Reducing the Length of Time Psychiatric Patients Who Are Assessed as Requiring an Adult Mental Health Inpatient Bed Spend in the Emergency Department; a Systemic Quality Improvement Journey.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Louise Hunter, Deborah McSparron
{"title":"Reducing the Length of Time Psychiatric Patients Who Are Assessed as Requiring an Adult Mental Health Inpatient Bed Spend in the Emergency Department; a Systemic Quality Improvement Journey.","authors":"Louise Hunter, Deborah McSparron","doi":"10.1111/jpm.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Presenting problem: </strong>There are significant pressures on Adult Mental Health Crisis and Inpatient Services, which is a complex and fragile system. This has led to psychiatric patients spending protracted waits in emergency departments (ED) for access to a mental health inpatient bed. This paper describes a large-scale improvement project that adopts a systemic approach to understanding the problem and testing change ideas generated by staff to bring about improvement. The SQUIRE guidelines were followed in writing this paper.</p><p><strong>Tests of change: </strong>The change ideas tested were: Testing of a 7 Day Assessment Centre to provide an alternative pathway for low risk patients waiting in ED. This facilitates a longer period of assessment for the patient and enables the provision of short-term intervention, stabilising the patient and decreasing the reliance on an inpatient admission. Testing of the Side by Side Model, which promotes joint assessment and care planning for mental health patients presenting in the ED experiencing a crisis. Adult Mental Health and ED professionals work collaboratively, thereby reducing the length of time the patient is waiting in ED to determine an assessment outcome and to find the right care pathway. Improved Interface working between Inpatient and Community Services to facilitate timely discharge and address the delayed discharge position, improving overall flow in the system.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Quality improvement methodologies were adopted to engage staff in the process and to measure the impact of change ideas. There has been evidence of improvement in the system with regards to: a reduction in the length of time that psychiatric patients are waiting in ED to complete their assessment and determine the right care pathway, a reduction in admissions to our adult mental health inpatient wards and reduced bed occupancy, an increase in patients discharged on a community pathway, a reduction in the number of patients waiting in ED, a reduction in the delayed discharge position and the number of patients becoming delayed in adult mental health inpatient wards through better interface working. This has led to overall decreased pressures on the ED system, better utilisation of resources and improved staff and patient experience. This quality improvement journey has given staff an opportunity to build confidence in the use of QI methodology and tools, to test ideas that they believe will and have made a difference, to give them a voice in the process, to inspire hope around what the future service might look like, to celebrate success in their achievements and to allow them to express what matters to them. All of this has contributed to fostering an improvement culture across adult mental health services and re-energised staff working in really challenging and pressurised environments.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>This paper discusses change ideas that front line staff working within Adult Mental Health Services have tested to reduce the length of time that psychiatric patients are waiting in Emergency Departments to access the most appropriate care and support. In this process staff were acknowledged and recognised as subject experts in their field and given autonomy to test their own ideas that may lead to better patient outcomes and improved experience. Quality Improvement tools and methodologies were used to help staff to understand the complexities of the system that they work within and to measure the impact of their change ideas. This work provides some useful insights and learning that would benefit the wider system where sustained pressures exist due to reduced bed capacity and flow, leading to protracted waits for psychiatric patients in Emergency Departments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.70028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Presenting problem: There are significant pressures on Adult Mental Health Crisis and Inpatient Services, which is a complex and fragile system. This has led to psychiatric patients spending protracted waits in emergency departments (ED) for access to a mental health inpatient bed. This paper describes a large-scale improvement project that adopts a systemic approach to understanding the problem and testing change ideas generated by staff to bring about improvement. The SQUIRE guidelines were followed in writing this paper.

Tests of change: The change ideas tested were: Testing of a 7 Day Assessment Centre to provide an alternative pathway for low risk patients waiting in ED. This facilitates a longer period of assessment for the patient and enables the provision of short-term intervention, stabilising the patient and decreasing the reliance on an inpatient admission. Testing of the Side by Side Model, which promotes joint assessment and care planning for mental health patients presenting in the ED experiencing a crisis. Adult Mental Health and ED professionals work collaboratively, thereby reducing the length of time the patient is waiting in ED to determine an assessment outcome and to find the right care pathway. Improved Interface working between Inpatient and Community Services to facilitate timely discharge and address the delayed discharge position, improving overall flow in the system.

Outcomes: Quality improvement methodologies were adopted to engage staff in the process and to measure the impact of change ideas. There has been evidence of improvement in the system with regards to: a reduction in the length of time that psychiatric patients are waiting in ED to complete their assessment and determine the right care pathway, a reduction in admissions to our adult mental health inpatient wards and reduced bed occupancy, an increase in patients discharged on a community pathway, a reduction in the number of patients waiting in ED, a reduction in the delayed discharge position and the number of patients becoming delayed in adult mental health inpatient wards through better interface working. This has led to overall decreased pressures on the ED system, better utilisation of resources and improved staff and patient experience. This quality improvement journey has given staff an opportunity to build confidence in the use of QI methodology and tools, to test ideas that they believe will and have made a difference, to give them a voice in the process, to inspire hope around what the future service might look like, to celebrate success in their achievements and to allow them to express what matters to them. All of this has contributed to fostering an improvement culture across adult mental health services and re-energised staff working in really challenging and pressurised environments.

Relevance statement: This paper discusses change ideas that front line staff working within Adult Mental Health Services have tested to reduce the length of time that psychiatric patients are waiting in Emergency Departments to access the most appropriate care and support. In this process staff were acknowledged and recognised as subject experts in their field and given autonomy to test their own ideas that may lead to better patient outcomes and improved experience. Quality Improvement tools and methodologies were used to help staff to understand the complexities of the system that they work within and to measure the impact of their change ideas. This work provides some useful insights and learning that would benefit the wider system where sustained pressures exist due to reduced bed capacity and flow, leading to protracted waits for psychiatric patients in Emergency Departments.

减少被评估为需要成人精神健康住院病人在急诊科花费的时间系统的质量改进之旅。
目前的问题:成人心理健康危机和住院服务的压力很大,这是一个复杂而脆弱的系统。这导致精神病患者在急诊科(ED)长时间等待获得精神健康住院床位。本文描述了一个大规模的改善项目,该项目采用系统的方法来理解问题,并测试员工提出的改变想法,以实现改善。在撰写本文时遵循了SQUIRE的指导方针。改变的测试:测试的改变想法是:测试一个7天评估中心,为在急诊科等待的低风险患者提供另一种途径。这有利于对患者进行更长时间的评估,并能够提供短期干预,稳定患者并减少对住院患者的依赖。测试的并肩模式,促进联合评估和护理计划的精神健康患者呈现在急诊科经历危机。成人心理健康和急诊科专业人员协同工作,从而减少了患者在急诊科等待确定评估结果和找到正确护理途径的时间。改善住院和社区服务之间的接口工作,促进及时出院,解决延迟出院的情况,改善系统的整体流程。结果:采用了质量改进方法,让员工参与到过程中来,并衡量改变想法的影响。有证据表明,该系统在以下方面有所改善:减少精神病患者在急诊科等待完成评估并确定正确护理途径的时间,减少成人精神健康住院病房的入院人数,减少床位占用,增加社区途径出院的患者,减少在急诊科等待的患者数量,通过优化接口工作,减少成人心理健康住院病房延迟出院位置和延迟出院人数。这导致了对急诊科系统的整体压力降低,更好地利用资源,改善了工作人员和患者的体验。这次质量改进之旅让员工有机会建立对使用质量评价方法和工具的信心,测试他们认为会有所作为的想法,让他们在这个过程中发表意见,激发对未来服务的希望,庆祝他们取得的成就,并允许他们表达对他们重要的事情。所有这些都有助于在成人心理健康服务中培养一种改进文化,并使在真正具有挑战性和压力的环境中工作的工作人员重新充满活力。相关声明:本文讨论了在成人心理健康服务部门工作的一线工作人员已经测试的改变想法,以减少精神病患者在急诊科等待获得最适当护理和支持的时间长度。在这个过程中,工作人员被承认和认可为各自领域的学科专家,并被赋予自主权来测试他们自己的想法,这些想法可能会带来更好的患者结果和改善的体验。质量改进工具和方法被用来帮助员工理解他们工作的系统的复杂性,并测量他们的变更想法的影响。这项工作提供了一些有用的见解和学习,将有利于更广泛的系统,因为床位容量和流量减少而持续存在压力,导致精神病患者在急诊科等待时间延长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing is an international journal which publishes research and scholarly papers that advance the development of policy, practice, research and education in all aspects of mental health nursing. We publish rigorously conducted research, literature reviews, essays and debates, and consumer practitioner narratives; all of which add new knowledge and advance practice globally. All papers must have clear implications for mental health nursing either solely or part of multidisciplinary practice. Papers are welcomed which draw on single or multiple research and academic disciplines. We give space to practitioner and consumer perspectives and ensure research published in the journal can be understood by a wide audience. We encourage critical debate and exchange of ideas and therefore welcome letters to the editor and essays and debates in mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信