Procedural Pain Assessments for Neonates at Risk of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome: A Scoping Review.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Julianna Lavergne, Erin Langman, Deborah Mansell, Justine Dol, Britney Benoit
{"title":"Procedural Pain Assessments for Neonates at Risk of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Julianna Lavergne, Erin Langman, Deborah Mansell, Justine Dol, Britney Benoit","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify evidence for pain assessment during acute procedures in hospitalized neonates at risk of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was conducted using the JBI scoping review methodology. The search strategy focused on identifying in-patient neonates undergoing acute painful procedures. Databases searched are MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, and Scopus. The relevant data were extracted by two reviewers and the results were summarized in a narrative description and presented in a tabular format including the components of participants, concept, and context (PCC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22,731 unique studies were screened, with five studies ultimately included. Of these studies, two included neonates at risk of NOWS but did not report pain responses separately. The three remaining studies observed procedural pain in opioid-exposed neonates compared to neonates without opioid exposure during heel lance. Pain assessment methods included physiologic responses and validated composite pain scores. When using composite pain tools, one study showed higher pain response in opioid-exposed neonates, while the other two studies showed the same or lower pain response. For skin conductance the findings from two studies were discrepant, with one study reporting higher pain response in opioid-exposed neonates and the other showing no statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is a need for more studies designed to examine the influence of opioid exposure and withdrawal on pain responding and management in neonates. As there is currently limited evidence to guide clinical care, clinicians should continue to use validated composite pain assessment tools and pain management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify evidence for pain assessment during acute procedures in hospitalized neonates at risk of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).

Methods: This scoping review was conducted using the JBI scoping review methodology. The search strategy focused on identifying in-patient neonates undergoing acute painful procedures. Databases searched are MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, and Scopus. The relevant data were extracted by two reviewers and the results were summarized in a narrative description and presented in a tabular format including the components of participants, concept, and context (PCC).

Results: A total of 22,731 unique studies were screened, with five studies ultimately included. Of these studies, two included neonates at risk of NOWS but did not report pain responses separately. The three remaining studies observed procedural pain in opioid-exposed neonates compared to neonates without opioid exposure during heel lance. Pain assessment methods included physiologic responses and validated composite pain scores. When using composite pain tools, one study showed higher pain response in opioid-exposed neonates, while the other two studies showed the same or lower pain response. For skin conductance the findings from two studies were discrepant, with one study reporting higher pain response in opioid-exposed neonates and the other showing no statistically significant difference.

Discussion: There is a need for more studies designed to examine the influence of opioid exposure and withdrawal on pain responding and management in neonates. As there is currently limited evidence to guide clinical care, clinicians should continue to use validated composite pain assessment tools and pain management strategies.

新生儿阿片类戒断综合征风险的程序性疼痛评估:范围审查。
目的:确定有新生儿阿片类戒断综合征(NOWS)风险的住院新生儿急性手术期间疼痛评估的证据。方法:采用JBI范围审查方法进行范围审查。搜索策略的重点是识别正在经历急性疼痛手术的住院新生儿。检索的数据库有MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、PsycInfo和Scopus。相关数据由两名审稿人提取,结果以叙述性描述进行总结,并以表格形式呈现,包括参与者、概念和背景(PCC)的组成部分。结果:总共筛选了22,731项独特的研究,最终纳入了5项研究。在这些研究中,有两项研究包括有NOWS风险的新生儿,但没有单独报告疼痛反应。剩下的三项研究观察了阿片类药物暴露的新生儿与没有阿片类药物暴露的新生儿在脚跟穿刺期间的程序性疼痛。疼痛评估方法包括生理反应和经过验证的复合疼痛评分。当使用复合疼痛工具时,一项研究显示阿片类药物暴露的新生儿有更高的疼痛反应,而另外两项研究显示相同或更低的疼痛反应。对于皮肤电导,两项研究的结果是不一致的,一项研究报告阿片类药物暴露的新生儿有更高的疼痛反应,而另一项研究没有统计学上的显著差异。讨论:需要更多的研究来研究阿片类药物暴露和戒断对新生儿疼痛反应和管理的影响。由于目前指导临床护理的证据有限,临床医生应继续使用经过验证的复合疼痛评估工具和疼痛管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信