Model-Robust Standardization in Cluster-Randomized Trials.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Fan Li, Jiaqi Tong, Xi Fang, Chao Cheng, Brennan C Kahan, Bingkai Wang
{"title":"Model-Robust Standardization in Cluster-Randomized Trials.","authors":"Fan Li, Jiaqi Tong, Xi Fang, Chao Cheng, Brennan C Kahan, Bingkai Wang","doi":"10.1002/sim.70270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In cluster-randomized trials, generalized linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations have conventionally been the default analytic methods for estimating the average treatment effect as routine practice. However, recent studies have demonstrated that their treatment effect coefficient estimators may correspond to ambiguous estimands when the models are misspecified or when there exist informative cluster sizes. In this article, we present a unified approach that standardizes output from a given regression model to ensure estimand-aligned inference for the treatment effect parameters in cluster-randomized trials. We introduce estimators for both the cluster-average and the individual-average treatment effects (marginal estimands) that are always consistent regardless of whether the specified working regression models align with the unknown data generating process. We further explore the use of a deletion-based jackknife variance estimator for inference. The development of our approach also motivates a natural test for informative cluster size. Extensive simulation experiments are designed to demonstrate the advantage of the proposed estimators under a variety of scenarios. The proposed model-robust standardization methods are implemented in the MRStdCRT R package.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 20-22","pages":"e70270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In cluster-randomized trials, generalized linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations have conventionally been the default analytic methods for estimating the average treatment effect as routine practice. However, recent studies have demonstrated that their treatment effect coefficient estimators may correspond to ambiguous estimands when the models are misspecified or when there exist informative cluster sizes. In this article, we present a unified approach that standardizes output from a given regression model to ensure estimand-aligned inference for the treatment effect parameters in cluster-randomized trials. We introduce estimators for both the cluster-average and the individual-average treatment effects (marginal estimands) that are always consistent regardless of whether the specified working regression models align with the unknown data generating process. We further explore the use of a deletion-based jackknife variance estimator for inference. The development of our approach also motivates a natural test for informative cluster size. Extensive simulation experiments are designed to demonstrate the advantage of the proposed estimators under a variety of scenarios. The proposed model-robust standardization methods are implemented in the MRStdCRT R package.

聚类随机试验的模型稳健标准化。
在聚类随机试验中,作为常规实践,一般采用广义线性混合模型和广义估计方程作为估计平均治疗效果的默认分析方法。然而,最近的研究表明,当模型被错误指定或存在信息簇大小时,它们的处理效应系数估计可能对应于模糊的估计。在本文中,我们提出了一种统一的方法,该方法标准化了给定回归模型的输出,以确保聚类随机试验中治疗效果参数的估计一致推断。我们引入了集群平均和个体平均处理效果(边际估计)的估计量,无论指定的工作回归模型是否与未知数据生成过程一致,这些估计量始终是一致的。我们进一步探讨了使用基于删除的折刀方差估计器进行推理。我们方法的发展也激发了对信息簇大小的自然测试。设计了大量的仿真实验来证明所提出的估计器在各种场景下的优势。提出的模型鲁棒性标准化方法在MRStdCRT R包中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信