Jian Zhou, Zijian Liu, Chuanqi Li, Kun Du, Manoj Khandelwal
{"title":"Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Cutting Force of Tunnel Boring Machine: A Study on SVR With Meta‐Heuristic Optimization","authors":"Jian Zhou, Zijian Liu, Chuanqi Li, Kun Du, Manoj Khandelwal","doi":"10.1002/nag.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs) have been widely adopted in the construction of large‐scale and long‐distance rock tunnels. However, accurately predicting the cutting forces of disc cutters remains a significant challenge. To address this issue, a Support Vector Regression (SVR) model was introduced in this study to predict the normal force (FN) and rolling force (FR) based on an established dataset. To improve prediction accuracy, the SVR model's hyperparameters were optimized using three nature‐inspired algorithms: Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Crayfish Optimization Algorithm (COA). Performance evaluations using R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, VAF, NES, RMSE, and MAE demonstrated that the proposed hybrid models (WOA‐SVR, COA‐SVR, and PSO‐SVR) significantly outperformed traditional empirical and semi‐theoretical models, such as the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) model. Among these, the PSO‐SVR model yielded the best results (FN prediction: 0.9657, 96.5241%, 0.9652, 15.0258, 11.6712; FR prediction: 0.9691, 95.3219%, 0.9517, 2.3272, 1.6531). Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model‐agnostic Explanations (LIME) were employed to enhance model interpretability. The analysis revealed that uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), cutter penetration depth (P), and disc cutter spacing (S) play a pivotal role in the accurate prediction of FN and FR. Additionally, a MATLAB‐based visual interface was developed to provide practical technical support for optimizing real‐world TBM tunneling performance.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs) have been widely adopted in the construction of large‐scale and long‐distance rock tunnels. However, accurately predicting the cutting forces of disc cutters remains a significant challenge. To address this issue, a Support Vector Regression (SVR) model was introduced in this study to predict the normal force (FN) and rolling force (FR) based on an established dataset. To improve prediction accuracy, the SVR model's hyperparameters were optimized using three nature‐inspired algorithms: Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Crayfish Optimization Algorithm (COA). Performance evaluations using R2, VAF, NES, RMSE, and MAE demonstrated that the proposed hybrid models (WOA‐SVR, COA‐SVR, and PSO‐SVR) significantly outperformed traditional empirical and semi‐theoretical models, such as the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) model. Among these, the PSO‐SVR model yielded the best results (FN prediction: 0.9657, 96.5241%, 0.9652, 15.0258, 11.6712; FR prediction: 0.9691, 95.3219%, 0.9517, 2.3272, 1.6531). Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model‐agnostic Explanations (LIME) were employed to enhance model interpretability. The analysis revealed that uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), cutter penetration depth (P), and disc cutter spacing (S) play a pivotal role in the accurate prediction of FN and FR. Additionally, a MATLAB‐based visual interface was developed to provide practical technical support for optimizing real‐world TBM tunneling performance.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.