Scalable Tracking of Symptoms in the Electronic Health Record using Large Language Models in Patients with Central Nervous System Cancers Undergoing Therapy.

IF 13.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
John Y Rhee, Zachary Tentor, Thomas Sounack, Brigitte Durieux, Paul J Miller, Rameen Beroukhim, Charlotta Lindvall
{"title":"Scalable Tracking of Symptoms in the Electronic Health Record using Large Language Models in Patients with Central Nervous System Cancers Undergoing Therapy.","authors":"John Y Rhee, Zachary Tentor, Thomas Sounack, Brigitte Durieux, Paul J Miller, Rameen Beroukhim, Charlotta Lindvall","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noaf223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in large language models (LLMs) provide a means for scalable tracking of patient symptoms in clinical trials and post-marking surveillance using the electronic health record (EHR). Therefore, we sought to validate symptoms extracted from the EHR using a LLM to scale symptom extraction from the EHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Across a dataset of 499 randomly chosen clinical notes from patients seen in a neuro-oncology clinic, GPT-4o annotated symptoms (headache, fatigue, nausea, anxiety, difficulties sleeping, numbness and tingling, rash, constipation, and diarrhea) with an average sensitivity and specificity of 0.97 relative to expert manual review. We then applied the LLM to an external dataset of 51,541 notes representing 1,642 patients to obtain real-world symptom prevalence for temozolomide, bevacizumab, lomustine, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and methotrexate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the external dataset, the average number of symptoms per note was 3.92, and the most common symptom was fatigue (83% of patients). Surprisingly, patients receiving ICIs suffered from the most symptoms (mean = 4.68) and those receiving methotrexate had the least (mean = 2.92). We also found that the prevalence of reported symptoms in this real-world cohort was often much greater than the prevalence of reported symptoms in clinical trials of similar treatment regimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLMs offer the ability to scale symptom extraction from health records, which is crucial to understand symptom burden and power symptom-related interventions and studies in real-world patient cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advances in large language models (LLMs) provide a means for scalable tracking of patient symptoms in clinical trials and post-marking surveillance using the electronic health record (EHR). Therefore, we sought to validate symptoms extracted from the EHR using a LLM to scale symptom extraction from the EHR.

Methods: Across a dataset of 499 randomly chosen clinical notes from patients seen in a neuro-oncology clinic, GPT-4o annotated symptoms (headache, fatigue, nausea, anxiety, difficulties sleeping, numbness and tingling, rash, constipation, and diarrhea) with an average sensitivity and specificity of 0.97 relative to expert manual review. We then applied the LLM to an external dataset of 51,541 notes representing 1,642 patients to obtain real-world symptom prevalence for temozolomide, bevacizumab, lomustine, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and methotrexate.

Results: In the external dataset, the average number of symptoms per note was 3.92, and the most common symptom was fatigue (83% of patients). Surprisingly, patients receiving ICIs suffered from the most symptoms (mean = 4.68) and those receiving methotrexate had the least (mean = 2.92). We also found that the prevalence of reported symptoms in this real-world cohort was often much greater than the prevalence of reported symptoms in clinical trials of similar treatment regimens.

Conclusions: LLMs offer the ability to scale symptom extraction from health records, which is crucial to understand symptom burden and power symptom-related interventions and studies in real-world patient cohorts.

在接受治疗的中枢神经系统癌症患者中,使用大型语言模型对电子健康记录中的症状进行可扩展跟踪。
背景:大型语言模型(llm)的进步为临床试验中患者症状的可扩展跟踪和使用电子健康记录(EHR)的标记后监测提供了一种手段。因此,我们试图使用LLM来验证从EHR中提取的症状,以扩展从EHR中提取的症状。方法:在随机选择的499例神经肿瘤学临床记录的数据集中,gpt - 40注释了症状(头痛、疲劳、恶心、焦虑、睡眠困难、麻木和刺痛、皮疹、便秘和腹泻),相对于专家手动审查的平均敏感性和特异性为0.97。然后,我们将LLM应用于代表1,642名患者的51,541个记录的外部数据集,以获得替莫唑胺、贝伐单抗、洛莫司汀、免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)和甲氨蝶呤的真实症状患病率。结果:在外部数据集中,每个记录的平均症状数为3.92,最常见的症状是疲劳(83%的患者)。令人惊讶的是,接受ICIs治疗的患者症状最多(平均= 4.68),而接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者症状最少(平均= 2.92)。我们还发现,在这个真实世界的队列中,报告的症状的患病率通常比在类似治疗方案的临床试验中报告的症状的患病率要高得多。结论:llm提供了从健康记录中大规模提取症状的能力,这对于理解症状负担和在现实世界患者队列中进行与症状相关的干预和研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology
Neuro-oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
6.30%
发文量
1434
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field. The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信