Dual-function robotic gripper for traction and closure in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: an in vivo porcine model study (with video).

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sang Hyun Kim, Ye Chan Seo, Bora Keum, Han Jo Jeon, Jae Min Lee, Hyuk Soon Choi, Eun Sun Kim, Yoon Tae Jeen, Hong Sik Lee, Joo Ha Hwang, Hoon Jai Chun
{"title":"Dual-function robotic gripper for traction and closure in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: an in vivo porcine model study (with video).","authors":"Sang Hyun Kim, Ye Chan Seo, Bora Keum, Han Jo Jeon, Jae Min Lee, Hyuk Soon Choi, Eun Sun Kim, Yoon Tae Jeen, Hong Sik Lee, Joo Ha Hwang, Hoon Jai Chun","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12182-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically complex procedure associated with prolonged operative duration and a heightened risk of complications. To enhance procedural efficiency and safety, various adjunctive techniques have been introduced, particularly for tissue traction and mucosal defect closure. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a novel robotic dual-function gripper capable of performing both tissue traction and defect approximation in an in vivo model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dual-function robotic gripper was developed to facilitate submucosal dissection and post-ESD closure. Comparative experiments were conducted using robot-assisted ESD (RESD) and conventional ESD (CESD) on 24 gastric lesions created in six live pigs. In the RESD group, mucosal defects were closed using the robotic gripper in combination with through-the-scope (TTS) clips, whereas closure in the CESD group was performed using standard TTS clips alone. Primary outcomes included total procedure time, dissection speed, blind dissection rate, and success rate of defect closure. Endoscopic and histological evaluations were conducted on postoperative day 14.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All lesions were resected without adverse events. Specimen sizes were comparable between groups (928.1 ± 74.5 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. 937.2 ± 54.8 mm<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.53). However, the RESD group demonstrated significantly shorter procedure times (10.2 ± 1.7 min vs. 15.8 ± 2.1 min, p < 0.05) and faster dissection speeds (157.6 ± 33.3 mm<sup>2</sup>/min vs. 91.4 ± 23.7 mm<sup>2</sup>/min, p < 0.05). Complete defect closure was achieved in all RESD cases, compared to 66.6% in the CESD group. The RESD group also exhibited fewer clip requirements and superior wound healing, as evidenced by narrower zones of epithelial absence and significantly reduced neovascular and fibroblast infiltration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The robotic dual-function gripper significantly enhanced technical performance and mucosal healing in gastric ESD within a porcine model, suggesting its potential as an effective adjunct for gastric therapeutic endoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12182-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically complex procedure associated with prolonged operative duration and a heightened risk of complications. To enhance procedural efficiency and safety, various adjunctive techniques have been introduced, particularly for tissue traction and mucosal defect closure. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a novel robotic dual-function gripper capable of performing both tissue traction and defect approximation in an in vivo model.

Methods: A dual-function robotic gripper was developed to facilitate submucosal dissection and post-ESD closure. Comparative experiments were conducted using robot-assisted ESD (RESD) and conventional ESD (CESD) on 24 gastric lesions created in six live pigs. In the RESD group, mucosal defects were closed using the robotic gripper in combination with through-the-scope (TTS) clips, whereas closure in the CESD group was performed using standard TTS clips alone. Primary outcomes included total procedure time, dissection speed, blind dissection rate, and success rate of defect closure. Endoscopic and histological evaluations were conducted on postoperative day 14.

Results: All lesions were resected without adverse events. Specimen sizes were comparable between groups (928.1 ± 74.5 mm2 vs. 937.2 ± 54.8 mm2, p = 0.53). However, the RESD group demonstrated significantly shorter procedure times (10.2 ± 1.7 min vs. 15.8 ± 2.1 min, p < 0.05) and faster dissection speeds (157.6 ± 33.3 mm2/min vs. 91.4 ± 23.7 mm2/min, p < 0.05). Complete defect closure was achieved in all RESD cases, compared to 66.6% in the CESD group. The RESD group also exhibited fewer clip requirements and superior wound healing, as evidenced by narrower zones of epithelial absence and significantly reduced neovascular and fibroblast infiltration.

Conclusion: The robotic dual-function gripper significantly enhanced technical performance and mucosal healing in gastric ESD within a porcine model, suggesting its potential as an effective adjunct for gastric therapeutic endoscopy.

用于胃内镜下粘膜剥离牵引和闭合的双功能机器人夹持器:猪体内模型研究(带视频)。
目的:内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)是一项技术复杂的手术,手术时间长,并发症风险高。为了提高手术效率和安全性,各种辅助技术已经被引入,特别是组织牵引和粘膜缺损闭合。本研究旨在评估一种新型机器人双功能抓取器的可行性和有效性,该抓取器能够在体内模型中进行组织牵引和缺陷近似。方法:开发了一种双功能机器人夹持器,用于粘膜下剥离和esd后闭合。采用机器人辅助静电放电(RESD)和常规静电放电(CESD)对6只生猪的24个胃病变进行了对比实验。在RESD组中,使用机器人夹持器联合通过范围(TTS)夹闭合粘膜缺损,而在CESD组中仅使用标准TTS夹进行闭合。主要结果包括手术总时间、解剖速度、盲解剖率和缺损闭合成功率。术后第14天进行内镜和组织学检查。结果:所有病变均切除,无不良反应。两组间标本大小具有可比性(928.1±74.5 mm2 vs 932.2±54.8 mm2, p = 0.53)。然而,RESD组的手术时间明显缩短(10.2±1.7 min vs. 15.8±2.1 min, p2 /min vs. 91.4±23.7 mm2/min)。结论:机器人双功能夹持器显著提高了猪胃ESD模型的技术性能和粘膜愈合,表明其有潜力作为胃治疗性内窥镜的有效辅助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信