Clinical Benefit From Molecularly Guided Cancer Care: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Larotrectinib Versus Standard of Care.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-19 DOI:10.1200/PO-25-00159
Carsten Bokemeyer, Keith R Abrams, Jesus Garcia-Foncillas, Antoine Italiano, Ulrik Lassen, Louise Linsell, Marisca Marian, Noman Paracha, Sean D Sullivan, Nicoletta Brega, Juliette Thompson
{"title":"Clinical Benefit From Molecularly Guided Cancer Care: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Larotrectinib Versus Standard of Care.","authors":"Carsten Bokemeyer, Keith R Abrams, Jesus Garcia-Foncillas, Antoine Italiano, Ulrik Lassen, Louise Linsell, Marisca Marian, Noman Paracha, Sean D Sullivan, Nicoletta Brega, Juliette Thompson","doi":"10.1200/PO-25-00159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Widespread adoption of the tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor larotrectinib has been hampered by limited comparisons against non-TRK inhibitor standard of care (SoC) regimens because of the rarity of TRK fusions. Cross-trial comparisons may be facilitated using matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), a validated methodology that balances baseline population characteristics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>MAIC was conducted using individual patient-level data from three larotrectinib trials, compared with aggregate real-world data (RWD) from adult patients with locally advanced/metastatic TRK fusion-positive cancer in the Hartwig Medical Foundation database. Patient populations were matched on available clinical characteristics. Estimates of overall survival (OS; defined as the time from start of first postbiopsy treatment [or larotrectinib] to death) were compared between larotrectinib and non-TRK inhibitor SoC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 24 patients receiving nontargeted TRK inhibitor SoC and 120 receiving larotrectinib. After matching, median OS was 50.3 months (IQR, 23.3-not estimable) for larotrectinib versus 13 months (IQR, 6.4-18.3) for SoC; larotrectinib was associated with an 84% risk reduction of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.36]). To account for the longer follow-up time in the larotrectinib group than in the SoC group (median: 56.7 <i>v</i> 23.2 months), a restricted mean survival analysis was conducted up to 26.2 months (largest observed event time in SoC arm), which showed median survival of 22.6 months for larotrectinib and 12.8 months for SoC (mean difference: 9.8 months [95% CI, 5.6 to 14.0]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with TRK fusion-positive cancer, larotrectinib was associated with a mean survival advantage of 9.8 months compared with non-TRK inhibitor SoC, corroborating favorable findings for larotrectinib from a previous analysis that used a different set of RWD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2500159"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Widespread adoption of the tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor larotrectinib has been hampered by limited comparisons against non-TRK inhibitor standard of care (SoC) regimens because of the rarity of TRK fusions. Cross-trial comparisons may be facilitated using matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), a validated methodology that balances baseline population characteristics.

Materials and methods: MAIC was conducted using individual patient-level data from three larotrectinib trials, compared with aggregate real-world data (RWD) from adult patients with locally advanced/metastatic TRK fusion-positive cancer in the Hartwig Medical Foundation database. Patient populations were matched on available clinical characteristics. Estimates of overall survival (OS; defined as the time from start of first postbiopsy treatment [or larotrectinib] to death) were compared between larotrectinib and non-TRK inhibitor SoC.

Results: The analysis included 24 patients receiving nontargeted TRK inhibitor SoC and 120 receiving larotrectinib. After matching, median OS was 50.3 months (IQR, 23.3-not estimable) for larotrectinib versus 13 months (IQR, 6.4-18.3) for SoC; larotrectinib was associated with an 84% risk reduction of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.36]). To account for the longer follow-up time in the larotrectinib group than in the SoC group (median: 56.7 v 23.2 months), a restricted mean survival analysis was conducted up to 26.2 months (largest observed event time in SoC arm), which showed median survival of 22.6 months for larotrectinib and 12.8 months for SoC (mean difference: 9.8 months [95% CI, 5.6 to 14.0]).

Conclusion: In patients with TRK fusion-positive cancer, larotrectinib was associated with a mean survival advantage of 9.8 months compared with non-TRK inhibitor SoC, corroborating favorable findings for larotrectinib from a previous analysis that used a different set of RWD.

分子引导癌症治疗的临床获益:larorectinib与标准治疗的匹配调整间接比较。
目的:由于TRK融合罕见,原肌球蛋白受体激酶(TRK)抑制剂larorectinib与非TRK抑制剂标准护理(SoC)方案的比较有限,因此广泛采用larorectinib受到阻碍。交叉试验比较可以使用匹配调整间接比较(MAIC),这是一种有效的方法,可以平衡基线人群特征。材料和方法:MAIC使用来自三个larotrectinib试验的个体患者水平数据进行,与Hartwig Medical Foundation数据库中局部晚期/转移性TRK融合阳性癌症成年患者的真实世界数据(RWD)进行比较。患者群体根据可用的临床特征进行匹配。比较larorectinib和非trk抑制剂SoC的总生存期(OS;定义为从第一次活检后治疗开始[或larorectinib]到死亡的时间)。结果:分析包括24例接受非靶向TRK抑制剂SoC治疗的患者和120例接受larorectinib治疗的患者。配对后,larotrectinib的中位OS为50.3个月(IQR, 23.3无法估计),而SoC的中位OS为13个月(IQR, 6.4-18.3);larorectinib与84%的死亡风险降低相关(校正风险比为0.16 [95% CI, 0.07 ~ 0.36])。为了解释larorectinib组比SoC组随访时间更长(中位数:56.7个月vs 23.2个月),进行了26.2个月(SoC组最大观察事件时间)的限制平均生存分析,结果显示larorectinib组的中位生存期为22.6个月,SoC组的中位生存期为12.8个月(平均差异:9.8个月[95% CI, 5.6至14.0])。结论:在TRK融合阳性癌症患者中,与非TRK抑制剂SoC相比,larorectinib的平均生存期优势为9.8个月,证实了先前使用不同RWD组的分析中larorectinib的有利结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信