An Equity-Focused Systematic Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance National Action Plans in 14 West African Countries.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Isaac Olushola Ogunkola, Adeola Bamisaiye, Aminat Olaitan Adebayo, Noah Sesay, Kwasi Yelarge, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno
{"title":"An Equity-Focused Systematic Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance National Action Plans in 14 West African Countries.","authors":"Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Isaac Olushola Ogunkola, Adeola Bamisaiye, Aminat Olaitan Adebayo, Noah Sesay, Kwasi Yelarge, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno","doi":"10.1111/tmi.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance is a growing global health threat that disproportionately affects socially and economically disadvantaged populations. National Action Plans are critical for coordinating national responses, but the extent to which they address equity remains unclear. This study assessed how antimicrobial resistance National Action Plans from 14 West African countries incorporate equity considerations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed antimicrobial resistance National Action Plans from 14 West African countries using a four-domain equity framework: (1) recognition of equity, (2) identification of vulnerable populations, (3) inclusion of equity-oriented interventions and (4) integration of equity into governance and monitoring. We assessed whether National Action Plans acknowledged 16 high-risk groups, including people living with HIV, displaced or mobile populations, children and adolescents, older adults, people with mental health disorders, rural residents, people with chronic illnesses, people living with disabilities, pregnant women, low-income populations, healthcare workers, people with substance use disorders, incarcerated populations, indigenous or minority groups, homeless populations and migrants or seasonal workers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All National Action Plans adopted a One Health approach, but equity was inconsistently addressed. Most did not explicitly reference equity, and none included equity-related indicators in monitoring frameworks. Healthcare workers and rural populations were the most frequently mentioned groups. Common interventions included hygiene promotion, public awareness campaigns and training of healthcare workers, but these were largely generic and rarely adapted to the specific needs of marginalised populations. Stakeholder engagement was often multisectoral but seldom ensured the participation of disadvantaged groups. Across the region, the lack of disaggregated data and tailored strategies highlights a significant equity gap.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Equity remains insufficiently integrated into antimicrobial resistance governance in West Africa. Future National Action Plans must explicitly identify at-risk populations, include equity indicators and involve affected communities in planning and oversight. Embedding equity is essential to building resilient and people-centred antimicrobial resistance strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23962,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.70037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance is a growing global health threat that disproportionately affects socially and economically disadvantaged populations. National Action Plans are critical for coordinating national responses, but the extent to which they address equity remains unclear. This study assessed how antimicrobial resistance National Action Plans from 14 West African countries incorporate equity considerations.

Methods: We reviewed antimicrobial resistance National Action Plans from 14 West African countries using a four-domain equity framework: (1) recognition of equity, (2) identification of vulnerable populations, (3) inclusion of equity-oriented interventions and (4) integration of equity into governance and monitoring. We assessed whether National Action Plans acknowledged 16 high-risk groups, including people living with HIV, displaced or mobile populations, children and adolescents, older adults, people with mental health disorders, rural residents, people with chronic illnesses, people living with disabilities, pregnant women, low-income populations, healthcare workers, people with substance use disorders, incarcerated populations, indigenous or minority groups, homeless populations and migrants or seasonal workers.

Results: All National Action Plans adopted a One Health approach, but equity was inconsistently addressed. Most did not explicitly reference equity, and none included equity-related indicators in monitoring frameworks. Healthcare workers and rural populations were the most frequently mentioned groups. Common interventions included hygiene promotion, public awareness campaigns and training of healthcare workers, but these were largely generic and rarely adapted to the specific needs of marginalised populations. Stakeholder engagement was often multisectoral but seldom ensured the participation of disadvantaged groups. Across the region, the lack of disaggregated data and tailored strategies highlights a significant equity gap.

Conclusion: Equity remains insufficiently integrated into antimicrobial resistance governance in West Africa. Future National Action Plans must explicitly identify at-risk populations, include equity indicators and involve affected communities in planning and oversight. Embedding equity is essential to building resilient and people-centred antimicrobial resistance strategies.

14个西非国家抗菌素耐药性国家行动计划的公平系统分析。
目标:抗微生物药物耐药性是一个日益严重的全球健康威胁,对社会和经济上处于不利地位的人群造成了不成比例的影响。国家行动计划对于协调国家反应至关重要,但它们在多大程度上解决公平问题仍不清楚。本研究评估了14个西非国家抗菌素耐药性国家行动计划如何纳入公平考虑。方法:我们使用四领域公平框架回顾了14个西非国家的抗微生物药物耐药性国家行动计划:(1)承认公平;(2)识别弱势群体;(3)纳入以公平为导向的干预措施;(4)将公平纳入治理和监测。我们评估了国家行动计划是否承认16个高危群体,包括艾滋病毒感染者、流离失所者或流动人口、儿童和青少年、老年人、精神健康障碍患者、农村居民、慢性病患者、残疾人、孕妇、低收入人群、卫生保健工作者、物质使用障碍患者、监禁人群、土著或少数群体。无家可归者、移民或季节工。结果:所有国家行动计划都采用了“一个健康”方针,但公平问题并未得到一致解决。大多数没有明确提及股权,也没有一个在监测框架中纳入与股权有关的指标。卫生保健工作者和农村人口是最常被提及的群体。常见的干预措施包括卫生宣传、公众意识运动和保健工作者培训,但这些措施大多是一般性的,很少适应边缘化人口的具体需要。利益攸关方的参与往往是多部门的,但很少能确保弱势群体的参与。在整个地区,缺乏分类数据和量身定制的战略凸显了巨大的公平差距。结论:公平仍未充分纳入西非的抗微生物药物耐药性治理。未来的国家行动计划必须明确确定高危人群,纳入公平指标,并让受影响社区参与规划和监督。嵌入公平对于建立有韧性和以人为本的抗微生物药物耐药性战略至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Tropical Medicine & International Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tropical Medicine & International Health is published on behalf of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Foundation Tropical Medicine and International Health, Belgian Institute of Tropical Medicine and Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine. Tropical Medicine & International Health is the official journal of the Federation of European Societies for Tropical Medicine and International Health (FESTMIH).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信