Fellowship of the European Board of Surgery in the specialty of Minimally Invasive Surgery (F.E.B.S./MIS): a continuous evaluation.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Adisa Poljo, Jennifer M Klasen, Nathan J Curtis, Marek Soltes, Nader K Francis, Dorin Popa, Milos Bjelovic, Predrag Andrejevic, Beat P Müller, Felix Nickel, Georg Bischof, Lars Fischer
{"title":"Fellowship of the European Board of Surgery in the specialty of Minimally Invasive Surgery (F.E.B.S./MIS): a continuous evaluation.","authors":"Adisa Poljo, Jennifer M Klasen, Nathan J Curtis, Marek Soltes, Nader K Francis, Dorin Popa, Milos Bjelovic, Predrag Andrejevic, Beat P Müller, Felix Nickel, Georg Bischof, Lars Fischer","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12204-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) has become the standard approach for many procedures, driving rapid changes in training pathways and challenging traditional assessment and accreditation methods. To address this, the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), in collaboration with the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), established a working group in 2015 to develop a MIS-specific board fellowship exam (Fellow of European Board of Surgery in Minimally Invasive Surgery (F.E.B.S./MIS)). This rigorous, multi-modality examination assesses surgeons' knowledge and skills to ensure high-quality independent practice. This study provides an overview of the exam's development, structure, and quality assurance, with a focus on participant evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligibility followed UEMS criteria, including certified MIS training, case logbook documentation, and English proficiency. The exam comprised a 100-item multiple-choice test (MCQ) and an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) with clinical scenarios and validated technical skill tasks. Participants completed evaluation questionnaires on exam experience. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, linear regression, and independent-samples t-tests to examine associations between experience, performance, and total scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2018 and 2024, 119 participants from 28 countries undertook the exam in seven European countries. Most were experienced attending surgeons, with pass rates of 61-88%. Higher credit scores were linked to passing, though not directly correlated, indicating experience alone did not ensure success. Fellowships were considered as the optimal exam time, with motivations including certification and knowledge updates. Feedback was highly positive, especially for oral case-based stations, and nearly all recommended the exam. Suggested improvements included streamlining the application process, enhancing practical training opportunities, offering flexible dates, and enabling exams in candidates' home countries or languages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The UEMS/EAES MIS Board exam is firmly established as a specialized certification for MIS and has been well received by participants. Nevertheless, its broader influence and professional recognition still require systematic assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12204-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) has become the standard approach for many procedures, driving rapid changes in training pathways and challenging traditional assessment and accreditation methods. To address this, the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), in collaboration with the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), established a working group in 2015 to develop a MIS-specific board fellowship exam (Fellow of European Board of Surgery in Minimally Invasive Surgery (F.E.B.S./MIS)). This rigorous, multi-modality examination assesses surgeons' knowledge and skills to ensure high-quality independent practice. This study provides an overview of the exam's development, structure, and quality assurance, with a focus on participant evaluation.

Methods: Eligibility followed UEMS criteria, including certified MIS training, case logbook documentation, and English proficiency. The exam comprised a 100-item multiple-choice test (MCQ) and an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) with clinical scenarios and validated technical skill tasks. Participants completed evaluation questionnaires on exam experience. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, linear regression, and independent-samples t-tests to examine associations between experience, performance, and total scores.

Results: Between 2018 and 2024, 119 participants from 28 countries undertook the exam in seven European countries. Most were experienced attending surgeons, with pass rates of 61-88%. Higher credit scores were linked to passing, though not directly correlated, indicating experience alone did not ensure success. Fellowships were considered as the optimal exam time, with motivations including certification and knowledge updates. Feedback was highly positive, especially for oral case-based stations, and nearly all recommended the exam. Suggested improvements included streamlining the application process, enhancing practical training opportunities, offering flexible dates, and enabling exams in candidates' home countries or languages.

Conclusion: The UEMS/EAES MIS Board exam is firmly established as a specialized certification for MIS and has been well received by participants. Nevertheless, its broader influence and professional recognition still require systematic assessment.

欧洲外科委员会微创外科专业研究员(F.E.B.S./MIS):持续评估。
背景:微创外科(MIS)已经成为许多手术的标准方法,推动了培训途径的快速变化,并挑战了传统的评估和认证方法。为了解决这个问题,欧洲医学专家联盟(UEMS)与欧洲内窥镜手术协会(EAES)合作,于2015年成立了一个工作组,以制定针对miss的委员会奖学金考试(欧洲微创外科委员会研究员(F.E.B.S./MIS))。这种严格的、多模式的考试评估外科医生的知识和技能,以确保高质量的独立实践。本研究概述了考试的发展、结构和质量保证,重点是参与者的评价。方法:符合UEMS标准,包括认证的MIS培训,病例日志记录和英语水平。考试包括100项选择题测试(MCQ)和客观结构化临床测试(OSCE),包括临床场景和验证的技术技能任务。参与者完成考试体验评估问卷。使用描述性统计、线性回归和独立样本t检验对数据进行分析,以检验经验、表现和总分之间的关联。结果:2018年至2024年间,来自28个国家的119名参与者在7个欧洲国家参加了考试。大多数是经验丰富的主治外科医生,通过率为61-88%。较高的信用评分与通过考试有关,尽管没有直接关联,这表明仅凭经验并不能确保成功。奖学金被认为是最佳的考试时间,动机包括认证和知识更新。反馈是非常积极的,特别是口头案例电台,几乎所有人都推荐考试。建议的改进措施包括简化申请流程,增加实践培训机会,提供灵活的日期,以及在考生的祖国或语言中进行考试。结论:UEMS/EAES管理信息系统委员会考试作为管理信息系统的专业认证已经牢固确立,并得到了参与者的好评。然而,其更广泛的影响和专业认可仍需要系统的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信