{"title":"Efficacy and safety of a millimetre wave medical device for pain neuromodulation in peripheral osteoarthritis: a crossover randomised trial.","authors":"Caroline Maindet,Joris Giai,Corentin Leroy,Marion Proust,Gilliane Lalami,Isabelle Boudry,Marlène Thiers,Jean-Luc Bosson,Laurent Grange","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keaf486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nTo manage osteoarthritis (OA)-related pain, current guidelines recommend a combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments. The objective of this study was to assess a millimetre-wave-emitting medical device (MD) for neuromodulation of pain in patients with peripheral OA.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn this monocentric, prospective, crossover, randomised controlled trial, 60 patients with peripheral OA affecting joints (ankle, knee, hip, shoulder, elbow, and fingers) and a pain score ≥ 4 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were recruited and randomly assigned to one of two crossover sequences. The primary outcome was self-assessed pain, while secondary outcomes included life and sleep quality.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 60 patients included, 31 were randomly assigned to the OFF/ON sequence and 29 to the ON/OFF sequence. The baseline mean pain scores for the groups was 6.05 (SD = 1.36) and 6.31 (SD = 1.52) on the VAS, respectively. During the MD use period, the mean daily VAS pain score was 4.57 (SD = 2), compared with 5.32 (SD = 1.77) during the period without MD use. The mean paired difference between periods was 0.74 (SD = 1.77). This difference was statistically significant (p= 0.002). The corresponding effect size was 0.42. No carryover, sequence, or period effects were observed. Secondary outcomes related to quality of life and sleep quality showed significant improvement with MD use. No serious adverse events were reported.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nIn patients with peripheral OA, regular use of this MD significantly reduced in pain (VAS), improved both quality of life (EQ5D-5L) and sleep quality (VAS). Future research should focus on individualised benefit-risk balance, incorporating patient preferences.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION\r\nClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04590079.","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To manage osteoarthritis (OA)-related pain, current guidelines recommend a combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments. The objective of this study was to assess a millimetre-wave-emitting medical device (MD) for neuromodulation of pain in patients with peripheral OA.
METHODS
In this monocentric, prospective, crossover, randomised controlled trial, 60 patients with peripheral OA affecting joints (ankle, knee, hip, shoulder, elbow, and fingers) and a pain score ≥ 4 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were recruited and randomly assigned to one of two crossover sequences. The primary outcome was self-assessed pain, while secondary outcomes included life and sleep quality.
RESULTS
Of the 60 patients included, 31 were randomly assigned to the OFF/ON sequence and 29 to the ON/OFF sequence. The baseline mean pain scores for the groups was 6.05 (SD = 1.36) and 6.31 (SD = 1.52) on the VAS, respectively. During the MD use period, the mean daily VAS pain score was 4.57 (SD = 2), compared with 5.32 (SD = 1.77) during the period without MD use. The mean paired difference between periods was 0.74 (SD = 1.77). This difference was statistically significant (p= 0.002). The corresponding effect size was 0.42. No carryover, sequence, or period effects were observed. Secondary outcomes related to quality of life and sleep quality showed significant improvement with MD use. No serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSION
In patients with peripheral OA, regular use of this MD significantly reduced in pain (VAS), improved both quality of life (EQ5D-5L) and sleep quality (VAS). Future research should focus on individualised benefit-risk balance, incorporating patient preferences.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04590079.
期刊介绍:
Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press.
Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.