Effects of stand structural diversity on carbon storage of Masson pine forests in Fengyang Mountain Nature Reserve, China.

IF 5
Forestry research Pub Date : 2025-06-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.48130/forres-0025-0010
Yongzhao Miao, Ran Tong, Nianfu Zhu, Song Chen, Fang Zhou, G Geoff Wang, Tonggui Wu
{"title":"Effects of stand structural diversity on carbon storage of Masson pine forests in Fengyang Mountain Nature Reserve, China.","authors":"Yongzhao Miao, Ran Tong, Nianfu Zhu, Song Chen, Fang Zhou, G Geoff Wang, Tonggui Wu","doi":"10.48130/forres-0025-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stand structural diversity, encompassing spatial and non-spatial dimensions, is a key indicator of forest carbon storage, yet its relative impacts on multiple carbon pools remain unclear. Additionally, whether structural diversity consistently influences carbon storage across overstory, understory, and soil layers is uncertain. This study examined carbon storage dynamics across 13 secondary Masson pine forests within the Fengyang Mountain Nature Reserve. Principal component analysis was used to classify the stands into three types based on their spatial and non-spatial structural diversity: Type I (high spatial and high non-spatial diversity), Type II (high spatial but low non-spatial diversity), and Type III (low spatial and low non-spatial diversity). Total carbon storage was highest in Type I, while carbon storage in the understory layers was lowest in this type. Spatial structural diversity had a stronger influence on carbon storage than non-spatial diversity, with the uniform angle index primarily affecting overstory carbon storage, and the crowding index influenced understory carbon storage. Random forest analysis identified biomass and structural diversity as major predictors of carbon storage. Partial least squares path modeling revealed that spatial structural diversity indirectly increased overstory and soil carbon storage, but reduced understory carbon storage by modulating biomass. Our results highlight that spatial structural diversity is a dominant driver of carbon storage in forest ecosystems, with contrasting effects on overstory, understory, and soil layers, underscoring its critical role in regulating forest carbon dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":520285,"journal":{"name":"Forestry research","volume":"5 ","pages":"e011"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forestry research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48130/forres-0025-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stand structural diversity, encompassing spatial and non-spatial dimensions, is a key indicator of forest carbon storage, yet its relative impacts on multiple carbon pools remain unclear. Additionally, whether structural diversity consistently influences carbon storage across overstory, understory, and soil layers is uncertain. This study examined carbon storage dynamics across 13 secondary Masson pine forests within the Fengyang Mountain Nature Reserve. Principal component analysis was used to classify the stands into three types based on their spatial and non-spatial structural diversity: Type I (high spatial and high non-spatial diversity), Type II (high spatial but low non-spatial diversity), and Type III (low spatial and low non-spatial diversity). Total carbon storage was highest in Type I, while carbon storage in the understory layers was lowest in this type. Spatial structural diversity had a stronger influence on carbon storage than non-spatial diversity, with the uniform angle index primarily affecting overstory carbon storage, and the crowding index influenced understory carbon storage. Random forest analysis identified biomass and structural diversity as major predictors of carbon storage. Partial least squares path modeling revealed that spatial structural diversity indirectly increased overstory and soil carbon storage, but reduced understory carbon storage by modulating biomass. Our results highlight that spatial structural diversity is a dominant driver of carbon storage in forest ecosystems, with contrasting effects on overstory, understory, and soil layers, underscoring its critical role in regulating forest carbon dynamics.

凤阳山自然保护区马尾松林分结构多样性对碳储量的影响
林分结构多样性包括空间和非空间维度,是森林碳储量的关键指标,但其对多个碳库的相对影响尚不清楚。此外,结构多样性是否持续影响林下、林下和土层的碳储量是不确定的。本文研究了凤阳山自然保护区13个次生马尾松林的碳储量动态变化。采用主成分分析方法,根据林分的空间和非空间结构多样性将林分分为3种类型:1型(高空间和高非空间多样性)、2型(高空间但低非空间多样性)和3型(低空间和低非空间多样性)。总碳储量以ⅰ型最高,林下碳储量最低。空间结构多样性对林下碳储量的影响强于非空间多样性,均匀角度指数主要影响林下碳储量,而拥挤度指数影响林下碳储量。随机森林分析发现生物量和结构多样性是碳储量的主要预测因子。偏最小二乘路径模型表明,空间结构多样性间接增加了林下碳储量和土壤碳储量,但通过调节生物量降低了林下碳储量。研究结果表明,空间结构多样性是森林生态系统碳储量的主要驱动因素,在林下、林下和土壤中具有不同的影响,在调节森林碳动态中具有重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信