Health care utilization and cost of diagnostic testing for respiratory infections.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Azia Evans, Riddhi Doshi, Jason Yeaw, Katharine Coyle, Steven E Goldberg, Elizabeth J Wang, Maren S Fragala, Jairus Reddy
{"title":"Health care utilization and cost of diagnostic testing for respiratory infections.","authors":"Azia Evans, Riddhi Doshi, Jason Yeaw, Katharine Coyle, Steven E Goldberg, Elizabeth J Wang, Maren S Fragala, Jairus Reddy","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared all-cause health care resource use (HCRU) and costs between patients with acute oropharyngeal infections and respiratory tract infections (RTIs) receiving targeted syndromic real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests with next-day results vs matched patients receiving other/no diagnostic tests.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Propensity-matched, retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cohorts with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for diagnosis or symptom(s) of oropharyngeal infection or RTI (first diagnosis = index) on an outpatient claim were identified in the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database (July 2020-October 2023). HCRU and costs were examined over 6 months post index across 5 subcohorts: patients receiving syndromic RT-PCR and 4 matched subcohorts (other PCR, point-of-care [POC] only, culture, or no test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) costs for postindex total outpatient services ($2598 [$7564] vs $2970 [$8417]; P < .0001), physician office visit ($624 [$1150] vs $689 [$1082]; P = .0002), emergency department (ED) ($290 [$1145] vs $397 [$1630]; P = .0192), and other medical services ($1684 [$6799] vs $1883 [$7568]; P < .0001) were significantly lower for the oropharyngeal RT-PCR subcohort than the matched culture subcohort. The mean (SD) postindex costs for any outpatient medical services ($2796 [$11,453] vs $3221 [$7873]; P < .0001), physician office visits ($525 [$974] vs $703 [$2635]; P = .0057), ED visits ($253 [$1036] vs $355 [$1300]; P = .0011), and other medical services ($2018 [$10,986] vs $2163 [$6458]; P < .0001) were significantly lower for the RTI RT-PCR subcohort than the matched culture subcohort. Patients in both RT-PCR subcohorts had lower utilization of other medical services and any outpatient services compared with all matched comparator subcohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This propensity-matched study provides evidence on the economic impact of syndromic RT-PCR tests for respiratory infections, highlighting their advantages over traditional diagnostic methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 9","pages":"e249-e257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared all-cause health care resource use (HCRU) and costs between patients with acute oropharyngeal infections and respiratory tract infections (RTIs) receiving targeted syndromic real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests with next-day results vs matched patients receiving other/no diagnostic tests.

Study design: Propensity-matched, retrospective study.

Methods: Two cohorts with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for diagnosis or symptom(s) of oropharyngeal infection or RTI (first diagnosis = index) on an outpatient claim were identified in the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database (July 2020-October 2023). HCRU and costs were examined over 6 months post index across 5 subcohorts: patients receiving syndromic RT-PCR and 4 matched subcohorts (other PCR, point-of-care [POC] only, culture, or no test).

Results: The mean (SD) costs for postindex total outpatient services ($2598 [$7564] vs $2970 [$8417]; P < .0001), physician office visit ($624 [$1150] vs $689 [$1082]; P = .0002), emergency department (ED) ($290 [$1145] vs $397 [$1630]; P = .0192), and other medical services ($1684 [$6799] vs $1883 [$7568]; P < .0001) were significantly lower for the oropharyngeal RT-PCR subcohort than the matched culture subcohort. The mean (SD) postindex costs for any outpatient medical services ($2796 [$11,453] vs $3221 [$7873]; P < .0001), physician office visits ($525 [$974] vs $703 [$2635]; P = .0057), ED visits ($253 [$1036] vs $355 [$1300]; P = .0011), and other medical services ($2018 [$10,986] vs $2163 [$6458]; P < .0001) were significantly lower for the RTI RT-PCR subcohort than the matched culture subcohort. Patients in both RT-PCR subcohorts had lower utilization of other medical services and any outpatient services compared with all matched comparator subcohorts.

Conclusions: This propensity-matched study provides evidence on the economic impact of syndromic RT-PCR tests for respiratory infections, highlighting their advantages over traditional diagnostic methods.

卫生保健利用和呼吸道感染诊断检测的费用。
目的:本研究比较了急性口咽感染和呼吸道感染(RTIs)患者接受有第二天结果的靶向综合征实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测与接受其他/未接受诊断检测的匹配患者之间的全因卫生保健资源使用(HCRU)和成本。研究设计:倾向匹配,回顾性研究。方法:在IQVIA PharMetrics Plus数据库(2020年7月- 2023年10月)中识别两个队列,这些队列使用国际疾病分类第十版临床修改代码诊断或症状口咽感染或门诊索赔中的RTI(首次诊断=索引)。HCRU和成本在指数后6个月内在5个亚队列中进行检查:接受综合征性RT-PCR的患者和4个匹配的亚队列(其他PCR,仅在护理点[POC]进行,培养或不进行检测)。结果:指数后总门诊服务的平均(SD)费用(2598美元[7564美元]vs 2970美元[8417美元]);P结论:本倾向匹配研究为呼吸道感染综合征RT-PCR检测的经济影响提供了证据,突出了其相对于传统诊断方法的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信