Systematic Review of Ischiatic Hernia: Diagnostic Challenges, Surgical Evolution, and Outcomes.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Fahim Kanani, Khaled Otman, Alaa Zahalka, Naheel Mahajna, Narmin Zoabi, Katia Dayan, Nir Messer
{"title":"Systematic Review of Ischiatic Hernia: Diagnostic Challenges, Surgical Evolution, and Outcomes.","authors":"Fahim Kanani, Khaled Otman, Alaa Zahalka, Naheel Mahajna, Narmin Zoabi, Katia Dayan, Nir Messer","doi":"10.1177/00031348251378904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionIschiatic (sciatic) hernias represent one of the rarest forms of pelvic floor herniation, with fewer than 100 documented cases worldwide since first described by Papen in 1750. Their rarity, combined with often-cryptic clinical presentation, contributes to significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from 1947 to 2024, identifying 68 relevant articles. Our search strategy combined terms related to ischiatic/sciatic hernias with various publication types. Data extraction focused on patient demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, hernia contents, surgical approaches, and outcomes.ResultsOur analysis revealed striking female predominance (98.5%), particularly among elderly patients (mean age 71 ± 12.8 years). Ureter was the most commonly herniated structure (58.8%), followed by small intestine (20.6%). Most patients (80.9%) lacked an external gluteal bulge, contributing to diagnostic delays. CT emerged as the primary diagnostic modality (63.2%), with the pathognomonic \"curlicue sign\" representing a key feature in ureterosciatic herniation. Management approaches were evenly distributed between minimally invasive techniques (35.3%), open surgery (35.3%), and conservative management with ureteral stenting (29.4%). Laparoscopic and robotic approaches demonstrated shorter hospital stays (1-2 days vs 5-14 days for open repairs) and reduced postoperative pain, despite slightly longer operative times. Complication rates were low (5.9% surgical site infections), with no reported mortality.ConclusionIschiatic hernias require a high index of clinical suspicion for timely diagnosis, particularly in elderly females presenting with unexplained pelvic or sciatic pain. The evolution from open to minimally invasive surgical approaches has significantly transformed management outcomes, while ureteral stenting offers an alternative for high-risk patients with ureterosciatic hernias. The optimal approach remains individualized based on patient characteristics, hernia contents, and available surgical expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251378904"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251378904","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionIschiatic (sciatic) hernias represent one of the rarest forms of pelvic floor herniation, with fewer than 100 documented cases worldwide since first described by Papen in 1750. Their rarity, combined with often-cryptic clinical presentation, contributes to significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from 1947 to 2024, identifying 68 relevant articles. Our search strategy combined terms related to ischiatic/sciatic hernias with various publication types. Data extraction focused on patient demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, hernia contents, surgical approaches, and outcomes.ResultsOur analysis revealed striking female predominance (98.5%), particularly among elderly patients (mean age 71 ± 12.8 years). Ureter was the most commonly herniated structure (58.8%), followed by small intestine (20.6%). Most patients (80.9%) lacked an external gluteal bulge, contributing to diagnostic delays. CT emerged as the primary diagnostic modality (63.2%), with the pathognomonic "curlicue sign" representing a key feature in ureterosciatic herniation. Management approaches were evenly distributed between minimally invasive techniques (35.3%), open surgery (35.3%), and conservative management with ureteral stenting (29.4%). Laparoscopic and robotic approaches demonstrated shorter hospital stays (1-2 days vs 5-14 days for open repairs) and reduced postoperative pain, despite slightly longer operative times. Complication rates were low (5.9% surgical site infections), with no reported mortality.ConclusionIschiatic hernias require a high index of clinical suspicion for timely diagnosis, particularly in elderly females presenting with unexplained pelvic or sciatic pain. The evolution from open to minimally invasive surgical approaches has significantly transformed management outcomes, while ureteral stenting offers an alternative for high-risk patients with ureterosciatic hernias. The optimal approach remains individualized based on patient characteristics, hernia contents, and available surgical expertise.

坐骨疝的系统回顾:诊断挑战、手术进展和结果。
坐骨(坐骨)疝是骨盆底疝最罕见的形式之一,自1750年Papen首次描述以来,全世界记录的病例不到100例。它们的罕见性,加上临床表现往往模糊不清,给诊断和治疗带来了重大挑战。方法遵循PRISMA指南,系统检索PubMed, Embase和Cochrane数据库,从1947年到2024年,确定了68篇相关文章。我们的搜索策略将与坐骨/坐骨疝相关的术语与各种出版物类型相结合。数据提取的重点是患者人口统计学、临床表现、诊断方法、疝内容物、手术入路和结果。结果我们的分析显示明显的女性优势(98.5%),特别是在老年患者中(平均年龄71±12.8岁)。输尿管是最常见的疝出部位(58.8%),其次是小肠(20.6%)。大多数患者(80.9%)缺乏臀外隆起,导致诊断延迟。CT是输尿管神经疝的主要诊断方式(63.2%),典型的“曲线征”是输尿管神经神经疝的主要特征。治疗方法平均分布在微创技术(35.3%)、开放手术(35.3%)和输尿管支架置入术(29.4%)。腹腔镜和机器人入路的住院时间较短(1-2天,而开放修复为5-14天),尽管手术时间稍长,但术后疼痛减轻。并发症发生率低(手术部位感染5.9%),无死亡报告。结论坐骨疝需要高度的临床怀疑才能及时诊断,特别是老年女性出现不明原因的骨盆或坐骨疼痛。从开放手术到微创手术的发展已经显著地改变了治疗结果,而输尿管支架置入术为输尿管坐骨疝高危患者提供了另一种选择。最佳的方法仍然是根据患者的特点、疝内容物和可用的外科专业知识进行个体化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信