Navigating the Boundaries of Teleconsultation-Capabilities, Limitations, and Pathways for Improvement: Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Patients With Stroke.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Arkers Kwan Ching Wong, Xiaomin Lu, Joyce Xiaoli Wang, Rose Sin Yi Lin, Jing Jing Su, Robbie Mian Wang, Vivian Wai Yan Kwok
{"title":"Navigating the Boundaries of Teleconsultation-Capabilities, Limitations, and Pathways for Improvement: Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Patients With Stroke.","authors":"Arkers Kwan Ching Wong, Xiaomin Lu, Joyce Xiaoli Wang, Rose Sin Yi Lin, Jing Jing Su, Robbie Mian Wang, Vivian Wai Yan Kwok","doi":"10.2196/75841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survivors of stroke often face persistent challenges accessing postdischarge care due to mobility limitations, transportation burdens, and inflexible scheduling. Teleconsultation has emerged as a potential solution to improve continuity of care, but its perceived strengths and limitations from the patient perspective remain insufficiently understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the experiences of survivors of stroke with a nurse-led teleconsultation program to (1) identify perceived capabilities; (2) understand limitations in usability, accessibility, and clinical function; and (3) generate patient-informed recommendations for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was embedded within a 3-month nurse-led teleconsultation intervention delivered by advanced practice nurses. A total of 21 survivors of ischemic stroke (aged 45-76 y; female: n=11, 52%) who had preserved cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment score ≥22) and smartphone access participated in 6 focus groups conducted via Zoom. Data were analyzed thematically using an established framework. Data saturation was achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants widely valued teleconsultation for reducing logistical burdens; enhancing access; and offering a more comfortable, emotionally supportive setting for follow-up care. Many reported increased awareness and motivation for self-monitoring. However, limitations included an inability to perform physical assessments or respond to emergencies; digital and usability barriers, especially among older users; and scheduling inflexibility. Participants emphasized the need for patient-initiated follow-up mechanisms, physician collaboration for medication management, and greater support for users considered digitally marginalized. They also highlighted the potential of teleconsultation to serve as a triage tool, reserving in-person care for complex cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurse-led teleconsultation was perceived as a convenient and supportive modality for poststroke care, particularly for stable follow-ups and psychosocial support. However, its long-term viability depends on addressing clinical and technical limitations, enhancing user autonomy, and integrating interdisciplinary input. By centering the lived experiences of survivors of stroke, this study offers concrete recommendations to guide the development of more inclusive, responsive, and patient-centered teleconsultation models.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e75841"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/75841","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Survivors of stroke often face persistent challenges accessing postdischarge care due to mobility limitations, transportation burdens, and inflexible scheduling. Teleconsultation has emerged as a potential solution to improve continuity of care, but its perceived strengths and limitations from the patient perspective remain insufficiently understood.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the experiences of survivors of stroke with a nurse-led teleconsultation program to (1) identify perceived capabilities; (2) understand limitations in usability, accessibility, and clinical function; and (3) generate patient-informed recommendations for improvement.

Methods: A qualitative study was embedded within a 3-month nurse-led teleconsultation intervention delivered by advanced practice nurses. A total of 21 survivors of ischemic stroke (aged 45-76 y; female: n=11, 52%) who had preserved cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment score ≥22) and smartphone access participated in 6 focus groups conducted via Zoom. Data were analyzed thematically using an established framework. Data saturation was achieved.

Results: Participants widely valued teleconsultation for reducing logistical burdens; enhancing access; and offering a more comfortable, emotionally supportive setting for follow-up care. Many reported increased awareness and motivation for self-monitoring. However, limitations included an inability to perform physical assessments or respond to emergencies; digital and usability barriers, especially among older users; and scheduling inflexibility. Participants emphasized the need for patient-initiated follow-up mechanisms, physician collaboration for medication management, and greater support for users considered digitally marginalized. They also highlighted the potential of teleconsultation to serve as a triage tool, reserving in-person care for complex cases.

Conclusions: Nurse-led teleconsultation was perceived as a convenient and supportive modality for poststroke care, particularly for stable follow-ups and psychosocial support. However, its long-term viability depends on addressing clinical and technical limitations, enhancing user autonomy, and integrating interdisciplinary input. By centering the lived experiences of survivors of stroke, this study offers concrete recommendations to guide the development of more inclusive, responsive, and patient-centered teleconsultation models.

导航远程会诊的界限-能力,限制和改善途径:中风患者经验的定性研究。
背景:由于行动能力限制、交通负担和不灵活的日程安排,中风幸存者经常面临获得出院后护理的持续挑战。远程会诊已成为改善护理连续性的潜在解决方案,但从患者的角度来看,其优势和局限性仍未得到充分理解。目的:本研究旨在探讨护士主导的卒中幸存者远程会诊项目的经验,以:(1)识别感知能力;(2)了解可用性、可及性和临床功能的局限性;(3)根据患者情况提出改进建议。方法:对由高级执业护士提供的为期3个月的由护士主导的远程会诊干预进行定性研究。通过Zoom进行6个焦点小组的研究,共选取21例认知功能(蒙特利尔认知评估评分≥22分)和智能手机接入的缺血性脑卒中幸存者(年龄45-76岁,女性:n=11,占52%)。使用已建立的框架对数据进行主题分析。数据饱和。结果:受访者普遍重视远程会诊减轻后勤负担;提高访问;并为后续护理提供更舒适、情感支持的环境。许多人报告说,他们增强了自我监督的意识和动机。但是,限制包括无法进行身体评估或对紧急情况作出反应;数字和可用性障碍,尤其是老年用户;日程安排不灵活。与会者强调有必要建立由患者发起的后续机制、医生在药物管理方面的合作,以及为被认为是数字边缘化的用户提供更多支持。他们还强调了远程会诊作为分诊工具的潜力,为复杂病例保留面对面的护理。结论:护士主导的远程会诊被认为是卒中后护理的一种方便和支持的方式,特别是对于稳定的随访和心理社会支持。然而,其长期可行性取决于解决临床和技术限制,增强用户自主权,并整合跨学科的投入。通过以中风幸存者的生活经验为中心,本研究提供了具体的建议,以指导开发更具包容性、响应性和以患者为中心的远程会诊模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信