Improving the detection and documentation of suspected cauda equina syndrome: a quality improvement project.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maiar Elhariry, Tahir Khaleeq, Rachna Prem, Kanthan Theivendran
{"title":"Improving the detection and documentation of suspected cauda equina syndrome: a quality improvement project.","authors":"Maiar Elhariry, Tahir Khaleeq, Rachna Prem, Kanthan Theivendran","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but critical neurological emergency. Prompt diagnosis and accurate documentation are essential to avoid permanent neurological impairment. This quality improvement project aimed to improve the accuracy and completeness of neurological examination documentation for patients presenting with suspected CES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, a digitally prompted documentation tool '#CES' was developed and implemented in the electronic patient record system. The tool was designed in alignment with the 2019 GIRFT Spine Report and 2023 GIRFT National CES Pathway. It included red flag symptoms and neurological assessment criteria from the ASIA classification. A teaching session on its use was delivered in January before the second data collection period (19 September 2024-20 October 2024), and it was later incorporated into resident doctor induction in December before the third data collection period (5 January 2025-5 February 2025).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the initial cycle (May-August 2024), documentation was inconsistent, particularly for sensory (0%) and reflex (4.9%) examination. Following implementation and a teaching session (September 2024), documentation improved in the second cycle (September-October 2024): sensation (81.3%), reflexes (57.1%), though tone and motor documentation declined. In the third cycle (January-February 2025), full template use rose to 80% (from 25%) and documentation further improved: sensation (94.1%), motor (64.7%), reflexes (64.7%), tone (64.7%), vascular (58.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A CES-specific, digitally prompted template significantly improved documentation quality. Integration of GIRFT red flags, clinician codesign and repeated education enhanced uptake and accuracy. Further PDSA cycles will focus on sustainability, time-to-diagnosis metrics and addressing clinician workload concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but critical neurological emergency. Prompt diagnosis and accurate documentation are essential to avoid permanent neurological impairment. This quality improvement project aimed to improve the accuracy and completeness of neurological examination documentation for patients presenting with suspected CES.

Methods: Using three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, a digitally prompted documentation tool '#CES' was developed and implemented in the electronic patient record system. The tool was designed in alignment with the 2019 GIRFT Spine Report and 2023 GIRFT National CES Pathway. It included red flag symptoms and neurological assessment criteria from the ASIA classification. A teaching session on its use was delivered in January before the second data collection period (19 September 2024-20 October 2024), and it was later incorporated into resident doctor induction in December before the third data collection period (5 January 2025-5 February 2025).

Results: In the initial cycle (May-August 2024), documentation was inconsistent, particularly for sensory (0%) and reflex (4.9%) examination. Following implementation and a teaching session (September 2024), documentation improved in the second cycle (September-October 2024): sensation (81.3%), reflexes (57.1%), though tone and motor documentation declined. In the third cycle (January-February 2025), full template use rose to 80% (from 25%) and documentation further improved: sensation (94.1%), motor (64.7%), reflexes (64.7%), tone (64.7%), vascular (58.8%).

Conclusions: A CES-specific, digitally prompted template significantly improved documentation quality. Integration of GIRFT red flags, clinician codesign and repeated education enhanced uptake and accuracy. Further PDSA cycles will focus on sustainability, time-to-diagnosis metrics and addressing clinician workload concerns.

改进疑似马尾综合征的检测和记录:一个质量改进项目。
背景:马尾综合征(CES)是一种罕见但严重的神经系统急症。及时诊断和准确记录对于避免永久性神经损伤至关重要。本质量改进项目旨在提高疑似CES患者神经系统检查文件的准确性和完整性。方法:采用三个计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)周期,开发了数字提示文档工具“#CES”并在电子病历系统中实施。该工具是根据2019年GIRFT脊柱报告和2023年GIRFT国家CES路径设计的。它包括危险信号症状和来自亚洲分类的神经学评估标准。在第二个数据收集期(2024年9月19日至2024年10月20日)之前,于1月举办了一次关于其使用的教学课程,后来在第三个数据收集期(2025年1月5日至2025年2月5日)之前,于12月将其纳入住院医师入门课程。结果:在第一个周期(2024年5 - 8月),记录不一致,特别是感觉检查(0%)和反射检查(4.9%)。在实施和教学课程(2024年9月)之后,第二个周期(2024年9月至10月)的记录有所改善:感觉(81.3%),反射(57.1%),尽管音调和运动记录有所下降。在第三个周期(2025年1月至2月),完整模板的使用从25%上升到80%,记录进一步改善:感觉(94.1%),运动(64.7%),反射(64.7%),音调(64.7%),血管(58.8%)。结论:特定于ces的数字提示模板显著提高了文档质量。将GIRFT的危险信号、临床医生共同设计和反复教育相结合,提高了接受度和准确性。进一步的PDSA周期将侧重于可持续性、诊断时间指标和解决临床医生工作量问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信