["Accessing lucid data that is specific to the region": Implementation and evaluation of an online platform for research data in the Rhineland metropolitan region using the example of health care research in the last year of life].

IF 1.7 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Kathleen Boström, Katja Blaschke, Thomas Dojan, Ingo Meyer, Kerstin Kremeike
{"title":"[\"Accessing lucid data that is specific to the region\": Implementation and evaluation of an online platform for research data in the Rhineland metropolitan region using the example of health care research in the last year of life].","authors":"Kathleen Boström, Katja Blaschke, Thomas Dojan, Ingo Meyer, Kerstin Kremeike","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare research results often do not find their way into practice due to missing or under-utilized communication channels. Consequently, these results fail to impact the healthcare system. To bridge this \"translation gap,\" solutions tailored to the needs and habits of users are required.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conceptualized and implemented an online platform to communicate the results of two completed healthcare research projects to both professionals and the public in Cologne. This was achieved using a co-design approach with end users. The platform was evaluated for user satisfaction, efficiency, effectiveness, conformity with expectations, and usage through participant observation, an online survey, and web statistics analysis. A final redesign was conducted based on the evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The platform was implemented according to the co-design concept. Most online survey participants found the site easy to use and engaging in terms of content. However, criticisms included the lack of multimedia and interactive content, the large amount of text used, and the absence of specific expected information.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>After the redesign, the platform met part of the requirements emerging from the evaluation. Nonetheless, improvements are needed in multimedia and interactive content presentation, as identified in the evaluation. The lack of specific expected content highlights unanswered research questions of the underlying projects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed platform has been online since the end of the development phase and continues to be used. The study demonstrated that a co-design approach can yield usable results in the field of science.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2025.08.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare research results often do not find their way into practice due to missing or under-utilized communication channels. Consequently, these results fail to impact the healthcare system. To bridge this "translation gap," solutions tailored to the needs and habits of users are required.

Methods: We conceptualized and implemented an online platform to communicate the results of two completed healthcare research projects to both professionals and the public in Cologne. This was achieved using a co-design approach with end users. The platform was evaluated for user satisfaction, efficiency, effectiveness, conformity with expectations, and usage through participant observation, an online survey, and web statistics analysis. A final redesign was conducted based on the evaluation.

Results: The platform was implemented according to the co-design concept. Most online survey participants found the site easy to use and engaging in terms of content. However, criticisms included the lack of multimedia and interactive content, the large amount of text used, and the absence of specific expected information.

Discussion: After the redesign, the platform met part of the requirements emerging from the evaluation. Nonetheless, improvements are needed in multimedia and interactive content presentation, as identified in the evaluation. The lack of specific expected content highlights unanswered research questions of the underlying projects.

Conclusion: The developed platform has been online since the end of the development phase and continues to be used. The study demonstrated that a co-design approach can yield usable results in the field of science.

[“获取特定区域的清晰数据”:莱茵兰大都市区研究数据在线平台的实施和评估,以生命最后一年的医疗保健研究为例]。
导读:由于缺少或未充分利用沟通渠道,医疗保健研究成果往往无法付诸实践。因此,这些结果无法影响医疗保健系统。为了弥合这种“翻译差距”,需要针对用户的需求和习惯量身定制解决方案。方法:我们构思并实施了一个在线平台,将两个已完成的医疗保健研究项目的结果传达给科隆的专业人员和公众。这是通过与最终用户的协同设计方法实现的。通过参与观察、在线调查和网络统计分析,对该平台的用户满意度、效率、有效性、与预期的一致性和使用情况进行了评估。最后在评估的基础上进行了重新设计。结果:平台按照协同设计理念实现。大多数在线调查参与者发现,该网站易于使用,内容引人入胜。然而,批评包括缺乏多媒体和互动内容,使用大量文本,以及缺乏具体的预期信息。讨论:重新设计之后,平台满足了评估中出现的部分需求。尽管如此,在评价中指出的多媒体和交互式内容表示方面仍需改进。缺乏具体的预期内容突出了基础项目未解决的研究问题。结论:开发的平台在开发阶段结束后已经上线,并继续使用。该研究表明,协同设计方法可以在科学领域产生可用的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信