Accuracy of glomerular filtration rate estimates among patients with cancer.

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Jennifer S Lees, Edouard L Fu, Anne-Laure Faucon, Benjamin Mp Elyan, Lesley A Inker, Andrew S Levey, Robert J Jones, Richard H Wilson, Patrick B Mark, Juan-Jesus Carrero
{"title":"Accuracy of glomerular filtration rate estimates among patients with cancer.","authors":"Jennifer S Lees, Edouard L Fu, Anne-Laure Faucon, Benjamin Mp Elyan, Lesley A Inker, Andrew S Levey, Robert J Jones, Richard H Wilson, Patrick B Mark, Juan-Jesus Carrero","doi":"10.1038/s41416-025-03190-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation is a key issue in determining cancer treatment eligibility and dosing of treatments with narrow therapeutic index. Yet, little is known about the accuracy of GFR estimation among people with cancer in routine care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study including 1611 adults with cancer referred for 1837 determinations of measured GFR (mGFR), we assessed the accuracy of estimated GFR based on creatinine (eGFRcr), cystatin C (eGFRcys) and their combination (eGFRcr-cys). Accuracy was reported as percentage of patients with estimated values within 30% of mGFR; bias and precision as the median and interquartile range of eGFR-mGFR, respectively. Dosing accuracy was assessed by calculating expected dose of carboplatin for area under the curve of 5 mg/mL/min using the Calvert formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 68 (IQI 61 to 74) years, 38.5% were female with mean mGFR 75 (SD 30) mL/min; 17% had metastatic disease. Accuracy, bias and precision were best for eGFRcr-cys. Using eGFRcr would recommend an \"overdose\" of carboplatin in 10-20% of participants: this was 3-4 times less common using eGFRcr-cys.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>eGFRcr-cys equations provide the most accurate estimates of mGFR in patients with cancer, with potential to improve dosing accuracy substantially compared to eGFRcr.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03190-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation is a key issue in determining cancer treatment eligibility and dosing of treatments with narrow therapeutic index. Yet, little is known about the accuracy of GFR estimation among people with cancer in routine care.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study including 1611 adults with cancer referred for 1837 determinations of measured GFR (mGFR), we assessed the accuracy of estimated GFR based on creatinine (eGFRcr), cystatin C (eGFRcys) and their combination (eGFRcr-cys). Accuracy was reported as percentage of patients with estimated values within 30% of mGFR; bias and precision as the median and interquartile range of eGFR-mGFR, respectively. Dosing accuracy was assessed by calculating expected dose of carboplatin for area under the curve of 5 mg/mL/min using the Calvert formula.

Results: Median age was 68 (IQI 61 to 74) years, 38.5% were female with mean mGFR 75 (SD 30) mL/min; 17% had metastatic disease. Accuracy, bias and precision were best for eGFRcr-cys. Using eGFRcr would recommend an "overdose" of carboplatin in 10-20% of participants: this was 3-4 times less common using eGFRcr-cys.

Conclusion: eGFRcr-cys equations provide the most accurate estimates of mGFR in patients with cancer, with potential to improve dosing accuracy substantially compared to eGFRcr.

癌症患者肾小球滤过率估计的准确性。
背景:肾小球滤过率(GFR)的估计是确定癌症治疗资格和窄治疗指数治疗剂量的关键问题。然而,在常规治疗的癌症患者中,对GFR估计的准确性知之甚少。方法:在一项横断研究中,包括1611名成年癌症患者,进行了1837次GFR测定,我们评估了基于肌酐(eGFRcr)、胱抑素C (eGFRcys)及其组合(eGFRcr-cys)估计GFR的准确性。准确性报告为估计值在mGFR的30%以内的患者百分比;偏差和精度分别作为eGFR-mGFR的中位数和四分位数范围。采用卡尔弗特公式计算曲线下面积卡铂的预期剂量,以评估给药准确性。结果:中位年龄68岁(IQI 61 ~ 74),女性38.5%,平均mGFR 75 (SD 30) mL/min;17%有转移性疾病。eGFRcr-cys的准确度、偏倚和精密度最高。使用eGFRcr会建议10-20%的参与者“过量”使用卡铂:使用eGFRcr-cys时,这种情况要少3-4倍。结论:eGFRcr-cys方程提供了最准确的癌症患者mGFR估计,与eGFRcr相比,有可能大大提高给药准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信