Disrupting Drug Costs: The Role of Cost-Plus Pricing in Reducing Medicare Spending on Hypertension Treatments.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jacob Duncan, Andrew V Tran, Ryan Witt, Annes Elfar, Matthew Rashid, Matt Vassar
{"title":"Disrupting Drug Costs: The Role of Cost-Plus Pricing in Reducing Medicare Spending on Hypertension Treatments.","authors":"Jacob Duncan, Andrew V Tran, Ryan Witt, Annes Elfar, Matthew Rashid, Matt Vassar","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess potential Medicare cost savings if Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) pricing were applied to antihypertensive medications.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis comparing Medicare Part D spending with MCCPDC pricing for selected antihypertensive drugs.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Eighty-seven antihypertensive medications were compared between Medicare Part D and MCCPDC. Volume-adjusted expenditure estimates were calculated under three scenarios: (1) applying MCCPDC prices to all medications, (2) applying MCCPDC prices only to drugs priced lower than Medicare, and (3) applying MCCPDC prices to guideline-recommended first-line therapies.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>In 2022, Medicare spent $4.9 billion on the included medications. Of these, 39 of the 30-count and 58 of the 90-count medications showed cost savings under MCCPDC pricing. Estimated savings totaled $670.1 million (30-count) and $1.4 billion (90-count). Among 47 first-line agents, MCCPDC pricing produced estimated savings of $222.6 million (30-count) and $584.1 million (90-count). The average 90-count price reduction was 23.2% overall and 21.1% among first-line therapies, with several agents showing substantial price advantages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adopting MCCPDC pricing could reduce Medicare costs for antihypertensive drugs, especially through 90-count supplies and first-line therapies. Targeted implementation-focusing on medications with clear cost and clinical advantages-may yield meaningful savings. These results support broader policy efforts to incorporate transparent, value-based drug pricing models into Medicare.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70045"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess potential Medicare cost savings if Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) pricing were applied to antihypertensive medications.

Study setting and design: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis comparing Medicare Part D spending with MCCPDC pricing for selected antihypertensive drugs.

Data sources and analytic sample: Eighty-seven antihypertensive medications were compared between Medicare Part D and MCCPDC. Volume-adjusted expenditure estimates were calculated under three scenarios: (1) applying MCCPDC prices to all medications, (2) applying MCCPDC prices only to drugs priced lower than Medicare, and (3) applying MCCPDC prices to guideline-recommended first-line therapies.

Principal findings: In 2022, Medicare spent $4.9 billion on the included medications. Of these, 39 of the 30-count and 58 of the 90-count medications showed cost savings under MCCPDC pricing. Estimated savings totaled $670.1 million (30-count) and $1.4 billion (90-count). Among 47 first-line agents, MCCPDC pricing produced estimated savings of $222.6 million (30-count) and $584.1 million (90-count). The average 90-count price reduction was 23.2% overall and 21.1% among first-line therapies, with several agents showing substantial price advantages.

Conclusion: Adopting MCCPDC pricing could reduce Medicare costs for antihypertensive drugs, especially through 90-count supplies and first-line therapies. Targeted implementation-focusing on medications with clear cost and clinical advantages-may yield meaningful savings. These results support broader policy efforts to incorporate transparent, value-based drug pricing models into Medicare.

扰乱药物成本:成本加成定价在减少高血压治疗医疗保险支出中的作用。
目的:评估采用Mark Cuban成本加药公司(MCCPDC)定价抗高血压药物可能节省的医疗费用。研究设置和设计:我们进行了一项横断面分析,比较了选定抗高血压药物的医疗保险D部分支出与MCCPDC定价。数据来源和分析样本:比较医疗保险D部分和MCCPDC的87种抗高血压药物。按数量调整后的支出估算是在三种情况下计算的:(1)对所有药物采用MCCPDC价格,(2)仅对价格低于医保的药物采用MCCPDC价格,以及(3)对指南推荐的一线治疗采用MCCPDC价格。主要发现:2022年,医疗保险在纳入的药物上花费了49亿美元。其中,在MCCPDC定价下,30种药物中的39种和90种药物中的58种显示出成本节约。估计总共节省了6.701亿美元(30计数)和14亿美元(90计数)。在47个一线代理商中,MCCPDC定价预计节省2.226亿美元(30个计数)和5.841亿美元(90个计数)。总体而言,平均90计数的价格下降了23.2%,一线治疗的价格下降了21.1%,有几种药物显示出明显的价格优势。结论:采用MCCPDC定价可降低抗高血压药物的医保成本,特别是通过90计数供应和一线治疗。有针对性的实施——专注于具有明确成本和临床优势的药物——可能会产生有意义的节省。这些结果支持更广泛的政策努力,将透明的、基于价值的药品定价模型纳入医疗保险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信