Disparities in Physical Function and Rehabilitation Utilization: A Cross-sectional Study of Patients Hospitalized for Acute Medical Illness.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maylyn Martinez, Rachel Baccile, Joshua Johnson, Jason Falvey, Monica E Peek, Vineet Arora, David Meltzer
{"title":"Disparities in Physical Function and Rehabilitation Utilization: A Cross-sectional Study of Patients Hospitalized for Acute Medical Illness.","authors":"Maylyn Martinez, Rachel Baccile, Joshua Johnson, Jason Falvey, Monica E Peek, Vineet Arora, David Meltzer","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09826-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black patients have poorer physical function and mobility compared to White patients but utilize physical rehabilitation services less.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether racial differences exist in physical function and post-acute care facility utilization and whether neighborhood social disadvantage influences these differences.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study of hospitalized patients at a large urban academic hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We included self-identified Black or White adults who were hospitalized between January 2018 and May 2022.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The main exposure was self-identified race. The exposure in our secondary aim was neighborhood social disadvantage measured by the Area Deprivation Index. Neighborhood disadvantage was categorized as \"more\" (deciles 6-10) vs. \"less\" (deciles 1-5). Primary outcomes included inpatient functional measures, inpatient and post-acute physical therapy referral, and discharge location.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Compared to White patients, Black patients had more functional impairment on admission [OR 1.52; 95% CI (1.37, 1.69)], poorer mobility change [β-0.83; 95% CI (- 1.16, 0.50)], more mobility loss [OR 1.25; 95% CI (1.12, 1.41)], but no statistically significant difference in inpatient PT referrals after adjusting for physical function. Most differences in function persisted when stratified by neighborhood disadvantage. Despite similar odds of recommendation for discharge to a PAC facility, Black patients had significantly lower odds of discharge to a facility [OR 0.53; 95% CI (0.42, 0.68). This difference persisted when stratified by more neighborhood disadvantage [OR 0.60; 95% CI (0.43, 0.85)] and less neighborhood disadvantage [OR 0.43; 95% CI (0.31, 0.61)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study of patients hospitalized at a large urban academic medical center, Black patients had poorer functional outcomes yet nearly half the likelihood of discharging to a post-acute care facility compared to White patients. Race was a more consistent driver of disparities than neighborhood disadvantage. Hospital, healthcare system, and public policy changes are needed to improve discharge location appropriateness and recovery after hospitalization for vulnerable patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09826-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Black patients have poorer physical function and mobility compared to White patients but utilize physical rehabilitation services less.

Objective: To determine whether racial differences exist in physical function and post-acute care facility utilization and whether neighborhood social disadvantage influences these differences.

Design: A cross-sectional study of hospitalized patients at a large urban academic hospital.

Participants: We included self-identified Black or White adults who were hospitalized between January 2018 and May 2022.

Main measures: The main exposure was self-identified race. The exposure in our secondary aim was neighborhood social disadvantage measured by the Area Deprivation Index. Neighborhood disadvantage was categorized as "more" (deciles 6-10) vs. "less" (deciles 1-5). Primary outcomes included inpatient functional measures, inpatient and post-acute physical therapy referral, and discharge location.

Key results: Compared to White patients, Black patients had more functional impairment on admission [OR 1.52; 95% CI (1.37, 1.69)], poorer mobility change [β-0.83; 95% CI (- 1.16, 0.50)], more mobility loss [OR 1.25; 95% CI (1.12, 1.41)], but no statistically significant difference in inpatient PT referrals after adjusting for physical function. Most differences in function persisted when stratified by neighborhood disadvantage. Despite similar odds of recommendation for discharge to a PAC facility, Black patients had significantly lower odds of discharge to a facility [OR 0.53; 95% CI (0.42, 0.68). This difference persisted when stratified by more neighborhood disadvantage [OR 0.60; 95% CI (0.43, 0.85)] and less neighborhood disadvantage [OR 0.43; 95% CI (0.31, 0.61)].

Conclusion: In this study of patients hospitalized at a large urban academic medical center, Black patients had poorer functional outcomes yet nearly half the likelihood of discharging to a post-acute care facility compared to White patients. Race was a more consistent driver of disparities than neighborhood disadvantage. Hospital, healthcare system, and public policy changes are needed to improve discharge location appropriateness and recovery after hospitalization for vulnerable patients.

身体功能和康复利用的差异:急性内科疾病住院患者的横断面研究。
背景:与白人患者相比,黑人患者的身体功能和活动能力较差,但使用肢体康复服务较少。目的:探讨种族间在身体机能和急症后护理设施利用方面是否存在差异,以及社区社会劣势是否影响这些差异。设计:对某大型城市学术医院住院患者进行横断面研究。参与者:我们包括自认为是黑人或白人的成年人,他们在2018年1月至2022年5月期间住院。主要措施:主要暴露者为自认种族。我们的次要目标暴露是通过区域剥夺指数衡量的社区社会劣势。邻里劣势被归类为“更多”(十分位数6-10)。“少”(十分位数1-5)。主要结局包括住院功能测量、住院和急性后物理治疗转诊和出院地点。关键结果:与白人患者相比,黑人患者入院时功能障碍较多[OR 1.52;95% CI(1.37, 1.69)],流动性变化较差[β-0.83;95% CI(- 1.16, 0.50)],更多的活动能力丧失[OR 1.25;95% CI(1.12, 1.41)],但在调整身体功能后,住院患者PT转诊无统计学差异。当邻域劣势分层时,大多数功能差异仍然存在。尽管推荐到PAC机构出院的几率相似,但黑人患者出院的几率明显较低[OR 0.53;95% ci(0.42, 0.68)。当被更多的邻里劣势分层时,这种差异仍然存在[OR 0.60;95% CI(0.43, 0.85)]和较少的邻域劣势[OR 0.43;95% ci(0.31, 0.61)]。结论:在这项研究中,在一个大型城市学术医疗中心住院的患者中,与白人患者相比,黑人患者的功能预后较差,但出院到急性后护理机构的可能性接近一半。种族是造成不平等的更持久的因素,而不是社区劣势。医院、卫生保健系统和公共政策需要改变,以改善出院地点的适宜性和弱势患者住院后的康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信