Dawn R. Cochrane , Gian Luca Negri , Jutta Huvila , Forouh Kalantari , David A. Farnell , Nissreen Mohammad , Emily Thompson , Winnie Yang , Amy Lum , Sandra E. Spencer , Ryan Riley , Amy Jamieson , Samuel Leung , Derek Chiu , Christine Chow , Jamie L.P. Lim , Martin Köbel , Stefan Kommoss , Friedrich Kommoss , Blake Gilks , Jessica N. McAlpine
{"title":"Proteomic analysis uncovers biological diversity in molecularly defined endometrial carcinomas","authors":"Dawn R. Cochrane , Gian Luca Negri , Jutta Huvila , Forouh Kalantari , David A. Farnell , Nissreen Mohammad , Emily Thompson , Winnie Yang , Amy Lum , Sandra E. Spencer , Ryan Riley , Amy Jamieson , Samuel Leung , Derek Chiu , Christine Chow , Jamie L.P. Lim , Martin Köbel , Stefan Kommoss , Friedrich Kommoss , Blake Gilks , Jessica N. McAlpine","doi":"10.1016/j.neo.2025.101229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While endometrial cancer has an overall favorable prognosis, some patients have poor outcomes and may benefit from further refinements of the current classification systems. Molecular classification stratifies endometrial cancer patients into four prognostic subtypes: <em>POLE</em>mut, MMRd (mismatch repair deficient), p53abn, and NSMP (no specific molecular profile), where patients with <em>POLE</em>mut have the best prognosis and p53abn has the worst prognosis. We used proteomic profiling to assess if additional prognostic or predictive information could be identified across or within molecular subtypes. Global proteome profiling of formalin fixed, paraffin embedded samples, that had clinicopathologic and outcome data, was performed on 184 endometrial cancers encompassing all four molecular subtypes, including replicate samples of the same tumor, and both biopsy and final hysterectomy specimens. To ensure representation of each subtype, we profiled an approximately equal distribution in the 148 unique tumors; 34 (23%) <em>POLE</em>mut, 40 (27%) MMRd, 35 (24%) p53abn and 39 (26%) NSMP, rather than the population-based distributions. There was high reproducibility in the proteomic profiles of intra-tumor replicate samples, and between matched biopsy and hysterectomy tumor samples. Consensus clustering identified four clusters with different prognosis, named ‘Adhesion’, ‘Immune’, ‘Proliferation’, and ‘Metabolic’ based on the functional characteristics of the enriched proteins. We associated protein expression features with common mutations, molecular subtype, and outcomes. These results demonstrate the biologic diversity within endometrial cancers, both between and within molecular subtypes, and provide candidate features for functional and clinical investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18917,"journal":{"name":"Neoplasia","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101229"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neoplasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476558625001095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While endometrial cancer has an overall favorable prognosis, some patients have poor outcomes and may benefit from further refinements of the current classification systems. Molecular classification stratifies endometrial cancer patients into four prognostic subtypes: POLEmut, MMRd (mismatch repair deficient), p53abn, and NSMP (no specific molecular profile), where patients with POLEmut have the best prognosis and p53abn has the worst prognosis. We used proteomic profiling to assess if additional prognostic or predictive information could be identified across or within molecular subtypes. Global proteome profiling of formalin fixed, paraffin embedded samples, that had clinicopathologic and outcome data, was performed on 184 endometrial cancers encompassing all four molecular subtypes, including replicate samples of the same tumor, and both biopsy and final hysterectomy specimens. To ensure representation of each subtype, we profiled an approximately equal distribution in the 148 unique tumors; 34 (23%) POLEmut, 40 (27%) MMRd, 35 (24%) p53abn and 39 (26%) NSMP, rather than the population-based distributions. There was high reproducibility in the proteomic profiles of intra-tumor replicate samples, and between matched biopsy and hysterectomy tumor samples. Consensus clustering identified four clusters with different prognosis, named ‘Adhesion’, ‘Immune’, ‘Proliferation’, and ‘Metabolic’ based on the functional characteristics of the enriched proteins. We associated protein expression features with common mutations, molecular subtype, and outcomes. These results demonstrate the biologic diversity within endometrial cancers, both between and within molecular subtypes, and provide candidate features for functional and clinical investigation.
期刊介绍:
Neoplasia publishes the results of novel investigations in all areas of oncology research. The title Neoplasia was chosen to convey the journal’s breadth, which encompasses the traditional disciplines of cancer research as well as emerging fields and interdisciplinary investigations. Neoplasia is interested in studies describing new molecular and genetic findings relating to the neoplastic phenotype and in laboratory and clinical studies demonstrating creative applications of advances in the basic sciences to risk assessment, prognostic indications, detection, diagnosis, and treatment. In addition to regular Research Reports, Neoplasia also publishes Reviews and Meeting Reports. Neoplasia is committed to ensuring a thorough, fair, and rapid review and publication schedule to further its mission of serving both the scientific and clinical communities by disseminating important data and ideas in cancer research.