Assessing the feasibility of partner-implemented digital payment systems for health workers: stakeholder perspectives from Uganda's yellow fever mass vaccination campaign - a qualitative study.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Michael Ediau, Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho, Juliet Aweko, Charles Opio, Maggie Ssekitto Ashaba, Peter Waiswa
{"title":"Assessing the feasibility of partner-implemented digital payment systems for health workers: stakeholder perspectives from Uganda's yellow fever mass vaccination campaign - a qualitative study.","authors":"Michael Ediau, Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho, Juliet Aweko, Charles Opio, Maggie Ssekitto Ashaba, Peter Waiswa","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The heightening of efforts to eradicate vaccine-preventable diseases through mass vaccination campaigns has contributed to a growing demand for effective and efficient payment mechanisms for frontline vaccination workers in large-scale campaigns. Subsequently, the Uganda Ministry of Health (MoH) adopted digital payments for campaign workers, which were either implemented by the government or partners. We specifically explored stakeholder perspectives on the feasibility of partner-implemented digital payment to front-line health workers in phase one of the yellow fever mass vaccination campaign in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a cross-sectional qualitative study. The study area comprised four districts (Amuru, Lira, Hoima and Kikuuba) purposively selected from 51 phase one yellow fever vaccination campaign districts. We collected data through 37 qualitative interviews (25 key informant interviews (KIIs) and 12 in-depth interviews (IDIs)). IDI participants included vaccination health workers (n=12). KII interview participants included district technical officials (n=14), representatives of digital payment implementing partners at district and national levels (n=7) and MoH staff (n=4). All interviews were audio-recorded and later transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The partner-implemented payment system was linked with perceived improvements in timeliness and the increased likelihood of beneficiaries receiving complete payment. Despite these benefits, some payment delays were reported. These delays were mainly attributed to incomplete and inaccurate participant payment information. Health workers said they were more motivated because they felt assured of being paid and receiving the full amount.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite drawbacks, partner-led digital payment of health workers was perceived as a feasible strategy promoting timely, complete payments. Relevant stakeholders should ensure accurate, complete and timely capture and verification of health workers' payment details to counter payment delays. We recommend more rigorous evaluations to determine whether a partner-implementation of digital payment is more effective than government-led payment in different settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 Suppl 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The heightening of efforts to eradicate vaccine-preventable diseases through mass vaccination campaigns has contributed to a growing demand for effective and efficient payment mechanisms for frontline vaccination workers in large-scale campaigns. Subsequently, the Uganda Ministry of Health (MoH) adopted digital payments for campaign workers, which were either implemented by the government or partners. We specifically explored stakeholder perspectives on the feasibility of partner-implemented digital payment to front-line health workers in phase one of the yellow fever mass vaccination campaign in Uganda.

Methods: We employed a cross-sectional qualitative study. The study area comprised four districts (Amuru, Lira, Hoima and Kikuuba) purposively selected from 51 phase one yellow fever vaccination campaign districts. We collected data through 37 qualitative interviews (25 key informant interviews (KIIs) and 12 in-depth interviews (IDIs)). IDI participants included vaccination health workers (n=12). KII interview participants included district technical officials (n=14), representatives of digital payment implementing partners at district and national levels (n=7) and MoH staff (n=4). All interviews were audio-recorded and later transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: The partner-implemented payment system was linked with perceived improvements in timeliness and the increased likelihood of beneficiaries receiving complete payment. Despite these benefits, some payment delays were reported. These delays were mainly attributed to incomplete and inaccurate participant payment information. Health workers said they were more motivated because they felt assured of being paid and receiving the full amount.

Conclusions: Despite drawbacks, partner-led digital payment of health workers was perceived as a feasible strategy promoting timely, complete payments. Relevant stakeholders should ensure accurate, complete and timely capture and verification of health workers' payment details to counter payment delays. We recommend more rigorous evaluations to determine whether a partner-implementation of digital payment is more effective than government-led payment in different settings.

评估合作伙伴实施的卫生工作者数字支付系统的可行性:来自乌干达黄热病大规模疫苗接种运动的利益相关者观点——一项定性研究。
背景:通过大规模疫苗接种运动加强根除疫苗可预防疾病的努力,导致对大规模运动中一线疫苗接种工作者有效和高效支付机制的需求日益增加。随后,乌干达卫生部(MoH)采用了由政府或合作伙伴实施的竞选工作人员数字支付方式。在乌干达黄热病大规模疫苗接种运动的第一阶段,我们专门探讨了利益攸关方对合作伙伴实施的向一线卫生工作者提供数字支付的可行性的看法。方法:采用横断面定性研究。研究区包括四个区(阿穆鲁、里拉、霍伊马和基库巴),这些区是有意从51个第一阶段黄热病疫苗接种运动区中选择的。我们通过37个定性访谈(25个关键信息者访谈(KIIs)和12个深度访谈(IDIs))收集数据。IDI参与者包括疫苗接种卫生工作者(n=12)。KII访谈的参与者包括地区技术官员(n=14)、地区和国家层面数字支付实施伙伴的代表(n=7)和卫生部工作人员(n=4)。所有访谈都进行了录音,然后用专题分析进行转录和分析。结果:合作伙伴实施的支付系统与时效性的感知改善和受益人获得完整付款的可能性增加有关。尽管有这些好处,但据报道仍有一些付款延迟。这些延迟主要是由于参与者支付信息不完整和不准确。卫生工作者说,他们更有动力,因为他们感到得到了报酬,并得到了全额。结论:尽管存在缺陷,但合作伙伴主导的卫生工作者数字支付被认为是促进及时、完整支付的可行策略。相关利益攸关方应确保准确、完整和及时地获取和核查卫生工作者的付款细节,以防止付款延误。我们建议进行更严格的评估,以确定合作伙伴实施的数字支付在不同情况下是否比政府主导的支付更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信