Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Cutting Force of Tunnel Boring Machine: A Study on SVR With Meta‐Heuristic Optimization

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jian Zhou, Zijian Liu, Chuanqi Li, Kun Du, Manoj Khandelwal
{"title":"Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Cutting Force of Tunnel Boring Machine: A Study on SVR With Meta‐Heuristic Optimization","authors":"Jian Zhou, Zijian Liu, Chuanqi Li, Kun Du, Manoj Khandelwal","doi":"10.1002/nag.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs) have been widely adopted in the construction of large‐scale and long‐distance rock tunnels. However, accurately predicting the cutting forces of disc cutters remains a significant challenge. To address this issue, a Support Vector Regression (SVR) model was introduced in this study to predict the normal force (FN) and rolling force (FR) based on an established dataset. To improve prediction accuracy, the SVR model's hyperparameters were optimized using three nature‐inspired algorithms: Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Crayfish Optimization Algorithm (COA). Performance evaluations using R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, VAF, NES, RMSE, and MAE demonstrated that the proposed hybrid models (WOA‐SVR, COA‐SVR, and PSO‐SVR) significantly outperformed traditional empirical and semi‐theoretical models, such as the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) model. Among these, the PSO‐SVR model yielded the best results (FN prediction: 0.9657, 96.5241%, 0.9652, 15.0258, 11.6712; FR prediction: 0.9691, 95.3219%, 0.9517, 2.3272, 1.6531). Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model‐agnostic Explanations (LIME) were employed to enhance model interpretability. The analysis revealed that uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), cutter penetration depth (P), and disc cutter spacing (S) play a pivotal role in the accurate prediction of FN and FR. Additionally, a MATLAB‐based visual interface was developed to provide practical technical support for optimizing real‐world TBM tunneling performance.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs) have been widely adopted in the construction of large‐scale and long‐distance rock tunnels. However, accurately predicting the cutting forces of disc cutters remains a significant challenge. To address this issue, a Support Vector Regression (SVR) model was introduced in this study to predict the normal force (FN) and rolling force (FR) based on an established dataset. To improve prediction accuracy, the SVR model's hyperparameters were optimized using three nature‐inspired algorithms: Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Crayfish Optimization Algorithm (COA). Performance evaluations using R2, VAF, NES, RMSE, and MAE demonstrated that the proposed hybrid models (WOA‐SVR, COA‐SVR, and PSO‐SVR) significantly outperformed traditional empirical and semi‐theoretical models, such as the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) model. Among these, the PSO‐SVR model yielded the best results (FN prediction: 0.9657, 96.5241%, 0.9652, 15.0258, 11.6712; FR prediction: 0.9691, 95.3219%, 0.9517, 2.3272, 1.6531). Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model‐agnostic Explanations (LIME) were employed to enhance model interpretability. The analysis revealed that uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), cutter penetration depth (P), and disc cutter spacing (S) play a pivotal role in the accurate prediction of FN and FR. Additionally, a MATLAB‐based visual interface was developed to provide practical technical support for optimizing real‐world TBM tunneling performance.
基于可解释机器学习的隧道掘进机切削力预测:基于元启发式优化的SVR研究
隧道掘进机在大型、长距离岩石隧道施工中得到了广泛的应用。然而,准确预测盘式铣刀的切削力仍然是一个重大的挑战。为了解决这一问题,本研究基于已建立的数据集,引入支持向量回归(SVR)模型来预测法向力(FN)和滚动力(FR)。为了提高预测精度,采用鲸鱼优化算法(WOA)、粒子群优化算法(PSO)和小龙虾优化算法(COA)三种自然启发算法对SVR模型的超参数进行优化。使用R2、VAF、NES、RMSE和MAE进行的绩效评估表明,所提出的混合模型(WOA‐SVR、COA‐SVR和PSO‐SVR)显著优于传统的经验和半理论模型,如科罗拉多矿业学院(CSM)模型。其中,PSO‐SVR模型效果最好(FN预测值分别为0.9657、96.5241%、0.9652、15.0258、11.6712;FR预测值分别为0.9691、95.3219%、0.9517、2.3272、1.6531)。此外,采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)和局部可解释模型不可知论解释(LIME)来提高模型的可解释性。分析表明,单轴抗压强度(UCS)、刀具穿透深度(P)和盘式刀具间距(S)在准确预测FN和FR方面起着关键作用。此外,开发了基于MATLAB的可视化界面,为优化现实世界的TBM掘进性能提供实用技术支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信