Metagenomic Sequencing Reveals Distinct Gut Microbiome Profiles in Therapy-Naïve de Novo Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Eva Vermeer, Femke M Prins, Iwan J Hidding, Jasmijn Z Jagt, Robert de Jonge, Marc A Benninga, Ranko Gacesa, Rinse K Weersma, Nanne K H de Boer, Tim G J de Meij
{"title":"Metagenomic Sequencing Reveals Distinct Gut Microbiome Profiles in Therapy-Naïve de Novo Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.","authors":"Eva Vermeer, Femke M Prins, Iwan J Hidding, Jasmijn Z Jagt, Robert de Jonge, Marc A Benninga, Ranko Gacesa, Rinse K Weersma, Nanne K H de Boer, Tim G J de Meij","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izaf184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Microbiome studies reveal distinct microbial differences in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), indicating its potential role in pathophysiology and as a noninvasive diagnostic biomarker. This study aims to profile the gut microbiome in children with IBD, compared to both healthy controls (HC) and controls with gastrointestinal symptoms (CGI), and to assess the potential of microbiome profiles as noninvasive diagnostic markers for de novo treatment-naïve pediatric IBD, and as early predictive markers for therapy response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed baseline fecal samples and clinical data from 103 therapy-naïve children with IBD, 75 CGI, and 356 age and sex matched HC. Metagenomic sequencing was performed, and prediction models assessed diagnostic potential and prediction of induction therapy response at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Alpha diversity progressively decreased from HC to CGI (P < .001) and decreased even further in IBD patients (P = .0056). Beta diversity analysis showed significant clustering differences (P < .001, R2 = 0.045). Differential abundance analysis revealed 116 species differing between HC and IBD, and 30 species between CGI and IBD. Prediction models based on microbiome features accurately distinguished IBD from HC (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.96) and from CGI (AUC = 0.71). However, these models were outperformed by clinical features, such as fecal calprotectin. Microbiome-based prediction of response to induction therapy in general showed limited accuracy (AUC = 0.63), as well as for response to nutritional induction therapy (AUC = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed profound gut microbiome differences between de novo, therapy-naïve pediatric IBD patients and controls. While microbiome profiles hold promise for improving diagnostic precision, their predictive value for therapy response seems limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaf184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Microbiome studies reveal distinct microbial differences in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), indicating its potential role in pathophysiology and as a noninvasive diagnostic biomarker. This study aims to profile the gut microbiome in children with IBD, compared to both healthy controls (HC) and controls with gastrointestinal symptoms (CGI), and to assess the potential of microbiome profiles as noninvasive diagnostic markers for de novo treatment-naïve pediatric IBD, and as early predictive markers for therapy response.

Methods: We analyzed baseline fecal samples and clinical data from 103 therapy-naïve children with IBD, 75 CGI, and 356 age and sex matched HC. Metagenomic sequencing was performed, and prediction models assessed diagnostic potential and prediction of induction therapy response at 3 months.

Results: Alpha diversity progressively decreased from HC to CGI (P < .001) and decreased even further in IBD patients (P = .0056). Beta diversity analysis showed significant clustering differences (P < .001, R2 = 0.045). Differential abundance analysis revealed 116 species differing between HC and IBD, and 30 species between CGI and IBD. Prediction models based on microbiome features accurately distinguished IBD from HC (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.96) and from CGI (AUC = 0.71). However, these models were outperformed by clinical features, such as fecal calprotectin. Microbiome-based prediction of response to induction therapy in general showed limited accuracy (AUC = 0.63), as well as for response to nutritional induction therapy (AUC = 0.67).

Conclusions: We observed profound gut microbiome differences between de novo, therapy-naïve pediatric IBD patients and controls. While microbiome profiles hold promise for improving diagnostic precision, their predictive value for therapy response seems limited.

宏基因组测序揭示了Therapy-Naïve新生儿童炎症性肠病的不同肠道微生物组特征。
背景和目的:微生物组研究揭示了炎症性肠病(IBD)中明显的微生物差异,表明其在病理生理学中的潜在作用以及作为一种无创诊断生物标志物。本研究旨在与健康对照组(HC)和有胃肠道症状的对照组(CGI)进行比较,分析IBD儿童的肠道微生物组,并评估微生物组谱作为新生treatment-naïve儿童IBD的无创诊断标志物的潜力,以及作为治疗反应的早期预测标志物。方法:我们分析了103例therapy-naïve IBD患儿、75例CGI患儿和356例年龄和性别匹配的HC患儿的基线粪便样本和临床资料。进行宏基因组测序,预测模型评估诊断潜力和3个月时诱导治疗反应的预测。结果:α多样性从HC到CGI逐渐减少(P结论:我们观察到新生,therapy-naïve儿童IBD患者和对照组之间存在深刻的肠道微生物组差异。虽然微生物组谱有望提高诊断精度,但它们对治疗反应的预测价值似乎有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信