Somatotopic non-invasive proprioceptive feedback strategy for prosthetic hands: a preliminary study.

IF 1.6 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Olivier Lecompte, Sofiane Achiche, Amandine Gesta, Abolfazl Mohebbi
{"title":"Somatotopic non-invasive proprioceptive feedback strategy for prosthetic hands: a preliminary study.","authors":"Olivier Lecompte, Sofiane Achiche, Amandine Gesta, Abolfazl Mohebbi","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ae093e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Robotic hand prosthesis users often identify the lack of physiological feedback as a major obstacle to seamless integration. Both the low controllability and high cognitive load required to operate these devices generally lead to their rejection. Consequently, experts highlight sensory feedback as a critical missing features of commercial prostheses. Providing feedback that promotes the integration of artificial limbs is often sought through a biomimetic paradigm, limited by the current technological landscape and the absence of neural embodiment in users. As a result, some researchers are now turning to bio-inspired approaches, choosing to repurpose existing neural structures and focusing on underlying neurocognitive mechanisms that promote the integration of artificial inputs.<i>Approach.</i>Taking a bio-inspired approach, this paper describes the first implementation of a somatotopic, non-invasive proprioceptive feedback strategy for hand prosthesis users, developed using a standard sensory restoration architecture, i.e. pre-processing, encoding and stimulation. The main hypothesis investigated is whether a novel use of transcutaneous electrical stimulation can be leveraged to deliver proprioceptive information of the hand to the user.<i>Main results.</i>The potential of the proposed strategy was highlighted via experimental validation in conveying specific finger apertures and grasp types related to single and multiple degrees of freedom. Six participants were able to identify apertures conveyed by median and ulnar nerve stimulation with an accuracy of 96.5% ± 2.3% and a response time of 0.91 s ± 0.08 s, as well as grasp types conveyed from concurrent median and ulnar nerve stimulation with an accuracy of 88.3% ± 1.2% and a response time of 0.44 s ± 0.27 s through 5 sets of 10 trials.<i>Significance.</i>These results demonstrate the relevance of a somatotopic proprioception feedback strategy for users of prosthetic hands, and the architecture presented in this case study allows for future optimization of the various sub-components.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ae093e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.Robotic hand prosthesis users often identify the lack of physiological feedback as a major obstacle to seamless integration. Both the low controllability and high cognitive load required to operate these devices generally lead to their rejection. Consequently, experts highlight sensory feedback as a critical missing features of commercial prostheses. Providing feedback that promotes the integration of artificial limbs is often sought through a biomimetic paradigm, limited by the current technological landscape and the absence of neural embodiment in users. As a result, some researchers are now turning to bio-inspired approaches, choosing to repurpose existing neural structures and focusing on underlying neurocognitive mechanisms that promote the integration of artificial inputs.Approach.Taking a bio-inspired approach, this paper describes the first implementation of a somatotopic, non-invasive proprioceptive feedback strategy for hand prosthesis users, developed using a standard sensory restoration architecture, i.e. pre-processing, encoding and stimulation. The main hypothesis investigated is whether a novel use of transcutaneous electrical stimulation can be leveraged to deliver proprioceptive information of the hand to the user.Main results.The potential of the proposed strategy was highlighted via experimental validation in conveying specific finger apertures and grasp types related to single and multiple degrees of freedom. Six participants were able to identify apertures conveyed by median and ulnar nerve stimulation with an accuracy of 96.5% ± 2.3% and a response time of 0.91 s ± 0.08 s, as well as grasp types conveyed from concurrent median and ulnar nerve stimulation with an accuracy of 88.3% ± 1.2% and a response time of 0.44 s ± 0.27 s through 5 sets of 10 trials.Significance.These results demonstrate the relevance of a somatotopic proprioception feedback strategy for users of prosthetic hands, and the architecture presented in this case study allows for future optimization of the various sub-components.

假手体位无创本体感觉反馈策略的初步研究。
目的:机械手假体使用者经常认为缺乏生理反馈是无缝集成的主要障碍。操作这些设备所需的低可控性和高认知负荷通常导致它们被拒绝。因此,专家强调感官反馈是商业假肢的一个关键缺失功能。提供促进假肢整合的反馈通常是通过仿生学范式寻求的,这受到当前技术前景和用户缺乏神经体现的限制。因此,一些研究人员现在转向生物启发的方法,选择重新利用现有的神经结构,并专注于促进人工输入整合的潜在神经认知机制。方法:采用生物启发的方法,本文描述了使用标准感觉恢复架构(即预处理,编码和刺激)开发的手部假体使用者的躯体性,非侵入性本体感觉反馈策略的首次实现。研究的主要假设是,是否可以利用经皮电刺激的新方法将手的本体感觉信息传递给使用者。主要结果:通过实验验证,强调了该策略在传递与单自由度和多自由度相关的特定手指孔径和抓取类型方面的潜力。通过5组10次试验,6名被试能够识别正中尺神经刺激传递的孔径,准确率为96.5%±2.3%,反应时间为0.91 s±0.08 s;同时识别正中尺神经刺激传递的抓取类型,准确率为88.3%±1.2%,反应时间为0.44 s±0.27 s。意义:这些结果证明了假肢手使用者的体位本体感觉反馈策略的相关性,并且本案例研究中提出的 ;架构允许未来对各个子组件进行优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信