Are You on the In-Person Track?": Outpatient Healthcare Social Workers' Experiences with Telehealth.

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Margaret A Cristofalo
{"title":"\"Are You on the Phone Track, Are You on the Video Track, Are You on the In-Person Track?\": Outpatient Healthcare Social Workers' Experiences with Telehealth.","authors":"Margaret A Cristofalo","doi":"10.1093/hsw/hlaf035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since its rapid scale-up at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has become an established and pervasive modality of engagement in outpatient healthcare. There is minimal literature on its use by healthcare social workers, who expand across myriad roles and types of practice. The purpose of this article is to explore outpatient healthcare social workers' experiences with telehealth and their perceptions about its effect on their patients, particularly safety net populations. Semistructured interviews addressing effects of telehealth utilization on social workers, their practice, and their patients were completed with outpatient healthcare social workers (N = 21) from two urban medical centers. Three overarching themes emerged from thematic analysis: (1) telehealth facilitators and challenges to access; (2) telehealth's positive and negative effects on engagement, assessment, and intervention; and (3) telehealth work satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Results illustrate the need for increasing discernment for the benefit of patients to delineate paths of engagement through video, phone, hybrid, or in-person modalities by assessing the types of contextual factors identified by study participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":47424,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Work","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlaf035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its rapid scale-up at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has become an established and pervasive modality of engagement in outpatient healthcare. There is minimal literature on its use by healthcare social workers, who expand across myriad roles and types of practice. The purpose of this article is to explore outpatient healthcare social workers' experiences with telehealth and their perceptions about its effect on their patients, particularly safety net populations. Semistructured interviews addressing effects of telehealth utilization on social workers, their practice, and their patients were completed with outpatient healthcare social workers (N = 21) from two urban medical centers. Three overarching themes emerged from thematic analysis: (1) telehealth facilitators and challenges to access; (2) telehealth's positive and negative effects on engagement, assessment, and intervention; and (3) telehealth work satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Results illustrate the need for increasing discernment for the benefit of patients to delineate paths of engagement through video, phone, hybrid, or in-person modalities by assessing the types of contextual factors identified by study participants.

“你喜欢电话吗?你喜欢视频吗?你喜欢面对面吗?”门诊保健社会工作者远程医疗的经验。
自2019冠状病毒病大流行之初迅速扩大规模以来,远程医疗已成为门诊医疗的一种既定和普遍的参与方式。关于医疗保健社会工作者使用它的文献很少,他们扩展了无数的角色和类型的实践。本文的目的是探讨门诊保健社会工作者在远程医疗方面的经验,以及他们对远程医疗对患者,特别是安全网人群的影响的看法。来自两个城市医疗中心的门诊卫生保健社会工作者(N = 21)完成了关于远程医疗利用对社会工作者、他们的实践和患者的影响的半结构化访谈。专题分析产生了三个总体主题:(1)远程保健促进者和获取服务的挑战;(2)远程医疗对参与、评估和干预的积极和消极影响;(3)远程医疗工作满意度与不满意度。结果表明,通过评估研究参与者确定的背景因素类型,需要提高识别能力,以通过视频、电话、混合或面对面的方式描绘参与路径,从而使患者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health & Social Work
Health & Social Work SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信